Kant's Theory of Knowledge: An Analytical IntroductionOxford University Press, 4. 11. 2004. - 280 страница The Critique of Pure Reason is Kant's acknowledged masterpiece, in which he tackles the question of how we can possibly have knowledge that does not rest on experience (a priori knowledge). The first half of the Critique advances a constructive theory of human cognition and defends the possibility of human knowledge against the skeptical empiricism of Hume. These sections of the Critique are difficult for beginners and for advanced students alike. While there exist many scholarly works discussing the Critique on an advanced level, this book is explicitly designed to be read alongside the text by first-time readers of Kant. Dicker makes Kant's views and arguments as accessible as possible without oversimplifying them, and synthesizes the views of contemporary scholars. Kant's Theory of Knowledge will be useful to both undergraduate and graduate students struggling with this notoriously difficult yet deeply influential thinker. |
Из књиге
Резултати 1-5 од 54
Страница xii
... propositions) are true (e.g., that there are objects which must be conceived as being other than the self, that every observable event has a cause, that all substances that can be known to coexist in space on the basis of ...
... propositions) are true (e.g., that there are objects which must be conceived as being other than the self, that every observable event has a cause, that all substances that can be known to coexist in space on the basis of ...
Страница xiii
... Propositions 14 The Plan of the Critical Philosophy and the Structure of the Critique 17 1.3.1 The Overall Structure of the Critique of Pure Reason 17 1.3.2 How the Major Sections of the Critique Relate to Kant's Simplifying Question 20 ...
... Propositions 14 The Plan of the Critical Philosophy and the Structure of the Critique 17 1.3.1 The Overall Structure of the Critique of Pure Reason 17 1.3.2 How the Major Sections of the Critique Relate to Kant's Simplifying Question 20 ...
Страница 7
... propositions or judgments. Letting p stand for any judgment or proposition, we can define the term “a priori” as follows: D1: p is a priori = df p can be known independently of experience. For example, the statements “1 + 1 = 2” and “No ...
... propositions or judgments. Letting p stand for any judgment or proposition, we can define the term “a priori” as follows: D1: p is a priori = df p can be known independently of experience. For example, the statements “1 + 1 = 2” and “No ...
Страница 8
... propositions or judgments, it can be defined this way: D2: p is a posteriori (empirical) = df p can be known only by ... proposition can be justified without appealing to particular facts that are known by experience or observation. 8 ...
... propositions or judgments, it can be defined this way: D2: p is a posteriori (empirical) = df p can be known only by ... proposition can be justified without appealing to particular facts that are known by experience or observation. 8 ...
Страница 9
... propositions, and judgments: necessity and strict universality (B 3–4). To see how this criterion is supposed to work, consider the proposition 'every even number is divisible by 2.' Its truth is necessary because there cannot be any ...
... propositions, and judgments: necessity and strict universality (B 3–4). To see how this criterion is supposed to work, consider the proposition 'every even number is divisible by 2.' Its truth is necessary because there cannot be any ...
Садржај
3 | |
2 GEOMETRY SPACE AND TRANSCENDENTAL IDEALISM | 26 |
3 CATEGORIES AND PRINCIPLES OF THE UNDERSTANDING | 49 |
THE TRANSCENDENTAL DEDUCTION | 84 |
THE ANALOGIES OF EXPERIENCE THE TWO TIMEORDERS AND THE BDEDUCTION | 112 |
SUBSTANCE | 145 |
CAUSALITY | 163 |
INTERACTION | 179 |
9 KANTS REFUTATION OF IDEALISM | 194 |
THE SCHEMATISM | 213 |
NOTES | 225 |
BIBLIOGRAPHY | 245 |
INDEX | 249 |
Друга издања - Прикажи све
Чести термини и фразе
Analogies of Experience analytic propositions answer appearances apprehended argues Axioms of Intuition B-Deduction Bounds of Sense categories of relation causal principle causally interact Central Argument chapter coexist conceive Critique of Pure David Hume determine distinct empirical empiricism enduring objects event example existence changes Experience is possible experiences are conceptualized follows form of judgment human Hume Hume’s Ibid idea intensive magnitude Jonathan Bennett Kant’s argument Kant’s Theory logical manifold of representations means metaphysical necessary condition notion objective time-order objective validity occurred one’s P. F. Strawson passage Paul Guyer perceive permanent philosophers posteriori premise proposition pure concepts Pure Reason question reference Refutation of Idealism rule-governed schematism Second Analogy seems series of existence spatial stand-in straight wood Strawson subjective substance theory substance2 suppose synthesis synthetic a priori Table of Judgments temporal order things Third Analogy tion Transcendental Deduction Transcendental Idealism true truth unified unity of consciousness Wolff
Референце за ову књигу
A Modern Introduction to Theology: New Questions for Old Beliefs Philip Kennedy Приказ није доступан - 2006 |