...fellows. We agree with them in holding — and the present case requires no further decision — that the conductor of a railway train, who commands its movements,...stations it shall stop, at what speed it shall run, and{has the general management of it, and control over the persons employed upon it, represents the...

...Ohio and Kentucky courts] in holding— and the present case requires no further decision — that the conductor of a railway train, who commands its movements,...from his negligent acts the company is responsible. If such a conductor does not represent the company, then the train is operated without any representative...

...conductor. The decision of the supreme court was limited to the facts of the case, holding that "the conductor of a railway train, who commands its movements, directs when it shall start, at what station it shall stop, at what speed it shall run, and has the general management of it, and control...

...distinct department, in which their duty is that of direction and superintendence," and that " the conductor of a railway train, who commands its movements, directs when it shall stop, at what stations it shall stop, at what speed it shall run, and has the general management of...

...subordinates similarly employed. On page 394, the court, in Railway Co. v. Boss, used this language: "The conductor of a railway train who commands its movements, directs when it shall start, at what station it shall stop, at what speed it shall run, and has the general management of it, and control...

...of Kentucky],' said he,' in holding—and the present case requires no further decision — that the conductor of a railway train, who commands its movements,...from his negligent acts, the company is responsible.' The dissenting Judges (Matthews, Gray, Blatchford, and Bradley, JJ.), by Bradley J., said: ' We think...

...fellows. We agree with them in holding — and the present case requires no further decision — that the conductor of a railway train, who commands its movements,...from his negligent acts, the company is responsible. If such a conductor does not represent Opinion of the Court. the company, then the train is operated...

...Kentucky],' said he, ' in holding — and the present case requires no further decision — that the conductor of a railway train, who commands its movements,...from his negligent acts, the company is responsible.' The dissenting Judges (Matthews, Gray, Blatchford, and Bradley, J J.), by Bradley J., said : ' We think...

...fellows. We agree with them in holding — and the present case requires no further decision — that the conductor of a railway train, who commands its movements,...from his negligent acts, the company is responsible. If such a conductor does not represent Opinion of the Court. the company, then the train is operated...

...fellows. We agree with them in holding — and the present case, requires no further decision — that the conductor of a railway train, who commands its movements,...from his negligent acts the company is responsible. If such a conductor does not represent the company, then the train is operated without any representative...