| 1885 - 1232 страница
...That is not the mode in which this court is accustomed or willing to consider such questions. It has no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of...because irreconcilable with the constitution, except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1885 - 848 страница
...That is not the mode in which this court is accustomed or willing to consider such questions. It has no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of...because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
| 1903 - 460 страница
...over or inter- AND ference with the President or Congress or the HEARD Legislatures of the States. They have no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of a State or the United States, void because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as they are called upon... | |
| District of Columbia. Rent Commission - 1925 - 108 страница
...adhered since its inception. Steamship Company v. Emigration Commissioners. 113 US 33. at p. 39: "It has no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of...because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. District of Columbia - 1925 - 696 страница
...since its inception. Steamship Company v . Emigration Commissioners, 113 TJ. S. 33, at p. 39 : " It has no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of...because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as It is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the District of Columbia - 1925 - 686 страница
...since its inception. Steamship Company v. Emigration Connnlsstoners, 113 US 33, at p. 39 : " It has no Jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of...because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1926 - 324 страница
...That is not the mode in which this court is accustomed or willing to consider such questions. It has no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute. either of...because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
| United States. Customs Court - 1979 - 334 страница
...Marbury y. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 177180. This Court, as is the case with all Federal courts, "has no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of...because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1960 - 106 страница
...(Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 177-180). This Court, as is the case with all Federal courts, 'has no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of...because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1960 - 98 страница
...(Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 177-180). This Court, as is the case with all Federal courts, 'has no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of...because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
| |