United States Supreme Court Reports, Том 40Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1901 Complete with headnotes, summaries of decisions, statements of cases, points and authorities of counsel, annotations, tables, and parallel references. |
Из књиге
Резултати 1-5 од 100
Страница 50
... Railway Company , Burlington , C. R. & • Chicago , M. & St. P. v . United N. , Simmons v . States ( 159 U. S. 372 ) Cincinnati , N. O. & T. P. , v . Inter- state Commerce Commission ( 162 U. S. 184 ) 150 185 935 Gettysburg Electric ...
... Railway Company , Burlington , C. R. & • Chicago , M. & St. P. v . United N. , Simmons v . States ( 159 U. S. 372 ) Cincinnati , N. O. & T. P. , v . Inter- state Commerce Commission ( 162 U. S. 184 ) 150 185 935 Gettysburg Electric ...
Страница 78
... railway company was that of the statute of limitations , or prescription as it is called in the legislation of Louisiana . The case came on for trial on February 28 , 1891 , and resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiffs ...
... railway company was that of the statute of limitations , or prescription as it is called in the legislation of Louisiana . The case came on for trial on February 28 , 1891 , and resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiffs ...
Страница 133
... Railway , a corporation of the province of Ontario , for $ 1,000 each , and of certain coupons thereof , amounting to the sum of $ 71,250 , agreed to sell , and the defend- Competency of court - authority of attorney - ant agreed to ...
... Railway , a corporation of the province of Ontario , for $ 1,000 each , and of certain coupons thereof , amounting to the sum of $ 71,250 , agreed to sell , and the defend- Competency of court - authority of attorney - ant agreed to ...
Страница 142
... RAILWAY CO . , Plff . in Err . , v . 8. P. LEEP . [ No. 722. ] In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas . Messrs . John F. Dillon and Winslow S. Pierce for plaintiff in error . No counsel for defend- December 10 , 1894 ...
... RAILWAY CO . , Plff . in Err . , v . 8. P. LEEP . [ No. 722. ] In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas . Messrs . John F. Dillon and Winslow S. Pierce for plaintiff in error . No counsel for defend- December 10 , 1894 ...
Страница 145
... RAILWAY CO . et al . Plffs . in Err . , v . A. MCELROY . [ No. 110. ] In Error to the Court of Appeals of the state of Texas . Mr. John F. Dillon for plaintiffs in error . No counsel for defendant in error . March 18 , 1895. Dismissed ...
... RAILWAY CO . et al . Plffs . in Err . , v . A. MCELROY . [ No. 110. ] In Error to the Court of Appeals of the state of Texas . Mr. John F. Dillon for plaintiffs in error . No counsel for defendant in error . March 18 , 1895. Dismissed ...
Друга издања - Прикажи све
Чести термини и фразе
acres Act of Congress action affirmed alleged appellee Appt authority bill cause Cedar Rapids certificate chap charge circuit court citizens claim complainant Constitution construction contract corporation court of appeals court of equity decision decree deed defendant in error district court duty entitled equity evidence fact favor filed foreign judgment fraud grant habeas corpus held indictment Iowa issued Jacob Haish judge jurisdiction jury Justice Land Office ment Messrs Moen Company offense owner Pacific paid pany parties patent payment person petition plaintiff in error possession proceedings purpose railroad company railway company record rendered road rule S. C. Reporter's Sioux City Stat statute suit supreme court taxes telegraph company telegraph line territory testimony thereof tion township treaty trial U. S. Rev Union Pacific Railroad Union Pacific Railway United verdict Washburn & Moen Western Union wire writ of error
Популарни одломци
Страница 358 - An act [to amend an act entitled an act] to aid in the construction of a railroad and telegraph line from the Missouri River to the Pacific Ocean, and to secure to the government the use of the same for postal, military, and other purposes, approved July first, eighteen hundred and sixty-two," approved July second, eighteen hundred and sixty-four.
Страница 207 - In said agreements agreed to be paid by the party of the first part to the party of the second part...
Страница 218 - In the said territories, property of every kind, now belonging to Mexicans not established there, shall be inviolably respected. The present owners, the heirs of these, and all Mexicans who may hereafter acquire said property by contract, shall enjoy with respect to it guaranties equally ample as if the same belonged to citizens of the United States.
Страница 278 - When a given state of facts is such that reasonable men may fairly differ upon the question as to whether there was negligence or not, the determination of the matter is for the jury. It is only where the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion from them that the question of negligence is ever considered as one of law for the court.
Страница 441 - The maxim that the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendant's, is applicable to all actions for the recovery of property. But if the plaintiff had actual prior possession of the . land, this is strong enough to enable him to- recover it from a mere trespasser, who entered without any title.
Страница 443 - Whoever, having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered...
Страница 307 - ... said boat, vessel, scow, raft, or other craft may be proceeded against summarily by way of libel in any district court of the United States having jurisdiction thereof.
Страница 218 - It may not be unworthy of remark that it is very unusual, even in cases of conquest, for the conqueror to do more than to displace the sovereign and assume dominion over the country. The modern usage of nations, which has become law, would be violated ; that sense of justice and of right which is acknowledged and felt by the whole civilized world would be outraged, if private property should be generally confiscated and private rights annulled.
Страница 403 - ... no civil suit shall be brought before either of said courts against any person by any original process or proceeding in any other district than that whereof he is an inhabitant, but where the jurisdiction is founded only on the fact that the action is between citizens of different states, suit shall be brought only in the district of the residence of either the plaintiff or the defendant...
Страница 404 - And no civil suit shall be brought before either of said courts against an inhabitant of the United States by any original process in any other district than that whereof he is an inhabitant, or in which he shall be found at the time of serving the writ...