 | Michigan. Constitutional Convention - 1867 - 944 страница
...the amendment by striking out the first sentence of the 'section, and inserting in lieu thereof the words, "no person shall be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense." The amendment of Mr. Blackmail was withdrawn. The question being on the amendment of Mr. Stoughton, it... | |
 | 1915 - 1128 страница
...386-109; Dec. Dig. § 200.*] 2. CRIMINAL LAW (§ 200*)— FORMES JEOPARDY — IDENTITY or OFFENSE. The provision of the Constitution relating to jeopardy...indictment, and hence the defense of jeopardy must fail. [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent Dig. {{ 347, 386-409; Dec. Dig. 200.*] (Additional... | |
 | 1887 - 956 страница
...not again be tried after such two trials. That section provides, among other things, as follows: "No person shall * * * be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense." The case of the State v. McCord, 8 Kan. 232, is however cited as authority for the ruling of the court... | |
 | 1913 - 1390 страница
...FORSIER JEOPABDY— IDENTITY OP OFFENSES— "SAME OFFENSE." Under Const, art 1, Í 14, providing that no person shall be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense, the "same offense" is not one of the same nature or a similar offense, but the identical offense. [Ed.... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, Edwin Burritt Smith, Martin L. Newell - 1892 - 702 страница
...must b3 based upon the declaration in our bill of rights, Sec. 10, Constitution of 1870, " that no person shall be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense." The jeopardy mentioned must bo such in legal contemplation, and the constitutional privilege may be waived... | |
 | 1892 - 1170 страница
...punishment upon conviction for a second offense is not in violation of a constitutional provision that no person shall be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense." The opinion in that case cites Rand v. Com., 9 Grat. 742, in which it was held that a similar statute in... | |
 | William John Tossell - 1909 - 958 страница
...those counts would be a violation of Art. 1, Sec. 10 of the bill of rights, which provides that no person shall be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense. The verdict of the jury did not in express terms acquit the defendant of the crime charged under the first... | |
 | 1898 - 444 страница
...of diverse views among lawyers as well as laymen. While it is a well-known principle of law that "no person shall be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense." the application of the principle appears to be not always a problem of easy solution. In the Thorn case... | |
 | 1905 - 984 страница
...1 Blsh. Or. Law, $ 1060). To entitle a party to the benefit of the constitutional provision that no person shall "be twice put In jeopardy for the same offense," the second jeopardy must be for the same offense. The principle on which the numerous authorities quoted... | |
 | Ohio. Courts - 1909 - 692 страница
...counts would be a violation of Section 10 of Article 1, of the Bill of Rights, which provides that no person shall be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense. The verdict of the jury did not in express terms acquit the defendant of the crime charged under the first... | |
| |
Constitution, having to do with the rights of the persons accused of crime, now provides that no person shall be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense. 
