The burden of proof lies on the carrier, and nothing short of an express stipulation by parol or in writing should be permitted to discharge him from duties which the law has annexed to his employment. A Treatise on the Law of Bills of Lading - Страница 101написао/ла William Wagener Porter - 1891 - 516 страницаПуни преглед - О овој књизи
| Freeman Hunt, Thomas Prentice Kettell, William Buck Dana - 1849 - 710 страница
...the carrier, and nothing short of an express stipulation by parol, or in writing, should be permitted to discharge him from duties which the law has annexed to his employment. ******* " The respondents having succeeded in restricting their liability as carriers by the special... | |
| 1849 - 710 страница
...the carrier, and nothing short of an express stipulation by pnrol, or in writing, should be permitted to discharge him from duties which the law has annexed to his employment. " The special agreement, in this case, under which the goods were shipped, provided that they should... | |
| Joseph Kinnicut Angell - 1849 - 808 страница
...the carrier, and nothing short of an express stipulation by parol or in writing should be permitted to discharge him from duties which the law has annexed to his employment. The exemption from these duties should not depend upon implication or inference, founded on doubtful... | |
| Joseph Kinnicut Angell - 1851 - 836 страница
...the carrier, and nothing short of an express stipulation by parol or in writing should be permitted to discharge him from duties which the law has annexed to his employment. The exemption from these duties should not depend upon implication or inference, founded on doubtful... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 830 страница
...the carrier, and nothing short of an express stipulation by parol or in writing should be permitted to discharge him from duties which the law has annexed to his employment. The exemption from these duties should not depend upon implication or inference, founded on doubtful... | |
| Henry Flanders - 1853 - 584 страница
...the carrier, and nothing short of an express stipulation by parol or in writing should be permitted to discharge him from duties which the law has annexed to his employment. The exemption from these duties should not 1 Hollister v. Nowlen, 19 Wend. 234; NJ St. Nav. Co. v.... | |
| Isaac Edwards - 1855 - 708 страница
...the carrier, and nothing short of an express stipulation by parol, or in writing, should be permitted to discharge him from duties which the law has annexed to his employment. The exemption from these duties should not depend upon implication or inference, founded on doubtful... | |
| Oregon. Supreme Court, William Wallace Thayer, Joseph Gardner Wilson, Thomas Benton Odeneal, Julius Augustus Stratton, William Henry Holmes, Reuben S. Strahan, George Henry Burnett, Robert Graves Morrow, James W. Crawford, Frank A. Turner, Bellinger, Charles Byron - 1862 - 466 страница
...agreement, and that " nothing short of an express stipulation, by parol or in writing, should be permitted, to discharge him from duties which the law has annexed to his employment. The exemption from these duties should not depend upon implication or inference, founded on doubtful... | |
| William B. Wedgwood - 1866 - 494 страница
...burden of proof lies on the carrier, and nothing short of an express stipulation should be permitted to discharge him from duties which the law has annexed to his employment. The exemption from these duties should not depend upon implication or inference, founded on doubtful... | |
| |