ices in contemplation of bankruptcy are specifically provided for 5. Jurisdiction; ancillary, in aid of trustee. Under clause 20 of § 2 of the Bankruptcy Act as added by the amend- 6. Jurisdiction of this court; finality of order of Circuit Court of Appeals; The seizure of property of the bankrupt by an ancillary receiver is a 7. Title of trustee; law governing effect of pledge, when trustee takes sub- The legal effect of a transaction involving pledge or hypothecation de- 8. Title and disposition of property seized by ancillary receiver; effect of Property of the bankrupt when seized by an ancillary receiver or See CORPORATIONS, 5, 6; JURISDICTION, A 2. BILLS AND NOTES. 1. Endorsement; fraud of holder in obtaining; effect on parties otherwise Where some of the signatures of defendant endorsers had been obtained by means of fraudulent representations by the plaintiff holder of 2. Renewals; effect as new promise; effect of fraudulent inducement. 3. Defenses; estoppel of plaintiff to defeat. A party cannot maintain an inconsistent position; and so held that See LOCAL LAW (N. Mex.). BONDS. See ACTIONS, 2; CONTRACTS, 6-9. BOUNDARIES. See INDIANS, 6-9. BOUNDARY FERRIES. See FERRIES, 5, 6; INTERSTATE COMMERCE, 14. BRIDGES. See INTERSTATE COMMERCE, 14. BURDEN OF PROOF. See EVIDENCE; PUBLIC LANDS, 20. CANALS. See PUBLIC WORKS. Chicago &c. Ry. Co. v. United States, 196 Fed. Rep. 882, approved in United States v. National Surety Co., 92 Fed. Rep. 549, approved in CASES DISTINGUISHED. Atlantic Coast Line v. Riverside Mills, 219 U. S. 186, distinguished in Harley v. United States, 198 U. S. 229, distinguished in United States v. Hooe v. United States, 218 U. S. 322, distinguished in United States v. United States v. McMullen, 222 U. S. 460, distinguished in United United States v. O'Brien, 220 U. S. 321, distinguished in Stone & Gravel CASES FOLLOWED. Adams Express Co. v. Croninger, 226 U. S. 491, followed in Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. J. M. Pace Mule Co., 751. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Robinson, 233 U. S. 173, followed in Atlantic Coast Line v. Mazursky, 216 U. S. 122, followed in Missouri, Atlantic Transport Co. v. Imbrovek, 234 U. S. 54, followed in Atlantic Ballinger v. Frost, 216 U. S. 240, followed in Lane v. Watts, 525. 652. Blythe v. Hinckley, 180 U. S. 333, followed in Jones v. Jones, 615. Calnan Co. v. Doherty, 224 U. S. 145, followed in Synnott v. Tombstone Chapman v. Bowen, 207 U. S. 89, followed in Synnott v. Tombstone Cons. Mines Co., 749. Chase v. United States, 155 U. S. 489, followed in United States v. Buffalo Pitts Co., 228. Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222, followed in Cincinnati Chicago &c. R. Co. v. Miller, 226 U. S. 513, followed in Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. J. M. Pace Mule Co., 751. Coder v. Arts, 213 U. S. 223, followed in Synnott v. Tombstone Cons. Collins v. Kentucky, 234 U. S. 634, followed in Malone v. Kentucky, Conboy v. First National Bank, 203 U. S. 141, followed in Synnott v. Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, followed in Prenica v. Bulger, 750; Lewiston v. Chamberlain, 751. Ex parte Harding, 219 U. S. 363, followed in Ex parte Roe, 70. Fore River Shipbuilding Co. v. Hagg, 219 U. S. 175, followed in Gal- Gibson v. Stevens, 8 How. 384, followed in Dale v. Pattison, 399. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. v. Lindsay, 233 U. S. 42, followed in Cincinnati Grenada Lumber Co. v. Mississippi, 217 U. S. 433, followed in Eastern Hazeltine v. Central Bank, 183 U. S. 130, followed in Northern Trust Co. Houston & Texas Cent. R. R. Co. v. Mayes, 201 U. S. 321, followed in In re Chetwood, 165 U. S. 443, followed in Meeker v. Lehigh Valley R. R. In re Wood and Henderson, 210 U. S. 246, followed in Lazarus v. Pren- International Harvester Co. v. Kentucky, 234 U. S. 216, followed in International Harvester Co. v. Kentucky, 234 U. S. 579, followed in Intermountain Rate Cases, 234 U. S. 476, followed in United States v. Johnson v. Hoy, 227 U. S. 245, followed in Craig v. Jarrett, 752. Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian, 215 U. S. 589, followed in Lewiston v. Kansas Southern Ry. v. Carl, 227 U. S. 637, followed in Pacific Express Kauffman v. Waters, 138 U. S. 285, followed in Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Los Angeles Switching Case, 234 U. S. 294, followed in Interstate Com. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Kentucky, 183 U. S. 503, followed in Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission, 226 U. S. 99, followed McClellan v. Garland, 217 U. S. 268, followed in Meeker v. Lehigh McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U. S. 432, followed in Lewiston v. Chamber- Miedreich v. Lauenstein, 232 U. S. 236, followed in Louisville & Nash- Missouri & K. Interurban Ry. Co. v. Olathe, 222 U. S. 185, followed in Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Cade, 233 U. S. 642, followed in Missouri, Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Goodrich, 229 U. S. 607, followed in Same Missouri &c. R. Co. v. Harriman Bros., 227 U. S. 657, followed in Sea- Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Kirchoff, 169 U. S. 103, followed in Louisville & National Bank v. Insurance Co., 100 U. S. 43, followed in Lazarus v. New York Life Ins. Co. v. Head, 234 U. S. 149, followed in Same v. Noble v. Union River Logging Co., 147 U. S. 165, followed in Lane v. North Carolina R. R. v. Zachary, 232 U. S. 248, followed in Carlson v. Patterson v. Colorado, 205 U. S. 454, followed in Clinchfield Coal Cor- Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U. S. 714, followed in Grannis v. Ordean, Pons v. Yazoo & M. V. R. R. Co., 232 U. S. 720, followed in Northern Trust Co. v. Illinois, 748. Preston v. Chicago, 226 U. S. 447, followed in Clinchfield Coal Corpo u- |