prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. State of Georgia v. Brailsford et al., 2 Dall. 402. Chisholm, ex., v. State of Georgia, 2 Dall. 419. Hollingsworth et al. v. Virginia, 3 Dall. 378. Cohen v. Virginia, 6 Wh. 264. Osborn v. United States Bank, 9 Wh. 738. United States v. The Planters' Bank, 9 Wh. 904. The Governor of Georgia v. Juan Madrazo, 1 Pet. 110. Cherokee Nation v. State of Georgia, 5 Pet. 1. Briscoe v. The Bank of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, 11 Pet. 257. Curran v. State of Arkansas et al., 15 How. 304. New Hampshire v. Louisiana, 108 U. S. 76. Virginia Coupon Cases, 114 U. S. 270. Hagood v. Southern, 117 U. S. 52. In re Ayres, 123 U. S. 443. Lincoln County v. Luning, 133 U. S. 529. Coupon Cases, 135 U. S. 662. Pennoyer v. MeConnaughy, 140 U. S. 1. In re Taylor, 149 U. S. 164. Reagan v. Farmers'

Loan and Trust Co., 154 U. S. 362. Reagan v. Mercantile Trust Co., 154

U. S. 413. Scott v. Donald, 165 U. S. 58.

Tindal v. Wesley, 167 U. S. 204. Smyth v. Ames, 169 U. S. 466. Fitts v. McGhee, 172 U. S. 516. Prout v. Starr, 188 U. S. 537.

ARTICLE XII.*

The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as VicePresident, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate; The President of the Senate shall, in presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;-The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House

*The twelfth amendment to the Constitution of the United States was proposed to the legislatures of the several States by the Eighth Congress, on the 12th of December, 1803, in lieu of the original third paragraph of the first section of the second article; and was declared in a proclamation of the Secretrry of State, dated the 25th of September, 1804, to have been ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the States.

of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President. The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of twothirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

ARTICLE XIII.*

SECTION 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

SECTION 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393. White v. Hart, 13 Wall. 646. Osborn v. Nicholson, 13 Wall. 654. Slaughterhouse Cases, 16 Wall. 36. Ex parte Virginia, 100 U. S. 339. Civil Rights Case, 109 U. S. 3. Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U. S. 537. Robertson v. Baldwin, 165 U. S. 275. Patterson v. Bark Eudora, 190 U. S. 169.

*The thirteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States was proposed to the legislatures of the several States by the Thirty-eighth Congress, on the 1st of February, 1865, and was declared, in a proclamation of the Secretary of State, dated the 18th of December, 1865, to have been ratified by the legislatures of twenty-seven of the thirty-six States, viz. Illinois, Rhode Island, Michigan, Maryland, New York, West Virginia, Maine, Kansas, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Ohio, Missouri, Nevada, Indiana, Louisiana, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Vermont, Tennessee, Arkansas, Connecticut, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Alabama, North Carolina and Georgia.

ARTICLE XIV.*

SECTION 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privi

*The fourteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States was proposed to the legislatures of the several States by the Thirty-ninth Congress, on the 16th of June, 1866. On the 21st of July, 1868, Congress adopted and transmitted to the Department of State a concurrent resolution declaring that "the legislatures of the States of Connecticut, Tennessee, NewJersey, Oregon, Vermont, New York, Ohio, Illinois, West Virginia, Kansas, Maine, Nevada, Missouri, Indiana, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Nebraska, Iowa, Arkansas, Florida, North Carolina, Alabama, South Carolina and Louisiana, being three-fourths and more of the several States of the Union, have ratified the fourteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States, duly proposed by two-thirds of each House of the Thirty-ninth Congress: Therefore Resolved, That said fourteenth article is hereby declared to be a part of the Constitution of the United States, and it shall be duly promulgated as such by the Secretary of State." The Secretary of State accordingly issued a proclamation, dated the 28th of July, 1868, declaring that the proposed fourteenth amendment had been ratified, in the manner hereafter mentioned, by the legislatures of thirty of the thirty-six States, viz.: Connecticut, June 30, 1866; New Hampshire, July 7, 1866; Tennessee, July 19, 1866; New Jersey, September 11, 1866 (and the legislature of the same State passed a resolution in April, 1868, to withdraw its consent to it); Oregon, September 19, 1866; Vermont, November 9, 1866; Georgia rejected it November 13, 1866, and ratified it July 21, 1868; North Carolina rejected it December 4, 1866, and ratified it July 4, 1868; South Carolina rejected it December 20, 1866, and ratified it July 9, 1868; New York ratified it January 10, 1867; Ohio ratified it January 11, 1867 (and the legislature of the same State passed a resolution in January, 1868, to withdraw its consent to it); Illinois ratified it January 15, 1867; West Virginia, January 16, 1867; Kansas, January 18, 1867; Maine, January 19, 1867; Nevada, January 22, 1867; Missouri, January 26, 1867; Indiana, January 20, 1867; Minnesota, February 1, 1867; Rhode Island, February 7, 1867; Wisconsin, February 13, 1867; Pennsylvania, February 13, 1867; Michigan, February 15, 1867; Massachusetts, March 20, 1867; Nebraska, June 15, 1867; Iowa, April 3, 1868; Arkansas, April 6, 1868; Florida, June 9, 1868; Louisiana, July 9, 1868, and Alabama, July 13, 1868. Georgia again ratified the amendment February 2, 1870. Texas rejected it November 1, 1866, and ratified it February 18, 1870. Virginia rejected it January 19, 1867, and ratified it October 8, 1869. The amendment was rejected by Kentucky, January 10, 1867; by Delaware, February 8, 1867; by Maryland, March 23, 1867, and was not afterwards ratified by either State.

leges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U. S. 303. Virginia v. Rivers, 100 U. S. 313. Ex parte Virginia, 100 U. S. 339. Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U. S. 22. Civil Rights Cases, 109 U. S. 3. Louisiana v. New Orleans, 109 U. S. 285. Hurtado v. California, 110 U. S. 516. Hagar v. Reclamation Dist., 111 U. S. 701. Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U. S. 94. Head v. Amoskeag Mfg. Co., 113 U.

City, 113 U. S. 506. land, 114 U. S. 606. Holt, 115 U. S. 620.

Dow v.

S. 9. Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U. S. 27. Provident Institution v. Jersey Soon Hing v. Crowley, 113 U. S. 703. Wurts v. HoagKy. R. Rd. Tax Cases, 115 U. S. 321. Campbell v. Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252. Stone v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Co., 116 U. S. 307. Arrowsmith v. Harmoning, 118 U. S. 194. Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U. S. 356. Santa Clara Co. v. S. Pacific R. Rd., 118 U. S. 394. Phila. Fire Assn. v. N. Y., 119 U. S. 110. Schmidt v. Cobb, 119 U. S. 286. Baldwin v, Frank, 119 U. S. 678. Hayes v. Missouri, 120 U. S. 68. Church v. Kelsey, 121 U. S. 282. Pembina Mining Co. v. Penna., 125 U. S. 181. Spencer v. Merchant, 125 U. S. 345. Beidelman, 125 U. S. 680. Bank of Redemption v. Boston, 125 U. S. 60. Ro Bards v. Lamb, 127 U. S. 58. Mo. Pac. Rwy. Co. v. Mackey, 127 U. S. 205. Minneapolis and St. Louis Rwy. v. Herrick, 127 U. $. 210. Powell v. Penna., 127 U. S. 678. Kidd v. Pearson, 128 U. S. 1. Nashville, Chattanooga, &c. Rwy. v. Alabama, 128 U. S. 96. Walston v. Navin, 128 U. S. 578. Minneapolis and St. Louis Rwy. v. Beckwith, 129 U. S. 26. Dent v. West Va., 129 U. S. 114. Huling v. Kaw Valley Rwy. and Improvement Co., 130 U. S. 559. Freeland v. Williams, 131 U. S. 405. Cross v. North Carolina, 132 U. S. 131. Pennie v. Reis, 132 U. S. 464. Sugg v. Thornton, 132 U. S. 524. Davis v. Beason, 133 U. S. 333., Ellenbecker v. Plymouth Co., 134 U. S. 31. Bell Gap R. Rd. Co. v. Penna., 134 U. S. 232. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Rwy. v. Minnesota, 134 U. S. 418. Home Ins. Co. v. New York, 134 U. S. 594. Louisville & Nashville R. Rd. Co. v. Woodson, 134 U. S. 614. Home Ins. Co. v. N. Y., 134 U. S. 594. Leisy v. Hardin, 135 U. S. 100. In re Kemmler, 136 U. S. 436. York v. Texas, 137 U. S. 15. Crowley v. Christensen, 137 U. S. 89. Wheeler v. Jackson, 137 U. S. 245. Holden v. Minnesota, 137 U. S. 483. In re Converse, 137 U. S. 624. Caldwell . Texas, 187 U. S. 692. Kauffman v. Wootters, 138 U. S. 285. Leslper v. Texas, 139 U. S. 462. In re Manning, 139 U. S. 504. Maba v. Louisiana, 139 U. S. 621. In re Duncan, 139 U. S. 449. In re Shibuya Jugiro, 139 U. S. 291. Lent v. Tillson, 140 U. S. 316. New Orleans v. N. O. Water W'ks, 142 U. S. 79. McElvaine v. Brush, 142 U. S. 155. Kaukauna v. Water Power Co. v. Miss. Canal Co., 142 U. 254. Charlotte, Augusta & Col. R. Rd. Co. v. Gibbes, 142 U. S. 386. Pacific Ex. Co. v. Siebert, 142 U. S. 339. Horn Silver Mining Co. v. N. Y., 143 U. S. 305. Budd v. N. Y., 143 U. S. 517. Schwab v. Berggren, 143 U. S. 442. Fielden v. Illinois, 143 U. S. 452. N. Y. v. Squire, 144 U. S. 175. Brown v. Smart, 144 U. S. 454. McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U. S. 1. Morley v. Lake Shore & Mich. Southern Ry. Co.,

146 U. S. 162. Hallinger v. Davis, 146 U. S. 314. Yesler v. Washington Harbor Line Comsrs., 146 U. S. 646. Butler v. Goreley, 146 U. S. 303. Southern Pacific Co. v. Denton, 146 U. S. 202. Thorington v. Montgomery, 147 U. S. 490. Giozza v. Tiernan, 148 U. S. 657. Paulsen v. Portland, 149 U. S. 30. Minn. & St. L. Rwy. Co. v. Emmons, 149 U. S. 364. Columbus So. Rwy. Co. v. Wright, 151 U. S. 470. In re Frederick, 149 U. S. 70. McNulty v. Calif., 149 U. S. 645. Lees v. U. S., 150 U. S. 476. Lawton v. Steele, 152 U. S. 133. Montana Co. v. St. Louis Mining Co., 152 U. S. 160. Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 377. McKane v. Durston, 153 U. S. 684. Marchant v. Penna. R. R. Co.. 153 U. S. 380. Brass v. Stoeser, 153 U. S. 391. Scott v. McNeal, 154 U. S. 34. Reagan v. Far. Loan & Trust Co., 154 U. S. 362. P., C., C. & St L. R. R. Co. v. Backus, 154 U. S. 421. Interstate Com. Comsn. v. Brimson, 154 U.S. 447. Reagan v. Mercantile Trust Co., 154 U. S. 447. Pearce v. Texas, 155 U. S. 311. Pittsburg & So. Coal Co. v. La., 156 U. S. 590. Andrews v.

Central Land

Swartz, 156 U. S. 272. St. L. & S. F. Rwy. Co. v. Gill, 156 U. S. 649. Stevens, admr. v. Nichols, 157 U. S. 370. Bergemann v. Becker, 157 U. S. 655. Quarles v. Butler, 158 U. S. 532. Gray v. Connecticut, 159 U. S. 174. Co. v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103. Moore v. Missouri, 159 U. S. 673. Winona & St. Peter Land Co. v. Minn., 159 U. S. 528. Iowa Cent. Ry. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389. Eldridge v. Trezevant, 160 U. S. 452. Laing v. Rigney, 160 U. S. 531. Gibson v. Miss. 162 U. S. 565. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Taggart, 163 U. S. 1. Lowe v. Kansas, 163 U. S. 81. Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U. S. 537. Talton v. Mayes, 163 U. S. 376. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. v. Nebraska, 164 U. S. 403. Covington, &c. Turnpike Co. v. Sandford, 164 U. S. 578. St. Louis, &c. Ry. Co. v. Mathews, 165 U. S. 1. Gulf, &c. Ry. Co. v. Ellis, 165 U. S. 150. Jones v. Brim, 165 U. S. 180. Adams Ex. Co. v. Ohio, 165 U. S. 194. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Indiana, 165 U. S. 304. Allgeyer v. Louisiana, 165 U. S. 578. Allen v. Georgia, 166 U. S. 138. Chicago, &c. R. R. Co. v. Chicago, 166 U. S. 226. Gladson v. Minn., 166 U. S. 427. Sentell v. New Orleans, &c. R. R. Co., 166 U. S. 698. Davis v. Mass., 167 U. S. 43. Turner v. New York, 168 U. S. 90. Hodgson v. Vermont, 168 U. S. 262. Nobles v. Georgia, 168 U. S. 398. McHenry v. Alford, 168 U. S. 651. Holden v. Hardy, 169 U. S. 366. Savings & Loan Society v. Multnomah County, 169 U. S. 421. Smyth v. Ames, 169 U. S. 466. Wilson v. North Carolina, 169 U. S. 586. U. S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649. Williams v. Miss., 170 U. S. 213. Galveston &c. Ry. Co. v. Texas, 170 U. S. 226. Magoun v. Ill. Trust & Savings Bank, 170 U. S. 283. Williams v. Eggleston, 170 U. S. 304. Tinsley v. Anderson, 171 U. S. 101. King v. Mullins, 171 U. S. 404. New York v. Roberts, 171 U.S. 658. Meyer v. Richmond, 172 U. S. 82. Blake v. McClung, 172 U. S. 239. Orient Ins. Co. v. Daggs, 172 U. S. 557. Wilson v. Eureka City, 173 U. S. 32. Central Loan & Trust Co. v. Campbell Commission Co., 173 U. S. 84. Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U. S. 193. St. Louis, &c. Ry. Co. v. Paul, 173 U. S. 404. Henderson Bridge Co. v. Henderson City, 173 U. S. 592. Lake Shore, &c. Co. v. Smith, 173 U. S. 684. Atchison, &c. R. R. Co. v. Matthews, 174 U. S. 96. Brown v. N. J., 175 U. S. 172. Tullis v. Lake Erie, &c. R. R. Co., 175 U. S. 348. Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education, 175 U S. 528. Bolln v. Nebraska, 176 U. S. 83. Clark v. Kansas