| United States. Supreme Court - 1934 - 816 страница
...provision of the Constitution meant to the vision of that day it must mean to the vision of our tune. If by the statement that what the Constitution meant at the time HOME BLDG. & L. ASSN. v. BLAISDELL. 443 398 Opinion of the Court. of its adoption it means to-day,... | |
| 1952 - 1286 страница
...provision of the Constitution meant to the vision of that day it must mean to the vision of our time. If by the statement that what the Constitution meant...upon them, the statement carries its own refutation. It was to guard against such a narrow conception that Chief Justice Marshall uttered the memorable... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1953 - 1304 страница
...provision of the Constitution meant to the vision of that day it must mean to the vision of our time. If by the statement that what the Constitution meant...it is Intended to say that the great clauses of the Consitution must lie confiined to the interpretation which the framers, with the conditions and outlook... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1953 - 1218 страница
...provision of the Constitution meant to the vision of that day if must mean to the vision of our time. If by the statement that what the Constitution meant...it is intended to say that the great clauses of the Consitution must be conflined to the interpretation which the framers, with the conditions and outlook... | |
| United States. Commission on Population Growth and the American Future - 1972 - 642 страница
...provision of the Constitution meant to the vision of that day it must mean to the vision of our time. If by the statement that what the Constitution meant...upon them, the statement carries its own refutation. [Emphasis added.] There is, said the Chief Justice, "a growing recognition of public needs and the... | |
| Jerome Frank - 1973 - 464 страница
...considering their origin and the line of their growth." Subsequently, Chief Justice Hughes declared, "If by the statement that what the Constitution meant...upon them, the statement carries its own refutation." (These remarks are probably not applicable to the highly specific, unambiguous, provisions of the Constitution.)... | |
| |