Слике страница
PDF
ePub
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

Comparing the season of 1900-01 with the two preceding, we arrive at a total production of :

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

This means an increase for 1900-01 of 478,000 tons of beet sugar, and 449,000 tons of cane sugar, or a total increase of 927,000 tons, as compared with the preceding

[blocks in formation]

This proves that the world's production has trebled during the last fifty years, greatly to the benefit of beetroot cultivation, whereas cane sugar does not even now amount to a third-part of the total consumption.

VII.

The Success of the Beet Sugar Industry.

LEGISLATORS have pushed the cultivation of beetroot, and they have pushed it successfully as we have seen. They have a right to tell economists that their intervention has been fruitful. They have largely replaced cane sugar by beet sugar. They have caused the erection of large factories, and the ignorant gazes with admiration at the figures we have given. Yet production for the sake of production is not the aim of industry; its aim is to sell at a profit; if no outlets can be found a crisis sets in; if the outlets are fictitious, the industry is artificial. What, then, becomes of those millions of tons of sugar? By whom are they consumed? Which are their outlets? and what is the future of their outlets?

VIII.

Comparison of Consumption.

WITH the assistance of the "Bulletin de Statistique," published by the ministry of finances, we have been able to show the consumption of refined sugars since 1875 in France, and the amount of revenue from the duty. We wish to remind the reader that the sugar duty has been:

73 f. 32 per 100 kilog. of refined ...

40

from 1875 to 1880 from 1880 to 1884

[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

By the side of the consumption of refined sugar, we have placed the quantity of raw sugar represented on the basis of a yield of 90 per cent., which will enable us

to compare the figures of French consumption with those of Germany, Austria, etc., established on the basis of raw

sugar.

Consumption in France and Revenue from the Sugar Duty.

[blocks in formation]

IX.

Consumption per capita and imports in England.

WHEN We look at the consumption and production of the various countries, we find that neither France, Germany, Austria, Belgium, nor Holland, consume a halfpart of what they produce. According to Licht (Liste des fabricants de sucre, p. 209), the consumption of raw sugar per head in some of the producing countries, is as follows:

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

We will now give the comparative consumption per capita of France, Germany, Austria, and the United Kingdom.

F

UNITED KINGDOM.

Consumption per capita of Raw Sugar at an Average Yield of about 90 %.

FRANCE.

GERMANY.

AUSTRIA.

Consumption

per head.

tons.

kilos. tons.

kilos. tons.

1885 378,564 37,800,000 10.01 375,743 45,600.000 8.24 188,445
1886 317,091 37,900,000 8.36 380,293 46,200,000 8.23 184,835
1887 343,533 38,000,000 9.04 361,842 46,854,000 7.72 161,950
1888 440,653 38,050,000 11.50 451,455 47,342,000 9.54 228,927
1889 401,876 38,100,000 10.50 348.120 48,419,000 7.19 246,673
1890 503,319 38,150,000 13.19 498,439 49,235,000 10.12 308,363
1891 469,909 38,200,000 12.30 523,952 49,728,000 10.54 290,816
1892 558,876 38,250,000 14.61 532,301
1893 510,423 38,300,000 13.32 557,488
1894 478,904 38,350,000 12.48 574,506
1895 449,310 38,400,000 11.70 615,098
1896 462,636 38,450,000 12.03 744,366

1897 446,594 38,500,000 11.59 561,882
1898 474,399 38,550,000 12.30 708,237
1899 497,349 38,600,000 12.88 757,098
1900 490,000 38,650,000 12.67 850,303

kilos. tons.

kilos

[blocks in formation]

40,500,000 4.65
40,800,000 4.53
41,000,000 4.95
41,100,000 5.57
41,809,000 5.90
42,100,000 7.32
42,750,000 6.80
50,292,000 10.58 311,624 42,815,000 7.28
50,753,000 10.98 337,854 43,233,000 7.81
51,287,000 11.20 325,002 43,230,000 7.52
51,817,000 11.87 395,003 43,356,000 9.11
52,569,000 395,810 44,448,000 8.91

(1) 12,34
53,254,000 370,857 44,901,000 8.26
54,168,000 13.07 366,937 45,391,000 8.09
54,938,000 13.78 379,586 45.780,000 8.29
55,835,000 15.23 366,743 46,335,000 8

(1) Duty altered August 1st, 1896, consumers having stocked large quantities.

1,275,596 37,700,000 33.83||
1,358,976 38,000,000 35.76
1,378,172 38,250,000 36.03||
1,410,097 38,500,000 36.65
1,354,558 38,500,000 35.18
1,483,874 38,700,000 38.34
1,520,254 38,900,000 39.08
1,561,792 39,282,000 39.72
1,546,771 39,614,000 39.05
1,655,561 39,972,000 41.42
1,619,860 40,400,000 40.09
|1,692,382 40,708,000 41.57

« ПретходнаНастави »