 The President's power, if any, to issue the order must stem either from an act of Congress or from the Constitution itself. There is no statute that expressly authorizes the President to take possession of property as he did here. Nor is there any act...  Congressional Limitation of Executive Orders: Hearing Before the ... - Страница 75написао/ла United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law - 2000 - 87 страницаПуни преглед - О овој књизи
 | 1952 - 1288 страница
...therefore consider and determine that question now. YOUNGSTOWN CO. v. SAWYER. 5 n. The President's power, if any, to issue the order must stem either...an act of Congress or from the Constitution itself. There is no statute that expressly authorizes the President to take possession of property as he did... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1954 - 38 страница
...specific statute to justify the President's action. The Supreme Court pointed out in this connection that "There is no statute that expressly authorizes the...take possession of property as he did here," nor, it added, was there any "from which such a power can fairly be implied." Therefore, the Court stated,... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1954 - 50 страница
...specific statute to justify the President's action. The Supreme Court pointed out in this connection that "There is no statute that expressly authorizes the...take possession of property as he did here," nor, it added, was there any "from which such a power can fairly be implied." Therefore, the Court stated,... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1958 - 128 страница
...law?" Id. at 428. «« Youngstown Sheet Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 US 579 at 585 (1952): "The President'i power, if any, to issue the order must stem either...act of Congress or from the Constitution itself." 65 "In the framework of our Constitution, the President's power to see that the lawi are faithfully... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1959 - 100 страница
...of Congress." As said by the Court in the Steel Seizure oases (343 US 579, 585) : "The President's power, if any, to issue the order must stem either...an act of Congress or from the Constitution itself. There is no statute that expressly authorizes the President to take possession of property as he did... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1959 - 104 страница
...of Congress.' As said by the Court in the Steel Seizure cases (343 US 579, 585) : "The President's power, if any, to issue the order must stem either...an act of Congress or from the Constitution itself. There is no statute that expressly authorizes the President to take possession of property as he did... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency - 1964 - 954 страница
...that such an order was beyond the powers of tie President and stated as follows : "The President's power, if any. to issue the order must stem either...an act of Congress or from the Constitution itself. There is no statute that expressly authorizes the President to take ]x>ssession of property as he did... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency - 1964 - 954 страница
...either from *n act of Congress or from the Constitution itself. There is no statute that exln^Hsly authorizes the President to take possession of property as he did here. Yi-r i» there any act of Congress to which our attention has IMVII directed from «rbloh snch a power... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Labor and Public Welfare - 1967 - 1414 страница
...record presented. We shall therefore consider and determine that question now. II. The President's power, if any, to issue the order must stem, either from an act of Congress or from the Constitu- *• tion itself. There is no statute that expressly authorizes the President to take possession... | |
| |
