Deyo v. N. Y. Central R. R. Co.
Piper v. N. Y. Cent. & Hudson River R. R. Co. (N. Y.)........657 Dale v. Delaware, L. &. W. R.R.
(N. Y.). Willis v. Long Island R. R. Co..
(N. Y.).... Edgerton v. New York & Harlem R. R. Co. (N. Y.). ......n617 Chapman v. New York & New
Haven R. R. Co. (N. Y.) .....n618 Colegrove v. New York & New
Haven R. R. Co. (N.Y.)...........n618 Webster v. Hudson River R.R.
Co. (N. Y.) Holbrook v. Utica & Schenectady R. R. Co. (N. Y.)................ Breen v. N. Y. Cent. & Hudson River R. R. Co. (N. Y.).... . . . n664 Walker v. Erie R'y Co. (N. Y.),n664 Morris v. N. Y. Cent. & Hudson River R.R. Co. (N. Y.).......n664 Alberti v. N. Y., L. E. & Western R'y Co. (N. Y.). .n664 Palmer v. President, etc. D. & H. Canal Co. (N. Y.)....... .n664 Lynch v. N. Y. Cent. & Hudson River R.R. Co. (N. Y.).......n665 Kelly v. N. Y. & Sea Beach R.R. Co. (N. Y.).
Train-KILLED ON.
....n618 Matteson v. N. Y. Central R. R
son River R.R. Co. (N. Y.)...n655 Hallahan v. N. Y., L. E. & Western R.R. Co. (N. Y.)
Brady v. Old Colony R. R. Co.
(Mass.) .....
State v. Grand Trunk R'y (N. H.).555
Hoffman v. N. Y. Cent. & Hudson
River R. R. Co. (N. Y.) ....1605 Parsons v. N. Y. Cent. & Hudson
River R. R. Co. (N. Y.)......n605 Train-STRUCK BY.
Esrey v. Southern Pac. Co. (Cal.). 98
Chicago & Alton R. R. Co. v. Wil-
son (Ill.)...
Chicago & Alton R. R. Co. v.
Rayburn (Ill.).
Trespasser Injured.
Northwestern R. R. Co. v. Hack
Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. Co. v.
Mahara (Ill.).
Chicago, St. P. & Kan. City R'y
Co. v. Ryan (Ill.).
Trespasser Killed.
Toledo, W. & W. R'y Co. v. Brooks
coach proprietor not liable for in-
juries from accident, where
driver was not negligent or in
fault.....
Eng. rule, 141
coach proprietor liable for acci-
dent arising from defective con-
struction of coach....Eng. rule, 141
where a passenger in trying to re-
cover his hat, which had blown
off, slipped under the railing of
the gangway of a boat, fell over-
board and was drowned, steam-
boat company not liable for the
accident ...
N. Y. 576
where passenger was pushed over-
board by crowding of other
passengers on steamboat to see
man who had fallen overboard,
steamboat company not liable
for the accident...... N. Y. 579
ACCIDENT POLICY.
payment of accident policy to
party injured does not relieve
railroad company from liability
for injury
ACTION Continued.
receivers of railroads may be sued
for like causes of action as the
railroad corporations....... Ga. 197
in action against several stage pro-
prietors plaintiff need not prove
that all defendants were joint
owners of stage line........ .Ill. 200
where action founded on breach of
duty, and declaration founded
on misfeasance of stage coach
proprietors, verdict and judg-
ment for plaintiff not errone-
Eng. rule, 206
against several stage coach pro-
prietors and verdict against two
of the same, not erroneous...
.Eng. rule, 206
where company was empowered
to make railway and charge pas-
sengers for conveyance, and
there was a provision that no
action for anything done or
omitted to be done, under the
act, could be brought without
twenty days' notice in writing,
and plaintiff brought action for
injury sustained while a passen-
ger, no notice was necessary,
as action was brought against
company as carriers, and not
for anything under the act....
..Eng. rule, 323
in statutory action for damages
for death of party, recovery is
to be of a pecuniary compensa-
tion for a pecuniary loss.. Kan. 355
statutory right of action to recov-
er damages for death of person
caused by wrongful act....
|