Слике страница
PDF
ePub

legislative days, and it was decided in the affirmative, a majority of all the Senators elected voting in favor thereof, and three-fifths being present, as follows:

[blocks in formation]

Ordered, That the Clerk return said bill to the Assembly, with a message that the Senate has concurred in the passage of the same, as amended.

The Assembly sent for concurrence, a resolution, in the words following:

Resolved (if the Senate concur), That a respectful message be sent to the Governor, requesting the return to the Assembly of Assembly bill (No. 942, Rec. No. 194) entitled “An act to amend the Stock Corporations Law, in relation to election of directors, for the purpose of amendment. .

The President put the question whether the Senate would agree to said resolution, and it was decided in the affirmative.

Ordered, That the Clerk return said resolution to the Assembly, with a message that the Senate has concurred in the passage of the same.

Mr. Whitney, from the committee on public health, to which was referred the Assembly bill introduced by Mr. Seeley (No. 276, Rec. No. 158), entitled "An act to amend the Public Health Law, in relation to qualifications of local health officers,” reported in favor of the passage of the same, which report was agreed to, and said bill restored to its place on the order of third reading.

Mr. Newton, from the committee on codes, to which was referred the Senate bill introduced by Mr. Slater (No. 1387, Int. No. 1093), entitled "An act to amend the Code of Civil Procedure, in relation to service by publication of a summons or a citation,” reported in favor of the passage of the same, which report was agreed to, and said bill restored to its place on the order of third reading

Mr. Whitney, from the committee on public health, to which was referred the Senate bill introduced by Mr. Whitney (No. 1250, Int. No. 1005), entitled "An act to amend the Public Health Law, in relation to junior pharmacists and examinations for licenses,” reported in favor of the passage of the same with amendments, which report was agreed to.

On motion of Mr. Whitney, and by unanimous consent, the. rules were suspended and said bill ordered to a third reading.

Mr. Whitney, from the committee on public health, to which was referred the Senate bill introduced by Mr. Slater (No. 1092, Int. No. 901), entitled "An act to amend the Public Health Law, in relation to the registration of boys over sixteen years of age and for the protection and preservation of their health,” reported in favor of the passage of the same with amendments, which report was agreed to.

On motion of Mr. Slater, and by unanimous consent, the rules were suspended and said bill ordered to a third reading.

Mr. Walters, from the committee on the judiciary, to which was referred the Senate bill introduced by Mr. Walters (No. 1051, Int. No. 874), entitled "An act to amend the Religious Corporations Law, in relation to corporations with governing authority over, or advisory relations with, churches or synods, or both," reported in favor of the passage of the same, which report was agreed to.

On motion of Mr. Walters, and by unanimous consent, the rules were suspended and said bill ordered to a third reading.

Mr. Whitney, from the committee on public health, to which was referred the Senate bill introduced by Mr. Sage (No. 1291, Int. No. 1019) entitled "An act to amend the Public Health Law, in relation to the payment of hospital charges," reported in favor of the passage of the same, which report was agreed to.

On motion of Mr. Sage, and by unanimous consent, the rules were suspended and said bill ordered to a third reading.

Mr. Whitney, from the committee on public health, to which was referred the Senate bill introduced by Mr. Emerson (No. 1122, Int. No. 931) entitled "An act to amend the Public Health Law, in relation to the health districts around Lake George,reported in favor of the passage of the same, which report was agreed to.

On motion of Mr. Emerson, and by unanimous consent, the rules were suspended and said bill ordered to a third reading.

Mr. Walters, from the committee on the judiciary to which was referred the Assembly bill introduced by Mr. McWhinney (No. 1290, Rec. No. 225) entitled "An act to amend the Membership Corporations Law, in relation to limitations on the acquisition of land for cemetery purposes in certain counties," reported in favor of the passage of the same, which report was agreed to, and said bill committed to the committee of the whole.

The Assembly bill (No. 1460, Rec. No. 249) entitled "An act to authorize the board of education of Union Free School District Number Eleven of Sangerfield and Marshall, Oneida county, to raise annually by tax for the years nineteen hundred and eighteen to nineteen hundred and twenty-three, both inclusive, certain sums to constitute a sinking fund for the redemption of bonds of such district hereafter maturing," was read the third time.

The President put the question whether the Senate would agree to the final passage of said bill, the same having been printed and upon the desks of the members in its final form for three calendar legislative days, and it was decided in the affirmative, a majority of all the Senators elected voting in favor thereof, and three-fifths being present, as follows:

[blocks in formation]

Ordered, That the Clerk return said bill to the Assembly, with a message that the Senate has concurred in the passage of the

same.

The Senate bill (No. 1352, Int. No. 546) entitled "An act to amend the Election Law, in relation to facilitating the taking of the soldier vote," was read the third time.

The President put the question whether the Senate would agree to the final passage of said bill, the same having been printed and upon the desks of the members in its final form for three calendar legislative days, and it was decided in the affirmative, a majority of all the Senators elected voting in favor thereof, and three-fifths being present, as follows:

[blocks in formation]

Ordered, That the Clerk deliver said bill to the Assembly and request their concurrence therein.

The Senate bill (No. 1218, Int. No. 787) entitled "An act to amend the Real Property Law, in relation to certain agree ments for the occupation of real estate," was read the third time.

The President put the question whether the Senate would agree to the final passage of said bill, the same having been printed and upon

the desks of the members in its final form for three calendar legislative days, and it was decided in the affirmative, a majority of all the Senators elected voting in favor thereof, and three-fifths being present, as follows:

[blocks in formation]

Ordered, That the Clerk deliver said bill to the Assembly and request their concurrence therein.

The Senate bill (No. 566, Int. No. 517) entitled "An act to amend the Highway Law, in relation to the rebuilding of bridges which were former toll bridges," was read the third time.

The President put the question whether the Senate would agree

[blocks in formation]

to the final passage of said bill, the same having been printed and upon the desks of the members in its final form for three calendar legislative days, and it was decided in the affirmative, a majority of all the Senators elected voting in favor thereof, and three-fifths being present, as follows:

[blocks in formation]

Ordered, That the Clerk deliver said bill to the Assembly and request their concurrence therein.

The Senate bill (No. 1309, Int. No. 1037) entitled "An act to amend the Town Law, in relation to town maps of certain towns in the county of Erie,” was read the third time.

The President put the question whether the Senate would agree to the final passage of said bill, the same having been printed and upon the desks of the members in its final form for three calendar legislative days, and it was decided in the affirmative, a majority of all the Senators elected voting in favor thereof, and three-fifths being present, as follows:

[blocks in formation]

Ordered, That the Clerk deliver said bill to the Assembly and request their concurrence therein.

The Senate bill (No. 1338, Int. No. 1056) entitled “An act to revive and extend the corporate existence of The Buffalo Co-Operative Brewing Company, of Buffalo, New York,” was read the third time.

« ПретходнаНастави »