The Oklahoma Law Journal, Том 12Dennis, 1913 |
Из књиге
Резултати 1-5 од 100
Страница 15
... question therefore is reduced to this : Was his power of decision exhausted when on May 10 , 1909 , he approved the proposed adjust- ment ? To this there can be only a negative answer . That decision was not final , but interlocutory ...
... question therefore is reduced to this : Was his power of decision exhausted when on May 10 , 1909 , he approved the proposed adjust- ment ? To this there can be only a negative answer . That decision was not final , but interlocutory ...
Страница 18
... question , this court would not , in the absence of manifest error , inter- fere with the discretion of the trial judge in permitting or refusing an amendment . ( Prominent in connection with settlement of the ques- tions involved in ...
... question , this court would not , in the absence of manifest error , inter- fere with the discretion of the trial judge in permitting or refusing an amendment . ( Prominent in connection with settlement of the ques- tions involved in ...
Страница 29
... question arises in a suit on`a written obligation , as to whether the signers executed the same in a representative capacity or as individuals , and anything appears on the face of the instrument which suggests a doubt as to the party ...
... question arises in a suit on`a written obligation , as to whether the signers executed the same in a representative capacity or as individuals , and anything appears on the face of the instrument which suggests a doubt as to the party ...
Страница 30
2 . The question of allowing amendments to plead- ings , is addressed to the sound judicial discretion of the trial ... questions are raised in the record , but two of which are seriously urged in the brief , the others appearing to have ...
2 . The question of allowing amendments to plead- ings , is addressed to the sound judicial discretion of the trial ... questions are raised in the record , but two of which are seriously urged in the brief , the others appearing to have ...
Страница 48
... question of fact for the jury , upon that question the employer is con- cluded by the jury's verdict , as in other cases involving . a question of fact . ( Syllabus by the Court . ) C. O. Blake and others , for plaintiff in error ...
... question of fact for the jury , upon that question the employer is con- cluded by the jury's verdict , as in other cases involving . a question of fact . ( Syllabus by the Court . ) C. O. Blake and others , for plaintiff in error ...
Садржај
293 | |
329 | |
333 | |
337 | |
354 | |
381 | |
389 | |
401 | |
123 | |
125 | |
169 | |
170 | |
171 | |
209 | |
230 | |
240 | |
245 | |
416 | |
429 | |
461 | |
470 | |
472 | |
481 | |
501 | |
517 | |
Друга издања - Прикажи све
Чести термини и фразе
action Adair County adjourn Affirmed alleged allotment appointed authority Carter County cause charged Cimarron County commission Constitution contract contributory negligence conviction corporation County Attorney County Court Court of Appeals Court of Oklahoma decision Defendant in Error Delaware county District Court duty engine Error from County Error from District evidence execution fact Federal fendant filed Geiser homestead Indian injury instruction interest issue judgment judicial July jurisdiction jury justice land lawyer lease Lee Cruce legislative legislature liability Lieutenant Governor ment motion negligence offense oil and gas Okla Oklahoma County opinion owner pardon party person petition Plaintiff in Error pleadings Pottawatomie County practice proceedings prosecution question railroad reason record Rendered reversible error Roger Mills County rule salary Secretary Section Senate session statute Supreme Court Syllabus testimony thereof tion trial court trial Judge verdict witness Woods County writ