Bricker v. Philadelphia & Reading

R.R. Co..

132 Pa. St. 1; 18 Atl. 983; 19 Am. St. Rep. 585

.207

Brooklyn Street R.R. Co. v. Kelley. .6 Ohio C. C. 155.

Buffalo, Pittsburgh & Western R.R.

Co. v. O'Hara....

Burton v. West Jersey Ferry Co..

Butler v. Pittsburg & Birmingham
Passenger R'y Co.

n41

Camden & Atlantic R. R. Co.
Hoosey..

Campbell v. Harris.

V.

Carrico v. West Virginia, Central &
Pacific R'y Co.

Carrico v. West Virginia, Central &
Pacific R'y Co......

.99 Pa. St. 492; 44 Am. Rep. 120..... 198 Tex. Civ. App. 636; 23 S. W. 35...n312

Carter v. Kansas City Cable R'y Co..42 Fed. Rep. 37.
Cauley v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati &

St. Louis R'y Co.

Caveny v. Neely..

39 W. Va. 86; 19 S. E 571; 24 L. R. A. 50.

435

679

Cincinnati Omnibus Co v. Kuhnell. .11 Weekly Law Bul. (Ohio) 189.
Cincinnati Street R'y Co. v. Kelsey..9 Ohio C. C. 170...

Clark V. Chicago, Burlington &

Clark v. Raleigh & Gaston R R. Co., 63 N. C 523 note..
Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati &

Indianapolis R. R. Co. v. Walrath. .38 Ohio St. 461; 43 Am. Rep. 433.... 23 Cleveland, Painesville & Ashtabula

n41

n41

.15 Fed. Rep. 588.

.684

n6

Dampman v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.. 166 Pa. St. 520; 31 Atl. 244.
Davis v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St.

Paul R'y Co.

Dawkins v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa
Fe R'y Co...

93 Wis. 470; 67 N.W. 16; 67 N. W. 1132; 33 L. R. A. 654.

197

507

.77 Tex. 232; 13 S. W. 984.

289

Duff v. Allegheny Valley R.R. Co...91 Pa. St. 458; 36 Am. Rep. 675.
Dun v. Seaboard & Roanoke R.R. Co.78 Va. 645; 49 Am. Rep. 388..
Dunlap v. Steamboat Reliance..
.2 Fed. Rep. 249..
Durnett v. Gulf City R'y & Real Es-
tate Co..

37 S. W. Rep. (Tex. Civ. App.) 336.n295

.67 Fed. Rep. 209; 14 C. C. A. 368..n651

.165 Pa. St. 624; 31 Atl. 52...

205

.19 Phila. 430; 44 Leg. Int. 145.
8 Tex. Civ. App. 71.

n126

325

.84 Wis. 105; 54 N. W. 24; 36 Am. St. Rep. 917.....

485

472

n215

354

Fisher v. West Virginia & Pittsburg

R.R. Co......

Fleming v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati,

.42 W.Va. 183; 24 S.E. 570; 33 L.R.A. 69..

-459

Chicago & St. Louis R'y Co.......158 Pa. St. 130; 27 Atl. 858; 38 Am.

Germantown Passenger R'y Co. v.
Walling..

Gillis v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.
Gleeson v. Virginia Midland R. R.

4 Tex. Civ. App. 31; 23 S.W. 277..
72 Wis. 307; 39 N.W. 866

105 Pa. St. 38..

97 Pa. St. 55; 39 Am. Rep. 796...
59 Pa. St. 129; 98 Am. Dec. 317
Co.140 U. S. 435; 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 859;
35 Lawy. ed. 458....

Goldey v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.... 30 Pa. St. 242; 72 Am. Dec. 703.
Grand Trunk Railway Co. of Canada

.254

312 .526.

109

112 61

.644

196

v. Stevens.. 95 U S. 655; 24 Lawy. ed. 535.....638 Grant v. Raleigh & Gaston R. R. Co. 108 N. C. 462; 13 S. E. 209..

Hale v. Grand Trunk R.R..

H

60 Vt. 605; 15 Atl. 300.

Hamilton v. Texas & Pacific R'y Co.64 Tex. 251; 53 Am. Rep. 756
Hammond v. North Eastern R. R. Co.6 S. C. 130; 24 Am. Rep. 467
Hastings v. Northern Pacific R'y Co.53 Fed. Rep. 224.

Hawkins v. Front Street Cable R'y

Co......

328

256 .235 n669

3 Wash. 592; 28 Pac. 1021; 28 Am. St. Rep. 72.

Heighway v. Voorhees

Herstine v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co... 151 Pa. St. 244; 25 Atl. 104
Heucke v. Milwaukee City R'y Co...69 Wis. 401; 34 N.W. 243
Heumphreus v. Fremont, E. & M. V.

R.R. Co..

Houston & Texas Central R'y Co. v.
Clemmons..

8 S. Dak. 103; 65 N. W. 466 ..

55 Tex. 88; 40 Am. Rep. 799. . . . .

397

214

n526

..n245

n274

Houston & Texas Central R'y Co. v.
Hampton.

Houston & Texas Central R'y Co. v.
Moore.....

Huckel v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie

R.R..

Hughes v. Pullman's Palace Car Co
Hughes v. Wilmington & Weldon R.

R. Co

International & Great Northern R'y

Co. (Receivers of) v. Armstrong.. 4 Tex. Civ. App. 146; 23 S.W. 236. .n313 International & Great Northern R'y

McCall v. Forsyth..

McCloskey v. Bells Gap R.R.
Malcom v. Richmond & Danville
R. R. Co..

Malone v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie
R.R...

106 N. C. 63; 11 S. E. 187.....

152 Pa. St. 390; 25 Atl. 638.
Mann v. Philadelphia Traction Co... 175 Pa. St. 122; 34 Atl. 572.
Martin v. McMillan...
.63 N. C. 486.
Matthews v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co. . 148 Pa. St. 191; 26 Atl. 67.......
Maury v. Talmadge...
2 McLean (U. S. Circ.) 157;
Cas. 9,315.

Meier v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co....
Meuer v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St.
Paul R'y Co...

Mexican Central R'y Co. v. Lauricella....

Missimer v. Philadelphia & Reading
R.R. Co... . . . .

.64 Pa. St. 225; 3 Am. Rep. 581

5 S. Dak. 568; 59 N.W. 945;

L. R. A. 81..

I

n79

120

n7

n104

Fed.

655

197

25 245

.87 Tex. 277; 28 S. W. 277; 47 Am. St. Rep. 103... ..273

17 Phila. 172; 42 Leg. Int. 405.....n174