In Defense of the Bush DoctrineUniversity Press of Kentucky, 11. 5. 2007. - 264 страница The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, shattered the prevalent optimism in the United States that had blossomed during the tranquil and prosperous 1990s, when democracy seemed triumphant and catastrophic wars were a relic of the past. President George W. Bush responded with a bold and controversial grand strategy for waging a preemptive Global War on Terror, which has ignited passionate debate about the purposes of American power and the nation's proper role in the world. In Defense of the Bush Doctrine offers a vigorous argument for the principles of moral democratic realism that inspired the Bush administration's policy of regime change in Iraq. The Bush Doctrine rests on two main pillars—the inadequacy of deterrence and containment strategies when dealing with terrorists and rogue regimes, and the culture of tyranny in the Middle East, which spawns aggressive secular and religious despotisms. Two key premises shape Kaufman's case for the Bush Doctrine's conformity with moral democratic realism. The first is the fundamental purpose of American foreign policy since its inception: to ensure the integrity and vitality of a free society "founded upon the dignity and worth of the individual." The second premise is that the cardinal virtue of prudence (the right reason about things to be done) must be the standard for determining the best practicable American grand strategy. In Defense of the Bush Doctrine provides a broader historical context for the post–September 11 American foreign policy that will transform world politics well into the future. Kaufman connects the Bush Doctrine and current issues in American foreign policy, such as how the U.S. should deal with China, to the deeper tradition of American diplomacy. Drawing from positive lessons as well as cautionary tales from the past, Kaufman concludes that moral democratic realism offers the most compelling framework for American grand strategy, as it expands the democratic zone of peace and minimizes the number and gravity of threats the United States faces in the modern world. |
Из књиге
Резултати 1-5 од 51
... national security in the changing circumstances of the twentieth century. after World War II the truman administration devised a new grand strategy of vigilant containment in response to the emergence of the Soviet threat and the advent ...
... national Security Council 68 (nSC 68), written in 1950, which laid out the rationale for u.S. strategy for much of the Cold War: “our determination to maintain the essential freedoms as set forth in the Constitution and the Bill of ...
... national interest to sustain. There is, of course, much that is legitimate to criticize about the way the united States intervened in World War I in general and about the diplomacy of President Woodrow Wilson in particular: his utopian ...
... national Security Council in april 1950. This document crystallized and dictated the main lines of american foreign and defense policy for much of the Cold War, which were in the long term “to foster fundamental change in the nature of ...
... national Security advisor Brent Scowcroft and former Secretary of State Lawrence eagleberger, worked directly with Kissinger during the ford administration, though Kissinger dissented from his former colleagues by supporting the ...
Садржај
1 | |
5 | |
23 | |
51 | |
4 The Perils of Liberal Multilateralism | 63 |
5 Moral Democratic Realism | 87 |
6 Moral Democratic Realism and the Endgame of the Cold War | 101 |
7 The Bush Doctrine and Iraq | 125 |
Beyond the War on Terror | 143 |
Epilogue | 153 |
Appendix | 157 |
Notes | 185 |
Bibliography | 217 |
Index | 241 |