Power of city to repeal grant of
franchise to street railway com-
pany, 27.

Interstate Commerce.

State cannot tax business of for-
eign corporation which consists
exclusively of interstate com-
merce, 19.

Interstate Commerce Act.

Actual competition which is of
controlling force in respect to
traffic important in amount, 415.
Analysis of the fourth section,
408.

Competition between market and
market, and between product
and product, 419.

Competition justifies greater
charge for shorter haul. Simi-

lar circumstances and condi
tions, 397.

Peculiar cases of railroad compe-
tition, 414.

Relation between second and fourth

sections of the act, 404.
Water competition, 412.
Limitation of Actions.

Limitation of action for death, 68.
Local Improvement.

Exemption from taxation for local
improvements, 293.

Master and Servant.

Fellow-servants; test of co-service.
The Ross Case, 364.

ADMINISTRATORS.
See DEATH.

AGENT.

Authority of agent of street rail-
road company to employ medi-
cal aid for person injured in ac-
cident. Hanscom v. Minneapolis
St. R. Co. (Minn.), 226.
AMALGAMATION.

See CONSOLIDATION,
ASSESSMENT.

See TAXATION.
BAGGAGE.

Merchandise shipped in trunk as
baggage by travelling salesmen;
no recovery allowed for loss of
stock of jewelry contained in
such trunk. Humphreys v. Perry
(U. S.), 29.

BOARD OF EQUALIZATION.
See TAXATION.
BONDS.

Failure of trust owing to inability
to carry out undertaking relat-
ing to foreign railroad, Admin-
istration of unspent part of pro-
ceeds by court; distribution
among bondholders. Colling-
ham v. Sloper (Eng.), 623.
BRIDGES.

Regulation of tolls of bridge com-
pany. See CONSTITUTIONAL
LAW.

Taxation of railroad bridge. See
TAXATION.

CARRIERS.

See BAGGAGE, INTERSTATE COM-
MERCE ACT.
Discrimination in rates; contract
for, by railroad is illegal. Brun-
dred v. Rice (Ohio), 446.

Money paid by shipper dis-
criminated against and received
by favored shipper under his
agreement with the company
may be recovered back. Brun-
dred v. Rice (Ohio), 446.

not illegal at common law;
carrier only obliged to make
charges reasonable. Complaint
for discrimination must allege
that charges complained of were
unreasonable. Cowden v. Pac.
Coast S. Co. (Cal.), 438.

Carriers' charge must be rea-
sonable, and all persons must
be treated alike. Louisville, E.
& St. L. Con. R. Co. v. Wilson
(Ind.), 452.

based on quantity of freight
shipped is illegal. Louisville,
Evans. & St. L. Con. R. Co. v.
Wilson (Ind.), 452.

Whether company may dis-
criminate in favor of shipper
supplying ties at given price is
a question for the jury. Louis-
ville, Evans. & St. L. Con. R.
Co. v. Wilson (Ind.), 452.

Carrier cannot establish rates