New-York, North Carolina, nor Georgia, can by any means be compared with the models from which he reasoned, and to which the terms of his description apply. If we therefore take his ideas on this point, as the criterion of truth, we shall be driven to the alternative, either of taking refuge at once in the arms of Monarchy, or of splitting ourselves into an infinity of little, jealous, clashing, tumultuous Commonwealths, the wretched nurseries of unceasing discord, and the miserable objects of universal pity or contempt. Some of the writers, who have come forward on the other side of the question, seem to have been aware of the dilemma; and have even been bold enough to hint at the division of the larger States, as a desirable thing. Such an infatuated policy, such a desperate expedient, might, by the multiplication of petty offices, answer the views of men, who possess not qualifications to extend their influence beyond the narrow circles of personal intrigue; but it could never promote the greatness or happiness of the people of America.

Referring the examination of the principle itself to another place, as has been already mentioned, it will be sufficient to remark here, that in the sense of the author who has been most emphatically quoted upon the occasion, it would only dictate a reduction of the SIZE of the more considerable MEMBERS of the Union; but would not militate against their being all comprehended in one Confederate Government. And this is the true question, in the discussion of which we are at present interested.

So far are the suggestions of MONTESQUIEU from standing in opposition to a general Union of the States, that he explicitly treats of a CONFEDERATE REPUBLIC as the expedient for extending the sphere of popular Government, and reconciling the advantages of monarchy with those of republicanism.

"It is very probable," (says he,*) "that mankind would "have been obliged, at length, to live constantly under "the Government of a SINGLE PERSON, had they not "contrived a kind of Constitution, that has all the inter"nal advantages of a Republican, together with the ex"ternal force of a Monarchical Government. I mean a "CONFEDERATE REPUBLIC.

"This form of Government is a Convention by which "several smaller States agree to become members of a "larger one, which they intend to form. It is a kind of "assemblage of societies, that constitute a new one, ca"pable of increasing by means of new associations, till "they arrive to such a degree of power, as to be able to "provide for the security of the united body.

"A Republic of this kind, able to withstand an exter"nal force, may support itself without any internal "corruptions. The form of this society prevents all "manner of inconveniences.

"If a single member should attempt to usurp the su"preme authority, he could not be supposed to have an "equal authority and credit in all the Confederate "States. Were he to have too great influence over one, "this would alarm the rest. Were he to subdue a part, "that which would still remain free might oppose him "with forces, independent of those which he had usurp"ed, and overpower him before he could be settled in his " usurpation.

"Should a popular insurrection happen in one of the "Confederate States, the others are able to quell it. "Should abuses creep into one part, they are reformed "by those that remain sound. The State may be de"stroyed on one side, and not on the other; the Confed"eracy may be dissolved, and the Confederates preserve "their Sovereignty.

"As this Government is composed of small Repub

*Spirit of Laws, Vol. I. Book IX. Chap. I. — Publius.

"lics, it enjoys the internal happiness of each; and with "respect to its external situation, it is possessed, by "means of the Association, of all the advantages of "large Monarchies."

I have thought it proper to quote at length these interesting passages, because they contain a luminous abridgment of the principal arguments in favor of the Union, and must effectually remove the false impressions, which a misapplication of other parts of the work was calculated to make. They have, at the same time, an intimate connection with the more immediate design of this Paper; which is, to illustrate the tendency of the Union to repress domestic faction and insurrection.

A distinction, more subtle than accurate, has been raised between a Confederacy and a consolidation of the States. The essential characteristic of the first is said to be, the restriction of its authority to the members in their collective capacities, without reaching to the individuals of whom they are composed. It is contended, that the National Council ought to have no concern with any object of internal administration. An exact equality of suffrage between the members has also been insisted upon as a leading feature of a Confederate Government. These positions are, in the main, arbitrary; they are supported neither by principle nor precedent. It has indeed happened, that Governments of this kind have generally operated in the manner which the distinction, taken notice of, supposes to be inherent in their nature; but there have been in most of them extensive exceptions to the practice, which serve to prove, as far as example will go, that there is no absolute tule on the subject. And it will be clearly shown, in the course of this investigation, that as far as the principle contended for has prevailed, it has been the cause of incurable disorder and imbecility in the Government.

The definition of a Confederate Republic seems sim

ply to be," an assemblage of Societies," or an Association of two or more States into one State. The extent, modifications, and objects of the Fœderal authority, are mere matters of discretion. So long as the separate organization of the members be not abolished; so long as it exists, by a constitutional necessity, for local purposes; though it should be in perfect subordination to the general authority of the Union, it would still be, in fact and in theory, an Association of States, or a Confederacy. The proposed Constitution, so far from implying an abolition of the State Governments, makes them constituent parts of the National Sovereignty, by allowing them a direct representation in the Senate, and leaves in their possession certain exclusive and very important portions of Sovereign power. This fully corresponds, in every rational import of the terms, with the idea of a Federal Government.

In the Lycian Confederacy, which consisted of twenty-three CITIES, or Republics, the largest were entitled to three votes in the COMMON COUNCIL, those of the middle class to two, and the smallest to one. The COMMON COUNCIL had the appointment of all the Judges and Magistrates of the respective CITIES. This was certainly the most delicate species of interference in their internal administration; for if there be anything that seems exclusively appropriated to the local jurisdictions, it is the appointment of their own officers. Yet MoNTESQUIEU, speaking of this Association, says, "Were I "to give a model of an excellent Confederate Republic, "it would be that of Lycia." Thus we perceive, that the distinctions insisted upon were not within the contemplation of this enlightened civilian; and we shall be led to conclude, that they are the novel refinements of an erroneous theory.

PUBLIUS.

[From the New York Packet, Friday, November 23, 1787.]

THE FEDERALIST.

No. X.

TO THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK:

AMONG the numerous advantages promised by a

well-constructed Union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction. The friend of popular Governments never finds himself so much alarmed for their character and fate, as when he contemplates their propensity to this dangerous vice. He will not fail, therefore, to set a due value on any plan which, without violating the principles to which he is attached, provides a proper cure for it. The instability, injustice, and confusion introduced into the public councils, have, in truth, been the mortal diseases under which popular Govern ments have everywhere perished; as they continue to be the favorite and fruitful topics from which the adversaries to liberty derive their most specious declamations. The valuable improvements made by the American Constitutions on the popular models, both ancient and modern, cannot certainly be too much admired; but it would be an unwarrantable partiality, to contend that they have as effectually obviated the danger on this side, as was wished and expected. Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith, and of public and personal liberty, that our Governments. are too unstable; that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties; and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice, and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force