Albany Law Journal, Том 40Weed, Parsons & Company, 1890 |
Из књиге
Резултати 1-5 од 85
Страница 2
... brought before him , and that he should not exhibit the same bad temper which in many cases is at the bottom of the offenses which he is called on to punish . It must any- be borne in mind too that the removal of such a Mr. James M ...
... brought before him , and that he should not exhibit the same bad temper which in many cases is at the bottom of the offenses which he is called on to punish . It must any- be borne in mind too that the removal of such a Mr. James M ...
Страница 10
... brought into court as a corporation to answer an al- legation that it is not and never was a corporation . When a corporation is brought into court by its cor- porate name its existence is thereby admitted . " In People v . Stanford ...
... brought into court as a corporation to answer an al- legation that it is not and never was a corporation . When a corporation is brought into court by its cor- porate name its existence is thereby admitted . " In People v . Stanford ...
Страница 11
... brought to the attention of the court and passed upon . Lean- ing in the same direction is State v . Weatherby , 45 Mo. 17 . In People v . Riverside , 66 Cal . 288 , the court appears to have decided the question , but the decision is ...
... brought to the attention of the court and passed upon . Lean- ing in the same direction is State v . Weatherby , 45 Mo. 17 . In People v . Riverside , 66 Cal . 288 , the court appears to have decided the question , but the decision is ...
Страница 30
... brought home to his knowledge , as it was treated in argument , the question is whether it is valid or not . It is very generally conceded that tele- graph companies may limit their common - law liabil- ity by express contract , and ...
... brought home to his knowledge , as it was treated in argument , the question is whether it is valid or not . It is very generally conceded that tele- graph companies may limit their common - law liabil- ity by express contract , and ...
Страница 34
... brought was given for these very differences ; and therefore Wilson himself could not have enforced pay- ment of it . Then the security was indorsed over to the plaintiff , he knowing of the illegality of the con- tract between Wilson ...
... brought was given for these very differences ; and therefore Wilson himself could not have enforced pay- ment of it . Then the security was indorsed over to the plaintiff , he knowing of the illegality of the con- tract between Wilson ...
Друга издања - Прикажи све
Чести термини и фразе
affirmed agent alleged appear appellant applied authority Bank bigamy cause of action charge cited civil Civil Procedure claim Code common law Constitution contract conviction corporation counsel court of equity creditors crime criminal damages David Dudley Field death debt decision declared defendant defendant's discharge duty evidence execution executor fact fendant fraud ground habeas corpus held husband indictment injury intention judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury justice land lawyers legislative Legislature liable licensed to deal Lord mens rea ment negligence offense opinion owner party payment person plaintiff present principle prosecution punishment purpose question Railroad Railroad Co reason recover respondent rule set-off statement statute street supra Supreme Court telegraph testator testimony thing tion trial trial by jury trust United usury void wife witness words York
Популарни одломци
Страница 277 - There must be reasonable evidence of negligence, but where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant that the accident arose from want of care.
Страница 158 - EACH branch of the legislature, as well as the governor and Council, shall have authority to require the opinions of the justices of the Supreme Judicial Court, upon important questions of law, and upon solemn occasions.
Страница 234 - Every such action shall be brought by and In the names of the personal representatives of such deceased person, and the amount recovered In every such action shall be for the exclusive benefit of the widow and next of kin...
Страница 33 - That all contracts or agreements, whether by parol or in writing, by way of gaming or wagering, shall be null and void ; and that no suit shall be brought or maintained in any Court of Law or Equity for recovering any sum of money or valuable thing alleged to be won upon any wager, or which shall have been deposited in the bands of any person to abide the event on which any wager shall have been made...
Страница 332 - That every such action shall be for the benefit of the wife, husband, parent and child of the person whose death shall have been so caused...
Страница 112 - That there shall be no establishment of any one religious sect in this province in preference to another ; and that no protestant inhabitant of this colony shall be denied the enjoyment of any civil right, merely on account of his religious principles...
Страница 65 - ... as by the known usage of trade, or the like, acquired a peculiar sense, distinct from the popular sense of the same words...
Страница 348 - No one shall be permitted to profit by his own fraud, or to take advantage of his own wrong, or to found any claim upon his own iniquity, or to acquire property by his own crime.
Страница 227 - For it is a general principle of the highest importance to the proper administration of justice that a judicial officer, in exercising the authority vested in him, shall be free to act upon his own convictions, without apprehension of personal consequences to himself.
Страница 266 - Suppose one believed that human sacrifices were a necessary part of religious worship, would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty to burn herself upon the funeral pile of her dead husband, would it be beyond the power of the civil government to prevent her carrying her belief into practice?