 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, Peregrine Bingham - 1831 - 850 страница
...interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy. In the... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore, Joseph Payne - 1832 - 874 страница
...interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the...protection of the party can be of no benefit to either; it 1831. can only be oppressive; and, if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1837 - 524 страница
...interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interest of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy." It may... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1837 - 886 страница
...interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the...oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public, is void on the grounds of public policy." It... | |
 | Francis Stack Murphy, Edwin Tyrrell Hurlstone, Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1838 - 416 страница
...interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void on the grounds of public policy.1' In... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, John Leycester Adolphus, Thomas Flower Ellis - 1838 - 1096 страница
...favour of whom it is given, and again* Col.IV.. not so .large as to interfere with the interests or the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy." It... | |
 | 1839 - 474 страница
...should be coextensive only with the benefits meant to be enjoyed on the other."i And by Tindal, CJ : " Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, and if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable."2 This principle is equally applicable to every other species of restraint, and is the... | |
 | John William Smith - 1841 - 744 страница
...interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the...oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interest of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy. No certain... | |
 | Archibald John Stephens - 1842 - 1072 страница
...interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the...of no benefit to either ; it can only be oppressive ; it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott - 1842 - 830 страница
...interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the...protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either j it can only be oppressive ; and, if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable." Applying... | |
| |
... of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either; it can only be oppressive ; and, if oppressive, it is... 
