Kant's Theory of Knowledge: An Analytical IntroductionOxford University Press, 4. 11. 2004. - 280 страница The Critique of Pure Reason is Kant's acknowledged masterpiece, in which he tackles the question of how we can possibly have knowledge that does not rest on experience (a priori knowledge). The first half of the Critique advances a constructive theory of human cognition and defends the possibility of human knowledge against the skeptical empiricism of Hume. These sections of the Critique are difficult for beginners and for advanced students alike. While there exist many scholarly works discussing the Critique on an advanced level, this book is explicitly designed to be read alongside the text by first-time readers of Kant. Dicker makes Kant's views and arguments as accessible as possible without oversimplifying them, and synthesizes the views of contemporary scholars. Kant's Theory of Knowledge will be useful to both undergraduate and graduate students struggling with this notoriously difficult yet deeply influential thinker. |
Из књиге
Резултати 1-5 од 32
Страница 3
... philosopher who synthesized rationalism and empiricism. Of course, this cannot mean that Kant simply adopted the central views of both the rationalists and the empiricists, for even within each of these schools of thought there are ...
... philosopher who synthesized rationalism and empiricism. Of course, this cannot mean that Kant simply adopted the central views of both the rationalists and the empiricists, for even within each of these schools of thought there are ...
Страница 7
... philosophers often define these terms as they apply to propositions, and this is the way Kant himself uses the term “a priori” in his simplifying question, except that he applies it to “judgments” instead of “propositions.” But as ...
... philosophers often define these terms as they apply to propositions, and this is the way Kant himself uses the term “a priori” in his simplifying question, except that he applies it to “judgments” instead of “propositions.” But as ...
Страница 8
... philosophers would hold that no statement is knowable just by experience because of a point made by none other than Kant. This is the point, already mentioned, that thinking that embodies knowledge requires both concepts and something ...
... philosophers would hold that no statement is knowable just by experience because of a point made by none other than Kant. This is the point, already mentioned, that thinking that embodies knowledge requires both concepts and something ...
Страница 10
... philosophers, following Saul Kripke, would say that scientific statements about “natural kinds,” like “water is H2O,” are a posteriori yet necessary.6 This raises complex issues that I cannot explore here. Suffice it to say that a ...
... philosophers, following Saul Kripke, would say that scientific statements about “natural kinds,” like “water is H2O,” are a posteriori yet necessary.6 This raises complex issues that I cannot explore here. Suffice it to say that a ...
Страница 11
... philosophers would define analyticity in a slightly different way from that given in D3. They would say that an analytic statement is one whose truth depends solely on logical laws and definitions. To illustrate, consider the statement ...
... philosophers would define analyticity in a slightly different way from that given in D3. They would say that an analytic statement is one whose truth depends solely on logical laws and definitions. To illustrate, consider the statement ...
Садржај
3 | |
2 GEOMETRY SPACE AND TRANSCENDENTAL IDEALISM | 26 |
3 CATEGORIES AND PRINCIPLES OF THE UNDERSTANDING | 49 |
THE TRANSCENDENTAL DEDUCTION | 84 |
THE ANALOGIES OF EXPERIENCE THE TWO TIMEORDERS AND THE BDEDUCTION | 112 |
SUBSTANCE | 145 |
CAUSALITY | 163 |
INTERACTION | 179 |
9 KANTS REFUTATION OF IDEALISM | 194 |
THE SCHEMATISM | 213 |
NOTES | 225 |
BIBLIOGRAPHY | 245 |
INDEX | 249 |
Друга издања - Прикажи све
Чести термини и фразе
Analogies of Experience analytic propositions answer appearances apprehended argues Axioms of Intuition B-Deduction Bounds of Sense categories of relation causal principle causally interact Central Argument chapter coexist conceive Critique of Pure David Hume determine distinct empirical empiricism enduring objects event example existence changes Experience is possible experiences are conceptualized follows form of judgment human Hume Hume’s Ibid idea intensive magnitude Jonathan Bennett Kant’s argument Kant’s Theory logical manifold of representations means metaphysical necessary condition notion objective time-order objective validity occurred one’s P. F. Strawson passage Paul Guyer perceive permanent philosophers posteriori premise proposition pure concepts Pure Reason question reference Refutation of Idealism rule-governed schematism Second Analogy seems series of existence spatial stand-in straight wood Strawson subjective substance theory substance2 suppose synthesis synthetic a priori Table of Judgments temporal order things Third Analogy tion Transcendental Deduction Transcendental Idealism true truth unified unity of consciousness Wolff
Референце за ову књигу
A Modern Introduction to Theology: New Questions for Old Beliefs Philip Kennedy Приказ није доступан - 2006 |