VERNON MILLER, Respondent, v. THE NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant. Miller v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 82 Hun, 614, affirmed. (Argued February 9, 1897; decided March 2, 1897.) APPEAL from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 20, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial. C. D. Prescott for appellant. D. F. Searle for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. All concur, except MARTIN and VANN, JJ., not sitting. JOANNA DITMAS et al., as Administratrices of HENY CLAY DITMAS, Deceased, Respondents, v. HECTOR M. HITCHINGS et al., as Executors, etc., of BENJAMIN G. HITCHINGS, Deceased, Appellants. Ditmas v. Hitchings, 83 Hun, 613, affirmed. (Argued February 9, 1897; decided March 2, 1897.) APPEAL from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 19, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial. James W. Eaton and Hector M. Hitchings for appellants. Frederick W. Holls for respondents. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. DAVID MURPHY et al., Respondents, v. THE STICKLEY AND SIMONDS COMPANY, Impleaded with THE SYRACUSE SAVINGS BANK, Appellant. Murphy v. Stickley Simonds Co., 82 Hun, 158, affirmed. (Argued February 12, 1897; decided March 2, 1897.) APPEAL from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 10, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee. Harrison Hoyt for appellant. W. P. Gannon for respondents. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. All concur, except HAIGHT, J., absent, and MARTIN, J., not sitting. CASPAR STAPF, Respondent, v. V. LOEWER'S GAMBRINUS BREWERY COMPANY, Appellant. Stapf v. Loewer's Gambrinus Brewing Co., 1 App. Div. 405, appeal dismissed. (Argued February 1, 1897; decided March 9, 1897.) MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 7, 1896, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. The motion was made upon the ground that the Appellate Division had unanimously decided that the verdict of the jury was supported by the evidence; that no other question is raised by the exceptions taken at the trial, and that no question of law is presented for review. Alfred & Charles Steckler for motion. Uriah W. Tompkins and C. J. G. Hall opposed. Motion granted. In re Application of WILLIAM H. LEONARD EDWARDS. (Submitted March 1, 1897; decided March 9, 1897.) APPLICATION by a law student for an order permitting him to take the examination for admission to the bar, previous to the expiration of his term of service as such law student. Application denied. In re Application of HENRY DEAN SHEDD. (Submitted March 1, 1897; decided March 9, 1897.) APPLICATION by a law student for permission to file a certificate nunc pro tunc. Application denied. THE TRUSTEES OF AMHERST COLLEGE et al., Respondents, v. THOMAS G. RITCH et al., Individually and as Trustees and Executors, etc., of DANIEL B. FAYERWEATHER, Deceased, et al., Appellants. (Argued March 1, 1897; decided March 9, 1897.) MOTION to amend the remittitur herein, so as to direct the justice before whom the action was tried to consider evidence. concerning the releases of Mrs. Fayerweather and the next of kin, which it was claimed he did not consider, and to pass upon the same. (See 151 N. Y. 282.) William Blaikie for motion. Elihu Root, C. N. Bovee, Jr., S. B. Brownell, James L. Bishop, John E. Parsons, William B. Hornblower, M'Cready Sykes and Alfred W. Kiddle opposed. Motion denied, with costs. CHRISTIAN MOSEL, Respondent, v. THE WILLIAM H. FRANK BREWING COMPANY, Appellant. Reported below, 13 App. Div. 99. (Argued March 1, 1897; decided March 9, 1897.) MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 14, 1897, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. The motion was made upon the ground that the decision of the Appellate Division was unanimous, and that no questions of law were raised by the exceptions. Bernard J. Isecke for motion. M. Hallheimer opposed. Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. HENRY F. GILLIG, Plaintiff, Respondent, v. GEORGE C. TREADWELL COMPANY, Defendant. HUGH J. GRANT, as Receiver of THE ST. NICHOLAS BANK, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SAME, Defendant. (Submitted March 1, 1897; decided March 9, 1897.) MOTION for reargument aenied, with ten dollars costs. (See 151 N. Y. 552.) ALBERT SPENCER, Respondent, v. CHAUNCY KILMER, Appellant. (Argued March 1, 1897; decided March 9, 1897.) MOTION to amend remittitur. (See 151 N. Y. 390, 403.) Motion granted by providing that costs of new trial abide the event. ADELBERT V. KOENIG, Respondent, v. UNITED LIFE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Appellant. Koenig v. United Life Ins. Assn., 12 App. Div. 454, appeal dismissed. (Argued March 1, 1897; decided March 9, 1897.) MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 5, 1897, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. The motion was made upon the ground that the Appellate Division had unanimously decided that the verdict of the jury was supported by the evidence, and that no questions of law. were raised by defendant's exceptions. Louis J. Vorhaus for motion. Edmund T. Oldham opposed. Motion granted, with costs. In the Matter of the Application of One of the Two Trustees of THE PEEKAMOSE FISHING CLUB, a Corporation, etc., for Its Dissolution; John Q. A. WARD, Petitioner, Respondent; EDWARD N. WHITON and ANTHONY W. DIMOCK, Appellants. (Submitted March 1, 1897; decided March 9, 1897.) MOTION for reargument denied, with costs. (See 151 N. Y. 511.) MARYANNA HUDA, as Administratrix, etc., of VALENTINE HUDA, Deceased, Appellant, v. THE AMERICAN GLUCOSE COMPANY, Respondent. (Argued March 1, 1897; decided March 9, 1897.) MOTION to set aside order dismissing the appeal heretofore taken herein (see 151 N. Y. 549) and place on the calendar as a preferred cause, upon the ground that the Appellate Divis |