Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy
University of Michigan Press, 1996 - 257 страница
One of the central issues in democratic theory is the proper role of public opinion in the conduct of international affairs. The capacity of the public to make informed judgments about these complex issues which are often far removed from their experience has been questioned. In addition, the impact of public opinion on foreign policy-making has been debated. In Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy Ole Holsti addresses these crucial issues using extensive data on public attitudes and preferences on international affairs. Holsti concludes that although the American public is not well informed about many aspects of foreign affairs, its opinions are usually stable and reasonable reactions to real world events, are not lacking in structure, and can often have an important impact on foreign policies.
Holsti surveys changing perceptions of the effect of public opinion on foreign policy since World War I. According to Holsti, this war transformed the issue of public participation in foreign affairs from a theoretical into a practical one that many postwar leaders had to confront. World War II and its immediate aftermath are equally significant. The Vietnam War stimulated a new wave of theory and research that challenged many aspects of the post-World War II view of public opinion. The author assesses the hypothesis that the bipartisan foreign policy consensus of the post-World War II period has, during the past two decades, given way to sharp partisan cleavages, reinforced by ideological differences. The end of the Cold War has also raised new questions about public opinion and foreign policy.
Holsti explores the determinants of public opinion on foreign policy, the impact of gender, generation, education, religion, and race on foreign policy attitudes, and the relationship of the opinions of the general public to the opinions of leaders.
This book will be of interest to political scientists, historians, political psychologists, and anyone with an interest in American foreign policy and the domestic factors that may affect its formulation and implementation.
Ole Holsti is George V. Allen Professor of International Affairs, Duke University.
Шта други кажу - Напишите рецензију
Нисмо пронашли ниједну рецензију на уобичајеним местима.
The PostWorld War II Consensus
Challenges to the Postwar Consensus
други делови (6) нису приказани
Друга издања - Прикажи све
abroad According active administration affairs agreed agreement American analyses appear approval arms asked assess attitudes beliefs CCFR changes chapter Cold comparable conduct conservative consistently cooperation countries debates decades decision defense Democrats described developed differences domestic economic effective efforts elites emerged evidence example expressed favor findings five force foreign affairs foreign policy four FPLP Gallup gender goals groups Gulf ideological impact important increased indicate interests internationalism internationalists isolationists issues later leadership least less liberal limited major military opinion leaders oppose organizations partisan party peace percent period Persian policy issues political polling positions possible preferences President public opinion questions reasons relations Republicans responses revealed role Senate significant sources Soviet Union specific strong structure studies surveys threats tion trade troops undertakings United USSR Vietnam views whereas women