The Literature of Satire
Cambridge University Press, 12. 2. 2004. - 327 страница
The Literature of Satire is an accessible but sophisticated and wide-ranging study of satire from the classics to the present in plays, novels and the press as well as in verse. In it Charles Knight analyses the rhetorical problems created by satire's complex relations to its community, and examines how it exploits the genres it borrows. He argues that satire derives from an awareness of the differences between appearance, ideas and discourse. Knight provides illuminating readings of such satirists familiar and unfamiliar as Horace, Lucian, Jonson, Molière, Swift, Pope, Byron, Flaubert, Ostrovsky, Kundera, and Rushdie. This broad-ranging examination sheds light on the nature and functions of satire as a mode of writing, as well as on theoretical approaches to it. It will be of interest to scholars interested in literary theory as well as those specifically interested in satire.
Шта други кажу - Напишите рецензију
Нисмо пронашли ниједну рецензију на уобичајеним местима.
Друга издања - Прикажи све
action actual allows alternative appearance argues asserts attack audience becomes behavior Book central characteristic characters claims communication complex concern connections context contrast creates critical culture defining derives describes discourse distinction effect elements emergence English example exile fact false fiction figure force function further genres Hence historical human idea identify identity images imagined imitation implies important individual interest interpretation ironic issues Kraus Kraus’s language lies lines linguistic literary literature London meaning metaphor moral moves nationalism nature novel observation ofthe particular past pattern performance play poem political position possibilities present problem provides question readers reading relationship replaced represented responsibility reveal rhetorical role satire satirist seeks seems sense sexual Shame shifting significant social speaker speech Steele structure Studies suggests Swift takes transformation turn University Press values victim women writing