Comon'lth ex rel., Zieg-
343 ler et al. v. Guy et al
415 Connor, Common'lth ex
rel., Mattern v
390 Connolly, Estate of
69 Contested Election of Up-
perman, In re

Burt et al. v. Greek Cath-
olic Church et al.
Butz's License
Byerly v. Consolidated
Real Estate Co.
Byers v. Byers et al.
Byles v. Jacob and Dia-
mond National Bank
Byrd et al., Skinner et al v 281

BOOK NOTICES,

Bender's National Law-
yers' Diary for 1904
Brightly's Digest of Laws
of Penna., 1903
Monaghan's Digest of Pa.
Decisions for 1903
The Law of Builders in
Penna.

Life of John Marshall
Street Railway Reports

Canton Twp. v. W. & C.
Ry. Co.

Canton Twp. School Dis-
trict, Taylor v.
Carey, Estate of
Caughey & Bergman v.
Parker

Caverly, Estate of

Certificate of Nomination

47 Consolidated Real Estate
Co., Byerly v.
County of Washington,

Hunter v.
Cunningham, Estate of
230 Cushing v. McKenna

154 Daley v. Henry

Daly, Estate of
300 Daum, Anshutz et ux. v
Davison, Estate of
Densmore, Comon'lth v.
306 Denniston Ave., Swiss-
282
282 vale, In re

Devlin, Estate of
Dillenkofer, Estate of
142 Dormidy v. Sharon Boiler
Works

5 Doyle v. B. &O. R. R. Co.
58 Dorwart v. Pgh. Ry. Co.
Dredgeboat Northern, J.
149 Rees & Sons v.
220 Dryden v. P. V. & C. Ry.
Co.

In re Objtections to 246 Dunley, Estate of
Chambers, Comon'lth v. 182
Circleville Boro, Incor-

DIED.

166 Craig, Wesley I., Esq.
139, 296 Hasbrouck, Cicero, Esq.
Lambie, John S., Esq.
129 McCollum, Honorable J.
341 Brewster

poration of
Claney, Estate of
Clyde Coal Co. v. P. &
L. E. R. R. Co.
Coleman v. Brown et al.
Comes v. Beezer Bros.

Comon'lth v. Chambers

94 Wallace, Clarence E., Esq. 351
182

Comon'lth v. Densmore 345 East Pittsburgh Improve-
Comon'lth ex rel. v. Fox 309
Comon'lth ex rel., Grier

v. Morris

Comm'lth, ex rel Jones v.
School Board of Mifflin
Township
Comon'lth v. Klein
Comon'lth ex rel., Mat-

tern v. Connor
Comon'lth ex rel. v. Mc-
Ilvaine et al
Comon'lth v. Schulte
Comonl❜th ex rel., Shore

v. Bradley
Comon'lth ex rel Young
v. Harvey et al

265

238

178

Ry. Co. et al., Charter
App., Executive Dept.

7

128

189

ment Co., Quenten v.
Eggers, Jenkinson Co. v. 185
106 Eggers et ux. v. Millvale 208
Eger v. Union Savings
Fund & Loan Associa-
374 tion of McKeesport
83 Estate of Johanna Mont-
gomery v. Pittsburg

96

Estate, Ammon
317 Estate, Belcher
181 Estate, Borland

Estate, Carey
276 Estate, Caverly
Estate, Claney
380 Estate, Connolly

350

397

First Nat. Bank of Pitts-
burgh v. Peebles
First Nat. Bank New Ken-
sington v. Pa. Trust Co. 215
Fleming v. Richmon & Son 256
Fox et al., Common'lth

ex rel v.

364 Fry & Fry v. Mercantile

309

174, 286

Trust Co., trustees

227

93
Fuehr et al v. Fuehr et al 294
257
58 Fulton, Estate of

220

139, 296 Gensenleiter & Co., Gold-
301 smith Bros. v.

JUL 18 1930

42

German Nat. B. & L. A.
of Pitts'gh., Pownall v.
Geyser v. Reymer Bros.
Gibson, Schmidt v.
Glesenkamp, Estate of
Goldsmith Bros. v. Gen-
senleiter & Co.
Gray et al v. Twp. of N.
Versailles et al
Greek Catholic Church
et al, Burt et al. v.
Gudfelder v. P., C., C. &
St. L. Ry. Co.
Guthrie et al. v. Johnson
et al.

Guy et al., Common'lth
ex rel, Zeigler et al. v.

Hamill v. Andresak
Hanna v. Pittsburg
Hansen et al., Pressed

Steel Car Co. v.
Hartupee et al., Wing &

Evans v.
Harvey, Comon'lth ex
rel Young v.
Evans v.
Haugh v. Knoxville Land

Improvement Co.
Heckman v. Board Con-
trollers of Allegheny,
Murphy et al.
Henderson, Estate of
Henry, Daley v.
Herman Brick Co. et al,
Wilson v.

Heyl et al, Waterson v.
Holman, Estate of

Horn et al., Jones v.
House, Estate of

31 Kaufman et al. v. Liggett 119
Kay et al., Prudential
59 Trust Co. et al. v.

Keenan v. McMurray
380 Kelley v. Bradley
59 Kiser, Estate of

King v. King
199 Klein, Com. of Penna. v.
Kleinman et al. v. Phila-
delphia Company et al.
81 Koehler et ux v. Pa. Co.
98 Konrad v. Nugent et al.
313 Kountz v. Allegheny
Camp Meeting Ass'n.
327 Knoxville Land Improve-
407 ment Co., Haugh v.
111
262 Lebowitz et al v. United
210 Traction Company

House of Representatives 248 Lewis v. Lewis
Huckestein et al., Shan-
nopin Brick & Sand Co. v

Hultz, Estate of

Hunter v. Baxter
Hunter V. County of

Washington

50

Lewis, United States ex
rel v.
173 License, Beese's
191 Liggett, Kaufmann v.
Lindsay, Estate of
412 Lininger v. Westinghouse
Air Brake Company
389 Littell, Estate of
Logan, McCombs v.

Huron St. Pittsburg, In re 131
Huseman v. Bailey et al

Improved Street Sweeper

Inc. of Circleville Boro

District, Thalman v. 261
Mullen, Phoenix Iron
Works Company v. 126
Mullen v. Phoenix Iron
288
Works Company
223 Murphy et al. v. North-
16 western Terra Cotta Co. 226
147 Murphy, Estate of

177

127

335

83 McCausland, Ritchey v. 259
McClane et al. v. W. &

113

200

116

15 McIntosh, Estate of
McKalip, Mackey v.
McKelvey Grove Imp❜nt.
Co., P. & C. R. R. Co. v 160
McKenna, Cushing v.

199

373

184 McMurray, Keenan v.
127 McTighe, Estate of

223

38

Co. v. Pittsburgh et al. 278 Mackey v. McKallip
166 Mahoney, Meadville v.
Mahoney v. Park Steel
Company
149, 150
216 Malaney v. Pennock et al 390
Manufacturers Light and

In re Contested Election

of Upperman

In re Denniston Avenue,
Swissvale

Kleinman et al. v

113

Schlegel, Estate of

Phoenix Iron Works Co.

v. Mullen

126

Mullen v

Phoenix Iron Works Co.,

Piatt v. Seif et al

Pittsburg, Farnen v

127

11

176

Pittsburg, Beltz v

197

pany, Lebowitz et al. v 184
United Traction Co., Pitts-
burg Iron Paint Co. v. 247
United States ex rel v.
Lewis, warden

43 United States, Moorehead
Brother & Co. v

347

354

241

382

Pittsburg, Estate of Jo-
hanna Montgomery v.

Pittsburg, Hanna v.

398

271

278

150

Schmidt v. Gibson
School Board of Mifflin
Township, Common-
wealth ex rel Jones v. 374
School District of Mun-
hall v. School District
of Twp. of Mifflin
Schulte, Common'lth v
397 Schupert v. Pittsburgh
Railways Co.
Scovel, Moorehead et al v 329
Seif et al, Piatt v
Shannopin Brick & Sand
Comp'y v. Huckestein
Sharon Boiler Works,
Dormidy v
Silverman, Trelisky v
Skinner et al v. Byrd et al
Smathers v. Baum
Snee v. West Side Belt
R. R. Co.
Stevenson v. Spiller
399 Strauthers, Estate of
Swearingen v. Barnsdall
104
183 Taylor v. Canton Town-
ship School District
Teel Mining Company et
al, Neal et al. v
Thalman v. Mt. Albion
Sub-school District

Pittsburg, Werneburg,
Sheehan & Co. v
Pittsburgh et al Improved
Street Sweeper Co. v
P. & C. Street Railway
Co., Van Voorhis v.
Pittsburg Clay Pot Co. v.
Pittsburg Insurance Co. 231
Pittsburg Iron Paint Co.
v. United Traction Co. 247
Pittsburg, Martin et al v.
Pittsburg Railways Co.,
Schupert v.
Pittsburg Railways Co. et
al., Travelli v
Pittsburgh Railways Co.,

398

Wabash Avenue, In re
Walker v. Walker
Wallis, American Trust

Comp'y of Pittsburg v. 377
Washington & Cannons-
burg Ry. Co. et al, Mc-
Clane et al v

65

181

107

400

359

271

73

387

Pownall v. German Nat.
B. & L. Asso. of Pitts-

5 Willis, Estate of
Willison, Estate of

243

17, 305

233

Wing & Evans v. Hartu-

burg

190

tupee et al

59

Pressed Steel Car Co. v.

261

Winters v. Pugh et al

Hansen et al

Guarantee B. & L. As-
sociation v.

Willock v. Beaver Valley
R. R. Co.

201

175

Tibby, Estate of

Tomer et al v. McFarland

Pugh et al, Winters v

Quenten v. East Pitts-

burgh Improvement
Company

et al
Travelli v. Pittsburg Rail-
ways Company et al 104
189 Trelisky v. Silverman et al 164]

Yeager et al v. Schilpp
Soap Co., Ltd.

Zillmeret ux, Taufenbach
v. Fauset et al

21, 24

409

24

Dorwart v.
Pittsburg v. Wright

353

INDEX OF SUBJECTS.

ARCHITECTS-Continued.

In such a case architect's rights are not altered be-
cause secretary of board notified him of his em-
ployment, as secretary's notice was without
authority...

226 ASSIGNMENT FOR CREDITORS. See Equity.
ATTACHMENT. See Practice, Execution.
ATTORNEYS FEES. Attorney for certain credit-
ors of decedent who benefits all creditors by ex-
ceptions filed, is entitled to compensation out of
fund so raised.....

.... 287
AUTOMOBILES. Act of April 23, 1903, relating to
use and licensing of automobiles is constitutional 345
Count in indictment under act of 1903, charging
person with operating automobile without being
registered, cannot be sustained.......

181 BANKRUPTCY. What evidence of the security
for a loan, where the security is left in the hands
of borrower, will be sufficient to justify the court
in awarding the security to the person making
the loan, as against the trustee in bankruptcy of
the borrower..................