Congressional Limitation of Executive Orders: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Sixth Congress, First Session, on H.R. 3131, H. Con. Res. 30, and H.R. 2655, October 28, 1999
John D. Wright, Jr., United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law
U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000 - 87 страница
Шта други кажу - Напишите рецензију
Нисмо пронашли ниједну рецензију на уобичајеним местима.
Друга издања - Прикажи све
80 Stat action activities addition administration Advisory agency Amendment to Executive American American Heritage Rivers appropriate attempt August authority bill called Chairman challenge Committee Congress congressional Constitution COOPER create December decision delegated Department directives district duty effect emergency Employees enacted established example executive branch exercise existing February Federal force funds Further GEKAS going granted hearing House implement important issued Executive Order judicial June Justice Labor legislative limited look March means ment NADLER national emergency October parties person practical President Clinton Presidential order proclamations Prohibiting protect question regulations replacements Represented Respect result Rivers rules Secretary seizure Senate separation of powers September Service signing simply specific standing statement statute statutory Supreme Court Thank things tion tive United violated
Страница 36 - The doctrine of the separation of powers was adopted by the Convention of 1787, not to promote efficiency but to preclude the exercise of arbitrary power. The purpose was, not to avoid friction, but, by means of the inevitable friction incident to the distribution of the governmental powers among three departments, to save the people from autocracy.
Страница 75 - The President's power, if any, to issue the order must stem either from an act of Congress or from the Constitution itself. There is no statute that expressly authorizes the President to take possession of property as he did here. Nor is there any act of Congress to which our attention has been directed from which such a power can fairly be implied.
Страница 81 - With all its defects, delays and inconveniences, men have discovered no technique for long preserving free government except that the Executive be under the law, and that the law be made by parliamentary deliberations.
Страница 31 - When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty ; because apprehensions may arise, lest the same monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner.
Страница 54 - The accumulation of all powers legislative, executive, and judiciary in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.
Страница 75 - It is clear that if the President had authority to issue the order he did, it must be found in some provisions of the Constitution. And it is not claimed that express constitutional language grants this power to the President. The contention is that presidential power should be implied from the aggregate of his powers under the Constitution. Particular reliance is placed on provisions...
Страница 76 - The Founders of this Nation entrusted the lawmaking power to the Congress alone in both good and bad times.
Страница 29 - Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring) , That it is the sense of the Congress that the following Code of Ethics should be adhered to by all Government employees, including officeholders: CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICE Any person in Government service should : 1.
Страница 82 - Congress evidently considered that centralized administration of specially designed procedures was necessary to obtain uniform application of its substantive rules and to avoid these diversities and conflicts likely to result from a variety of local procedures and attitudes toward labor controversies.
Страница 56 - I declined to adopt the view that what was imperatively necessary for the Nation could not be done by the President unless he could find some specific authorization to do it. My belief was that it was not only his right but his duty to do anything that the needs of the Nation demanded unless such action was forbidden by the Constitution or by the laws.