Слике страница
PDF
ePub

40

Page

Page Republic of Colombia v. Cauca Co. 704 Shurtleff v. United States (189 U. S. 311) 535 Reynolds, Pacific Coast Co. v. (187 U. S. Siegel v. Swarts (187 U. S. 638).

846 610)

841 Slater v. Mexican Nat. R. Co. (187 U. S. Rhoads, Kelley v. (188 U. S. 1). 259 647)

856 Rhode Island Locomotive Works v. Conti- Smith v. Brown (187 U. S. 637).

845 nental Trust Co. (187 U. S. 649). 847 Smythe v. United States (188 U. S. 156).. 279 R. H. White Co., Mifflin v... 769 Snyder v. Bettman.

803 Richardson Drug Co., Hennessy v. (189 Snyder, Allegheny Oil Co. v. (187 U. S. U. S. 25). 532 639)

841 Rickert, United States v. (188 U. S. 432).. 478 Soderberg, Northern Pac. R. Co. v. (183 Rio Grande W. R. Co., Telluride Power

U. S. 526)

365 Transmission Co. v. (187 U. S. 569).... 178 South Carolina, Brownfield v. (189 U. Roanoke, The (189 U. Š. 185). 491 S. 426)

513 Robinson v. Belt (187 U. S. 41).

16 Southern Pac. R. Co. v. Jack (187 U. S. Robinson v. Chicago City R. Co. 854 653)

844 Robinson, Burget v. (188 U. S. 739). 848 Southern Pac. R. Co. v. United States Rogan, Weber v. (188 U. S. 10). 263 (189 U, S. 447).

567 Rogers, De Cambra v. (189 U. S. 119). 519 Southern Pac. R. Co. v. Wood (187 U. S. Romig v. Gillett (187 U. S. 111).

652)

844 Rommel v. County Court of Barbour Coun- Southern R. Co. v. Allison.

713 ty (187 U. S. 654)...

846 Southern R. Co. v. Craig (187 U. S. 641).. 842 Rood, State of Iowa v. (187 U. S. 87)... 49 Southern R. Co., Calvert v. (187 U. S. 636) 844 Ropes v. Clyde S. S. Co. (187 U. S. 645). 845 Southern R. Co., Moore v. (189 U. S. 513) 852 Rothschild v. Memphis & C. R. Co. (188 Southern R. Co., Railroad Equipment Co. U. S. 740).. 848 V. (187 U. S. 653).

844 Rowley, Jaquith v. (188 U. S. 620). 369 Spratt, Thayer v. (189 U. S. 346).

576 Roy, Pickens v. (187 U. S. 177).

78 Springer, Hegeman v. (189 U. S. 505). 849 Royston v. Weis (187 U. S. 646).

845 S. P. Shotter Co., United States v. (188 Rubber Tire Wheel Co. v. Goodyear Tire U. S. 742).

848 & Rubber Co. (187 U. S. 641)..

842 Standard Sewing Mach. Co. v. Leslie (188 Rural Independent School Dist. of Allison U. S. 740).

848 v. Fairfield (187 U. S. 643).

843 Stanly County v. W. N. Coler & Co.. 811

Stanly County v. W. N. Coler & Co. (186 Sachs, In re (190 U. S. 1).. 718 U. S. 484). .

856 St. Joseph & Elkhart Power Co., Indiana Starin, The John H., Gurney v..

854 Power Co. v. (187 U. S. 636). 842 Starr, Prout v. (188 U. S. 537).

398 Sampson, United States v. (187 U. S. 436) 216 State of Alabama, Jacobi v. (187 U. S. 133) 48 Sampson, United States v. (188 U. S. 283) 412 State of Alabama, Kidd v. (188 U. S. 730) 401 San Diego Land & Town Co. v. Jasper State of Alabama, Kidd v. (188 U. S. 733) 402 (189 U. S. 439).

571 State of California, Sexton v. (189 U. S. San Jose Land & Water Co. v. San Jose 319)

543 Ranch Co. (189 U. S. 177).

487 State of Colorado, Reid v. (187 U. S. 137) 92 San Jose Ranch Co., San Jose Land & State of Florida, Tarrance v. (188 U. S. Water Co. v. (189 U. S. 177). 487 519)

402 Santiago Apostol, The, United States v. State of Illinois v. Binns (189 U. S. 506).. 851 (189 U. S. 453).

593 State of Illinois, Billings v. (188 U. S. 97) 272 Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., La Republique State of Illinois, Board of Directors of Francaise v. (186 U, S. 486).

855 Chicago Theological Seminary V. (188 Sawyer v. Piper (189 U, S. 154).

633
U. S. 662).

386 Say On v. United States (187 U. S. 655).. 856 State of Illinois, Dreyer v. (187 U. S. 71) 28 Schaefer v. Werling (188 U. S. 516). 449 State of Iowa v. Rood (187 U. S. 87). 49 Schulte v. Heman (189 U, S. 507).

852 State of Iowa, Easton v. (188 U. S. 220) 288 Schwartz v. Duss (187 U. S. 8).

4 State of Maryland, Northern Cent. R. Co. Scottish Union & Nat. Ins. Co. v. Herriott V. (187 U. S. 258).

62 (187 U. S. 651)..

841 State of Michigan, Reetz v. (188 U. S. 505) 390 Scruggs, Randolph & Randolph v... 710 State of Michigan, United States v.. 742 Seaman v. Berliner Gramaphone Co. (187 State of Missouri, Layton v. (187 U. S. U. S. 646).. 846 356)

137 Sears v. Board of Street Com’rs of City of State of Missouri, Western Union Tel. Co. Boston (189 U. S. 515). 851

730 Second Nat. Bank v. Fitzpatrick (189 U. S. State of New Hampshire, Collins v. (187 508) 853 U. S. 636)

844 Security Trust Co. v. Black River Nat. State of New York v. Cummings (187 U. Bank (187 U. S. 211)... 52 S. 650)

840 Security Trust Co. v. Dent (187 U. S. 237) 61 State of New York, Hyatt v. (188 U. S. Seiler, Fuller & Johnson Mfg. Co, v.. 854 691)

456 Sena v. Unitea States (189 U. S. 233). 596 State of North Carolina, Caldwell v. (187 Sena v. United States (189 U. S. 504). 857 U. S. 622)...

229 Severita, The, United States v. (189 U. S. State of South Carolina, Brownfield v. 453) 593 (189 U. S. 426).

513 Sexton v. People of State of California (189 State of Tennessee v. Condon (189 U. S. U. S. 319) 543 64)

579 Shaw, Chicago & E. R. Co. v. (187 U. S. State of Tennessee v. State of Virginia 640) 841 (190 U. S. 64)..

827 Shedd. Hardin v..

685 State of Tennessee, Cook v. (187 U. S. 639) 847 Shine, Grin v. (187 U. S. 181).

98 State of Vermont, Doherty v. (189 U. S. Shine, O'Brien v. (189 U. S. 516). 852 514)

850 Shotter Co., United States v. (188 U. S. State of Virginia, State of Tennessee v. 742) 848 (190 U. S. 64)..

827

V.

90

Page

Pago State of Washington, Johanson v..: 825 United States v. The Fernandito (189 U. State of West Virginia, Swann v. (188 U. S. 453)

593 S. 739) 848 United States v. Hitchcock.

698 Stewart v. Washington & A. S. S. Co. United States v. Hitchcock (189 U, S. 507) 852 (187 U. S. 466).

161 United States v. The Lola (189 U. S. 453) 593 Stillwell & Bierce, Eufaula Cotton Oil Co. United States v. Lynah (188 U. S. 445). 349 v. (189 U. S. 509).

850 United States v. Mission Rock Co. (189 Stone. Lawder v. (187 U. S. 281). 79 U. S. 391).

606 Stovell v. Dewey (188 U. S. 254).

415 United States v. Moseley (187 U. S. 322).. Sun Life Ius. Čo. of America v. McCabe United States v. Mullins (189 U. S. 513).. 851 (187 U. S. 630).

840 United States v. Nix (189 U. S. 199). 495 Supreme Council, American Legion of United States v. Officers, etc., of The ManHonor, v. Orcutt. 854 grove (188 U. S. 720).

343 Swann v. State of West Virginia (188 U. United States v. The Oriente (189 U. S. S. 739) 848 453)

593 Swan & Finch Co. v. United States. 702 United States v. The Paquete Habana Swarts, Siegel v. (187 U. S. 638). 846! (189 U. S. 453).

593 Sweet, United States v. (189 U. S. 471)... 638 United States v. The Poder de Dios (189

U. S. 453)....

593 Tacoma, Annie Wright Seminary v. (187 United States v. Rickert (188 U. S. 432).. 478 U. S. 639)

847 United States v. Sampson (187 U. S. 436) 216 Tarrance v. State of Florida (188 U. S. United States v. Sampson (188 U. S. 283) 412 519)

402 United States v. The Santiago Apostol (189 Taylor, United States v. (188 U. S. 283).. 412 U. S. 453).

593 Telluride Power Transmission Co. v. Rio United States v. The Severita (189 U. S. Grande W. R. Co. (187 U. S. 569). 178 453)

593 Tennessee v. Condon (189 U. S. 64). 579 United States v. S. P. Shotter Co. (188 Tennessee v. Virginia (190 U. S. 64) 827 U. S. 742)..

848 Tennessee, Cook v. (187 U. S. 639) 847 United States v. State of Michigan. 742 Territory of Hawaii v. Mankichi.

787 United States v. Sweet (189 U. S. 471)... 638 Territory of Oklahoma, Queenan v.. 762 United States v. Taylor (188 U. S. 283).. 412 Texas & P. R. Co. v. Behymer (189 U. S. United States v. Ware (189 U. S. 507). 852 468

622 United States v. Williams (188 U. S. 485) 363 Texas & P. R. Co. v. Carlin (189 U. S. United States, Ambrosini v. (187 U. S. 1).. 1 354

585 United States, Anglo-American Provision Texas & P. R. Co. v. Watson.

681
Co. v.

854 Texas & P. R. Co. v. White (187 U. S. United States, Benziger v. (186 U. S. 486) 855 654)

845 United States, Bigby v. (188 U. S. 400).. 468 Tbacher, Onondaga Nation v. (189 U. S. United States, Bird v. (187 U. S. 118).

42 306) 636 United States, Blackfeather v....

772 Thayer v. Spratt (189 U. S. 346).

576 United States, Burgdorf v. (187 U. S. 654) 846 Thomas v. "Interstate Building & Loan United States, Capdevielle v. (189 U. S. Ass'n (187 U. S 652).

842
510)

850 Times-Republican Printing Co., Given v. United States, Ching v. (189 U. S. 509). 849 (189 U, S. 513)...

851 United States, Crowley v. (187 U, S. 651) 842 Toeppner, Elliott v. (187 U. S. 327) 133 United States, De Baca v. (189 U. S. 505) 849 Town of Northampton, Clarke v. (189 U. United States, Dimmick v. (189 U. S. 509) 850 S. 513)

852 United States, Downs v. (187 U. S. 496).. 222 Townsend, Northern Pac. R. Co. v. 671 United States, Downs v. (186 U. S. 485).. 856 Travers, Whalley y. (188 U. S. 741). 819 United States, Du Shen Tau v. (187 U. S. Trowbridge, Lewis v. 854 652)

843 Tsukamoto v. Lackmann (187 U. S. 635). . 842 United States, The Expresso v. (189 U. S. Tubman v. Baltimore &0. R. Co. (190 515)

852 U. S. 38).

777 United States, Fidelity & Deposit Co, of Turpin v. Lemon (187 U. S. 51)..... 20 Maryland v. (187 U. S. 315).

120

United States, Foerster v. (187 U. S. 644) 844 Uinta Tunnel. Mining & Transportation United States, Francis v. (188 U. S. 375). 334

Co., Creed & Cripple Creek Mining & United States, The Gibara Habana v. (189 _Milling Co. v. (189 U. S. 511)...

857 U. S. 515). Union Cent. Life Ins. Co., Burt v. (187 U. United States, Helwig v. (188 U. S. 605).. 427 S. 362)

139 United States, Horman v. (187 U. S. 641) 841 Union Steamboat Co. V. Erie & W. United States, Hume v. (189 U. S. 510). 850 Transp. Co. (189 U. S. 363).

504 United States, Ketchum v. (187 U. S. 653) 844 Union & Planters' Bank v. City of Mem- United States, King Dung v. (187 U. S. phis, two cases (189 U. S. 71).. 604 6.35)

856 United States v. The Antonio Suarez (189 United States, Lee Ah Yin v. (187 U. S. U. S. 453)... 593 655)

856 United States v. The Antonio y Paco (189 United States, Lee Chin Ching v. (187 U. U. S. 453).. 593 S. 652)

843 United States v. Barnett (189 U. S. 474).. 639 United States, Lee Ling v. (187 U. S. 655) 856 United States v. Barringer (188 U. S. 577) 405 United States, Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. United States v. The Cuatro de Settembre (189 U. S. 274)...

507 (189 ('. S. 453)..

593 United States, Moy Yee Tai v. (187 U. S. United States v. Dewey (188 U. S. 254)... 415 652)

843 United States v. Dorr.

859 United States, O'Neal v. (190 U, S. 36).. 776 United States v. The Engracia (189 U. 8. United States, Oregon & C. R. Co. v. (189 453) 593 U. S. 103).

615 United States v. The Espana (189 U. 8. United States, Oregon & O. R. Co. v. (189 453) 593 U. S. 116).

620

851 Page

Page United States, Oregon & O. R. Co. V..... 673 Western Union Tel. Co. v. State of MisUnited States, Pacific Coast S. S. Co. V., souri

730 three cases (187 U. S. 454).

157 West Virginia, Swann v. (188 U. S. 739).. 848 United States, Pacific Steam Whaling Co. W. G. Eads Brokerage Co. v. City of Ft. v. (187 U. S. 447). 154 Scott, Kan. (187 U. S. 647).

846 United States, Pam-To-Pee v. (187 U. S. Whalley y. Travers (188 U. $. 741).

849 371)

142 White v. Peerless Rubber Mfg. Co. (187 United States, Payne v., two cases (189 U. U. S. 649).

848 S. 512) 857 White v. Wright (189 U. S. 507).

852 United States, Reid, Murdoch & Co. v.... 855 White, Texas & P. R. Co. v. (187 U. S. United States, Say On v. (187 U. S. 655).. 856 654)

845 United States, Sena v. (189 U. S. 233). 596 White Co., Mifflin v..

769 United States, Sena v. (189 U. S. 504). 857 Wilkes County v. W. N. Coler & Co. (190 United States, Shurtleff v. (189 U. S. 311) 535 U. S. 107)...

738 United States, Smythe v. (188 U. S. 156).. 279 Wilkes County v. W. N. Coler & Co. (189 United States, Southern Pac. R. Co. v. U. S. 511)

857 (189 U. S. 417)..

567 Wilkinson v. Owens (187 U. S. 646). 845 United States, Swan

& Finch Co. v... 702 Williams v. Parker (188 U. S. 491). 440 United States, Yee Toy v. (187 U. S. 655) 856 Williams, Crabb v. (187 U. S. 645).

845 United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Williams, United States v. (188 U. S. 485) 363 Muir (187 U. S. 648)..

847 Williamson, Eastern Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. (189 U. S. 122)..

527 Omaha Bldg. & Const. Co. (187 U. S. Wilmington, The, v. Officers, etc., of The 642) 843 Mangrove (188 U. S. 720).

343 United States Glue Co., Diamond Glue Co. Wilson, Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. (187 0. V. (187 U. S. 611). 206 S. 467)

189 United States Life Ins, Co., Cable v. (186 Wilson, Kilham v. (187 U. S. 648). 847 U. S. 482)..

855 Wiltsie, Bank of Commerce v. (189 U. S. 505)

851 Vau Buren v. McKinley (189 U. S. 516).. 852 Winebrenner v. Forney (189 U. S. 148). 590 Vanderbilt v. Coler (187 Ù. S. 654). 845 Winslow v. Baltimore & O. R. Co. (188 Vandriss, Board of Com’rs of Kearney U. S. 646)..

443 County, Kan., v. (187 U. S. 642).. 843 Winston v. Winston (189 U. S. 506)..

852 Vermont, Doherty v. (189 U, S. 514). 850 Wiser v. Lawler (189 U. S. 260).

624 Village of Clyde, Ohio, Cleveland, C., C. Witherow v. Carnegie Steel Co. (189 U. S. & Št. L. R. Co. v. (189 U. S. 516). 853 516)

853 Village of Ontonagon, Diamond Match Co. Witherspoon v. Olcott (189 U. S. 509). 850 v. (188 U. S. 82).

266 W. N. Coler & Co., Board of Com'rs of Virginia, Tennessee v. (190 U. S. 64)...

827
Stanly County v. ...:

811 Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Home W. N. Coler & Co., Board of Com'rs of Ins. Co. of New York (189 U. S. 517)... 854 Stanly County v. (186 U. S. 484). ... 856

W. N. Coler & Co., Board of Com’rs of Wabash R. Co., Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Wilkes County v. (190 U. S. 107)... 738 (187 U, S. 650)..

848 W. N. Coler & Co., Board of Com'rs of Wade, Patterson v. (188 U. S. 741)... 819 Wilkes County v. (189 U. S. 511).., Waggoner v. Flack (188 U, S. 595). 345 Wolfe, Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. (187 U. Wall v. Old Colony Trust Co. (187 U. S. S. 638)

847 637)

844 Wood, Southern Pac. R. Co. v. (187 U. Ware, United States v. (189 U. S. 507). ... 852 S. 652)

844 Washington, Johanson v..

825 Worden & Co. v. California Fig Syrup Washington Nat. Building & Loan Ass'n Co. (187 U. S. 516).

161 v. Fiske (188 U. S. 740). 848 Wright v. Henkel (190 U. S. 40).

781 Washington & A. s. s.' Co., Stewart v. Wright v. Louisville & N. R. Co. (189 U. (187 V. S. 466)... 161 S. 512)

857 Watkins, American Nat. Bank v.. 854 Wright, White v. (189 U. S. 507).

852 Watson, Texas & P, R. Co. V..... 681 Wright Seminary v. City of Tacoma (187 Watts, In re (190 U. S. 1).. 718 U. S. 639)

847 Weber v. Rogan (188 U. S. 10) 263 Wyman v. Herard (188 U, S. 743).

848 Weis, Lawrence & Co. v. (187 U. S. 646) 845 Weis, Royston v. (187 U. S. 646)..

845 Yamataya v. Fisher (189 U. S. 86)... 611
Werling, Schaefer v. (188 U. S. 516). ... 449 Yee Toy v. United States (187 U. $. 655).. 856
Western Assur. Co. of Toronto, Can., v. Young Women's Christian Home v. French
De Farconnet

854
(187 U. S. 401).....

184 Western Sand Blast Co., Rawson v. (187 U. S. 649)...

856 Zane v. Hamilton County, D. (189 U. 8. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Borough of New 370)

638 Hope (187 U. S. 419).

204

::::... 857

[ocr errors]

ARGUED AND DETERMINED

IN TI

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.

OCTOBER TERM, 1902.

tions

(187 U. 8. 1) PETER AMBROSINI, Piff. in Err. the state of Ilinois without affidng to the

bond a 50-cent revenue stamp, alleged to be UNITED STATES.

required by said act of Congress. The seco

ond count charged that defendant on August War revenue exemptions liquor-tan 30, 1898, executed a certain bond to the city bonds.

of Chicago in the penal sum of $500 with

out affixing thereto a 50-cent revenue stamp, Bonds required to given to the state of il- alleged to be required by the act. The bonds

linols and city of Chicago as a condition were set forth in extenso. A motion to precedent to the issue of a liquor license quash the indictment was made and overwere exempted from the stamp tax require ruled, and, a jury being waived, the cause ment of the war revenue act of 1898 (30 was submitted to the court for trial, defendStat. at L. 448, chap. 448), either as bonds Issued by a state or city within the meaning ant found guilty, and sentenced to pay a of the exemption conferred by $ 17 of that fine. The opinion is reported, 105 Fed. 239. act, or by virtue of the proviso la tbat sec Sections 6, 7, and 17 of the act are us tion that it was thereby intended to exempt follows: the state and municipalities in respect of “Sec. 6. That on and after tho first day the exercise of strictly governmental func of July, eighteen hundred and ninety-eight,

there shall be levied, collected, and paid, for (No. 14.]

and in respect of the several bonds, deben

tures, or certificates of stock and of indebtedArgued and Submitted December 4, 1901. ness, and other documents, instruments, Decided October 20, 1902.

matters, and things mentioned and described ERROR to the District Court of the in schedule A of this act, or for or in re of Illinois to review a judgment imposing upon which such instruments, matters, or a fine on a finding of guilty of an offense things, or any of them, shall be written or under the war revenue act. Reversed and printed by any person or persons, or party remanded, with a direction to quash the who shall make, sign, or issue the same, or indictment.

for whose use or benefit the same shall be See same case below, on motion to quash made, signed, or issued, the several taxes or indictment, 105 Fed. 239.

sums of money set down in figures against Statement by Mr. Chief Justice Fuller: or set forth in the said schedule.

the same, respectively, or otherwise specified This was a writ of error brought to re- "Sec. 7. That if any person or persons verse a judgment of the district court im. shall make, sign, or issue, or cause to be posing a fine on a finding of guilty of an of- made, signed, or issued, any instrument, fense under $ 7 of the act of Congress document, or paper of any kind or descrip entitled “An Act to Provide Ways and tion whatsoever, without the same being Means to Meet War Expenditures, and for duly stamped for denoting the tax hereby Other Purposes” (30 Stat, at L. 448, chap. imposed thereon, or without having there 148),1 otherwise known as the war revenue act of 1898. The indictment contained two upon an adhesive stamp to denote said tax,

such counts. The first charged that defendant

person or persons shall be deemed on August 30, 1898, executed a certain bond guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon convio in the penal sum of $3,000 to the people of tion thereof shall pay a fine of not more

than one hundred dollars, at the discretion · U. 8. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2284

of the court, and such instrument, doco 23 S. C.-1.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

.

ment, or paper, as aforesaid, shall not be be shall first give bond in the penal sum of competent evidence in any court.”

$3,000, payable to the people of the state of "Sec. 17. That all bonds, debentures, or Illinois, with at least two good and sufficient certificates of indebtedness issued by the of sureties, freeholders of the county in which ficers of the United States government, or the license is to be granted, to be approved by the officers of any state, county, town, by the officer who may be authorized to ismunicipal corporation, or other corporation sue the license, conditioned that he will pay exercising the taxing power, shall be, and to all persons all damages that they may hereby are, exempt from the stamp taxes sustain, either in person o. property, or required by this act: Provided, That it is means of support, by reason of the person 80 the intent hereby to exempt from the stamp obtaining a license selling or giving away taxes imposed by this act such state, county, intoxicating liquors. The officer taking town, or other municipal corporations in such bond may examine any person offered the exercise only of functions strictly be as security upon any such bond, under oath, longing to them in their ordinary govern- and require him to subscribe and swear to mental, taxing, or municipal capacity: Pro. bis statement in regard to his pecuniary vided further, That stock and bonds issued ability to become such security. Any bond by co-operative building and loan associa taken pursuant to this section may be sued tions whose capital stock does not exceed upon for the use of any person, or his legal ten thousand dollars, and building and loan representatives, who may be injured by reaassociations or companies that make loans son of the selling or giving away any intox. only to their shareholders, shall be exempt icating liquor by the person so licensed, or from the tax herein provided.”

by his agent or servant.” 2 Starr & C. Schedule a contained this provision: Anno. Stat. (III.) 2d ed. 1586, chap. 43. "Bond: For indemnifying any person or By article 5, chapter 24, of the statutes persons, firm, or corporation who shall have of Illinois concerning cities, it was pro become bound or engaged as surety for the vided : payment of any sum of money, or for the "Sec. l. The city council in cities, and due execution or performance of the duties president and the board of trustees in vilof any office or position, and to account for lages, shall have the following powers: money received by virtue thereof, and all other bonds of any description, except such “Fourth. To fix the amount, terms, and as may be required in legal proceedings, not manner of issuing and revoking licenses. otherwise provided for in this schedule, 50 cents."

"Forty-sixth. To license, regulate, and The bonds, to which it was alleged the prohibit the selling or giving away of any stamps should have been affixed, were bonds intoxicating, malt, vinous, mixed, or ferrequired by the laws of Illinois to be given mented liquor, the license not to extend be

a condition of the issue of licenses to yond the municipal year in which it shall keep dramshops or sell intoxicating liquors be granted, and to determine the amount to in the state of Illinois and in the city of be paid for such license:

Provided, Chicago.

further, That in granting licenses, such corSections 1, 2, and 5 of an act of the general porate authorities shall comply with whatassembly of the state of Illinois, entitled ever general law of the state may be in force "An Act to Provide for the Licensing of and relative to the granting of licenses. against the Evils Arising from the Sale of

“Ninety-sixth. To pass all ordi. Intoxicating Liquors," read:

nances, rules, and make all regulations “Sec. 1. That a dramshop is a place proper or necessary to carry into effect the where spirituous or vinous or malt liquors powers granted to cities or villages, with are retailed by less quantity than 1 gallon, such fines or penalties as the city council and intoxicating liquors shall be deemed to or board of trustees shall deem proper: include all such liquors within the meaning ." 1 Starr & C. 2d ed. 689, chap. 24. of this act.

The Revised Code of Chicago of 1897 pro “Sec. 2. Whoever, not having a license vided: “The mayor of the city of Chicago to keep a dramshop, shall, by himself or shall, from time to time, grant licenses for another, either as principal, clerk, or serv- the keeping of dramshops within the city of ant, directly or indirectly, sell any intoxi. Chicago to persons who shall apply to him cating liquor in any less quantity than 1 in writing therefor, and shall furnish evi. gallon, or in any quantity to be drank upon dence satisfying him of their good character. the premises, or in or upon any adjacent Each applicant shall execute to the city of room, building (,) yard, premises, or place Chicago a bond, with at least two sureties, of public resort shall be fined not less than to be approved by the city clerk or city col. twenty dollars ($20] nor more than one hun- lector, in the sum of $500, conditioned that dred dollars ($100), or imprisoned in the the applicant shall faithfully observe and county jail not less than ten nor more than keep all ordinances in force at the time of thirty days, or both, in the discretion of the the application or thereafter to be passed court.

during the period of the license applied for, "Sec. 5. No person shall be licensed to and will keep closed, on Sundays, all doors keep a dramshop, or to sell intoxicating opening out upon any street from the bar liquors, by any county board, or the author or room where such dramshop is to be kept; ities of any city, town, or village, unless and that all windows opening upon any

as

[ocr errors]
« ПретходнаНастави »