 | Virginia. General Assembly. House of Delegates - 1898 - 850 страница
...for the following reasons : Article 5, section 15, of the Constitution of Virginia, declares that " no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." and operate the same as common carriers; to construct wharves, docks, warehouses and elevators; to build... | |
 | Michigan - 1850 - 40 страница
...the final passage of all bills the vote shall be by ayes and nays, and entered on the journal § 20. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. No public act shall take effect or be in force until the expiration of ninety days from the end of... | |
 | Michigan. Constitutional Convention - 1850 - 990 страница
...final passage of all bills the vote shall be by ayes and nays, and entered on the journal. Sec. 20. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. No public act shall take effect or be in force until the expiration of ninety days from the end of... | |
 | Virginia - 1851 - 1348 страница
...his religious instructor, aud to make for his support such private contract as. be shall please. 16. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in it* title ; nor shall any law be revived or amended by reference to its title, but the act revived... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1892 - 830 страница
...attacked for the following reasons: 1. That it is contrary to article 4, § 20, of the Constitution, which says: " No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." 2. That it confers upon military officers the power of arbitrarily setting aside the authority of the... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1862 - 614 страница
...being in conflict with the first clause of the 20th section of Article IV. of the Constitution — " No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." — 5 La. Ann. Rep. 91; 6 La. Ann. Rep. 94 ; 11 La. Ann. Rep. 722; 13 La. Ann. Rep, 433; 5 Ind. 573;... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1886 - 744 страница
...four grounds, namely : First. That it is in conflict with the provision of the Constitution that " No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." Second. That it violates another provision of the Constitution, to wit : " No law shall be revised,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1891 - 776 страница
...the constitutional provision as claimed by defendant's counsel. This constitutional provision is — "No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." This provision requires that the title shall fairly indicate the general object of the law. Mr. Cooley,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1913 - 804 страница
...void under section 21 of article 5 of the Constitution of the State of Michigan, which provides : " No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." The title of the act is as follows : "An act to declare telephone lines and telephone companies within... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1897 - 824 страница
...The first objection is that it is repugnant to section 20, art. 4, of the Constitution, which reads, "No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." The objection is not sound. The title is sufficiently comprehensive. The one general object, which... | |
| |
No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title... 
