PAGE THE NEW YORK CONTENTS R 1987 L Chapter to Fundamental Causes of the War - 1. General Factors; II. Militarism and Armaments; III. Failure of the Hague Conferences; IV. Special Subjects of International Conflict; Chapter II. Historical Background of the War - - - 1. Foundation and Character of the German Empire; II. The Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente; III. Three Diplomatic Crises; IV. Bagdad Railroad and Mittel-Europa; V. Tripolitan and Balkan Wars. Chapter III. Indications that Germany and Austria Planned 1. Austria Proposes an Attack on Serbia; II. Secret Military Report on German Army; III. Changed Attitude of the Kaiser; IV. German Public Opinion; V. Extraordinary Military Measures of Germany; VI. Conclusion. Chapter IV. The Austro-Serbian Controversy - - - I. Prior Relations of Serbia, Austria and Russia; II. The Serajevo Assassination; III. Austrian Note to Serbia; IV. Serbian Reply; V. Austria Declares War on Serbia ; VI. Conclusions. Chapter V. Failure of Diplomacy to Avert War - 1. Outline of Events, July 21 to August 5, 1914; II. Proposals for Preserving Peace; III. German Ultimatums and Declarations of War against Russia and France; IV. German Responsibility for the War. Chapter VI. Violation of Belgium's Neutrality Brings in I. Why Great Britain Was Expected to Stay Out; II. British Diplomacy and the War; III. Neutrality of Luxemburg and of Belgium Violated; IV. Great Britain Enters the War. Chapter VII. The War Spreads — Character of the War - 1. Other States Enter the War; II. World-wide Character of the War; III. Innovations in Warfare; IV. Examples of German Ruthlessness and Vio- lations of International Law; V. Summary and Explanation of German Policy. Chapter VIII. The United States Enters the War - - I. Struggle to Maintain Neutrality; II. From Neutrality .to War; III. Summary of Reasons for Entering the War. Chapter IX. Course of the War - - I. Campaign of 1914; II. Campaign of 1915; III. Campaign of 1916; Chapter X. Proposals for Peace; Will This Be the Last War? I. Summary of States at War in 1917; II. American Aims in the War ; III. Various Peace Proposals ; IV. Will This Be the Last Great War ? · Topical Outline of the War BY SAMUEL B. HARDING, PROFESSOR OF EUROPEAN HISTORY IN INDIANA UNIVERSITY. PREPARED IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE NATIONAL BOARD FOR HISTORICAL SERVICE AND THE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC INFORMATION.* I. FUNDAMENTAL CAUSES OF THE WAR. 1. GENERAL FACTORS. 1. The constitution of the German Empire permits its for oign policy to be determined by the Emperor alone, who is at the same time, by “divine right,” King of Prussia—the State which possesses an overwhelming territorial, political, and military predominance in the Empire. “The Emperor declares war with the consent of the Bundesrat, the assent of the Reichstag not being required. Not even the Bundesrat need be consulted if the war is defensive, and as the Hohenzollerns have always claimed to make defensive warfare it is not surprising that even the unrepresentative Bundesrat was officially informed about the present war three days after the Emperor declared it.” (Charles D. Hazen, The Government of Germany; Committee on Public Information publication.) (See War Cyclopedia, under "Autocracy," "Kaiserism," “ William II.”) 2. Profit derived from war in the past by Prussia (Germany). (a) Through increase of territory (cf. maps). justification of the “ blood and iron ” policy of national industry” of Prussia. “ The Great Elector laid the foundations of Prussia's power by successful and deliberately incurred wars. Frederick the Great followed in the footsteps of his glorious ancestor. . . . None of the wars which he fought had been forced upon him; none of thom did he postpone as long as possible. ... The lessons of history thus confirm the view that wars which have been deliberately provoked by far-seeing statesmen have had the happiest results." (Bernhardi, Germany and the Next War, 1911.) Gormany's demand for “a place in the sun." (ax Meaning of the Kaiser's phrase (" a place in the sun”) not clear. It covers vaguely colonies, commerce, and influence in international affairs in proportion to Germany's population, industrial importance, and military power. (b) Obstacles. The German Empire was a late comer in the family of nations; the best regions for colonization and exploitation, especially in the temperate zones, were already occupied by other Powers. (6) Examples of the demand. (See Conquest and Kultur, secs. 6, 10; War Cyclopedia, under “Place in the Sun," " Pan-Germanism," oto.) “We need colonies, and more colonies, than we bavo already, to give vent to our surplus energies without losing them and to make the motherland economi. cally independent." (Manifesto of the Colonial League.) “We need a fleet strong enough not only to protect the colonies we now have, but to bring about the noquisition of others." (Manifesto of the Navy League.) “A progressive nation like ours needs territory, and if this cannot be obtained by peaceful means, it must be obtained by war. It is the object of the Defense Association [Wehrverein) to create this sontiment.” (Lieut.-General Wrochem in speech to the Wehrverein in March, 1913.) “Without doubt this acquisition of new lands will not take place without war. What world power was ever established without bloody struggles ?” (Al. brecht Wirth, Volkstum und Weltmacht in der Geschichte, 1904. Quoted by Andler, Le Pangermanisme continentale, 1915, p. 308.) “It is only by relying on our good German sword that we can hope, to conquer that place in the sun which rightly belongs to us, and which no one will yield to us voluntarily. ... Till the world comes to an end, the ultimate decision must rest with the sword.” (German Crown Prince, in Introduction to Germany in Arms, 1913.) 4. Biological argument for war. (a) Darwin's theory of the “struggle for existence " as a chief factor in the evolution of spocios. (b) Development in Germany of the theory that States are of necessity engaged in such a “strug gle for existence.” (c) Hence war is an "ordinance of God for the weed ing out of weak and incompetent individuals and States." Corollary: “Might makes right.” (d) Examples of such arguments from Treitschke, Bernhardi, etc. (See Conquest and Kultur, seo. 1, 2, 4; War Cyclopedia, under“ Bernhardi,” “Treitschke," “War, German View;" Vernon Kellogg, “Headquarters' Nights,” in Atlantic Monthly for August, 1917.) “War is a biological necessity of the first importance, a regulative element in the life of mankind which cannot be dispensed with, since without it an unhealthy development will follow, which excludes every advancement of the race, and thereforo all real civilization. ... 'To supplant or be supplanted is the essence of life,' says Goethe, and the strong life gains the upper hand. The law of the stronger holds good everywhere. Those forms survive which are able to procure themselves tho most favorablo conditions of life, and to assert themselvos in tho universal economy of Nature. The weakor succumb. ... “Might gives the right to occupy or to conquer. Might is at once the supreme right, and the dispute This outline was prepared with the active aid of the Committee on Tablie Information (Department of Civic and Educational Co-opera. tion), 10 Jackson Place, Washington, D. C. Frequent reference is made herein to the publications of this committee, which with . few anoptions are distributed tree upon application Copyright, 1917, McKinley Publishing Company. |