This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. Transactions - Страница 115написао/ла Maryland State Bar Association - 1911Пуни преглед - О овој књизи
| Massachusetts. Department of Labor and Industries. Division of Statistics - 1905 - 378 страница
...Holmes, in his separate dissenting opinion, goes even more fundamently into the question at issue: " ' This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. ... It is settled by various decisions of this court that State constitutions and State laws may regulate... | |
| National Conference on Social Welfare - 1910 - 716 страница
...majority of the Court, and it was the occasion of a most striking dissenting opinion by Justice Holmes. He says : "This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country do not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study... | |
| American Academy of Political and Social Science - 1911 - 346 страница
...these minority opinions is his dissent in the New York bake-shop case,3 in which, inter alia, he said, "This case is decided upon an economic theory which...it further and long before making up my mind. But / do not conceive that to be my duty, because I strongly believe that my agreement or disagreement... | |
| George Gorham Groat - 1911 - 432 страница
...the majority opinion of the United States supreme court which held against the New York Bakeshop law, This case is decided upon an economic theory which...does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agree with that theory, I should desire to study it further and long before making up my mind. But... | |
| 1912 - 1526 страница
...paternalism. Mr. Justice Holmes, in his dissenting opinion in Lochner c. New York ( 198 US, 45, p. 75 ) , says : This case is decided upon an economic theory...country does not entertain. If It were a question of whether I agreed with that theory I should desire to study it further and long before making up... | |
| New York (State). Dept. of Labor - 1912 - 1080 страница
...their living, are mere meddlesome interferences with the rights of the individual "; and Justice Holmes says " This case is decided upon an economic theory...which a large part of the country does not entertain," and again " But a constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory, whether of paternalism... | |
| Ohio. Courts - 1912 - 740 страница
...decided from an economic standpoint. " He says that "if it were a question whether I agreed with the economic theory, which a large part of the country does not entertain, I should desire to study it further and long before making up my mind." Again he says: "It is settled... | |
| Mary Van Kleeck - 1913 - 328 страница
...their living, are mere meddlesome interferences with the rights of the individual"; and Justice Holmes says "this case is decided upon an economic theory...which a large part of the country does not entertain," and again "but a constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory, whether of paternalism... | |
| 1913 - 1390 страница
...their living, are mere meddlesome interferences with the rights of the individual ;" and Justice Holmes says, "This case is decided upon an economic theory...which a large part of the country does not entertain," and again : "But a Constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory, whether of... | |
| |