...shipments. [20] As the Supreme Court has observed in United States v. Philadelphia National Bank: * * * [a] merger which produces a firm controlling an undue...is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects. [374 US 321, at 363 (1963)] Quite clearly, concentration figures of the magnitude of those present...

...share of the relevant market and results in a significant increase in the concentration of flrms in the market, is so inherently likely to lessen competition...showing that the merger is not likely to have such iinti-competitive effects." M And later, quoting a comment in 08 Yale Law Journal 1627 at p. 1638 :...

...elaborate proof of market structure, market behavior, or probable anticompetitive effects. Specifically, we think that a merger which produces a firm controlling...is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects. See United States v. Koppers Co., 202 F. Supp. 437 (DCWD Pa. 1962). Such a test lightens the burden...

...elaborate proof of market structure, market behavior, or probable anticompetitive effects. Specifically, we think that a merger which produces a firm controlling...is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects. See United States v. Koppers Co., 202 F. Supp. 437 (DCWD Pa. 1962). Such a test lightens the burden...

...of firms in that market, is so inherently likely to lessen competition substantially that it must he enjoined in the absence of evidence clearly showing...not likely to have such anticompetitive effects." The Court went on to say : Such a test lightens the burden of proving illegality only with respect...

...elaborate proof of market structure, market behavior, or probable anticompetitive effects. Specifically, we think that a merger which produces a firm controlling...is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects. See United States v. Koppers Co., 202 F. Supp. 437 (DCWD Pa. 1962). Such a test lightens the burden...

...elaborate proof of market structure, market behavior, or probable anticompetitive effects. Specifically, we think that a merger which produces a firm controlling...is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects. See United States v. Koppers Co., 202-F. Supp. 437 (DCWD Pa. 1962). Such a test lightens the burden...

...problem of determining the tolerable degree of concentration under the antitrust laws, the Court states that: ... a merger which produces a firm controlling...is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects (page 363). Such a test of illegality under the Clayton Act, the Court contends, ". . . is fully consonant...

...concentration of firms in that market, is so inherently likely to lessen competition substantially tlint it must be enjoined in the absence of evidence clearly...not likely to have such anticompetitive effects." competition have already given them the lion's share of the unpatrolled and uncontrolled Baltimore...

...effects. Specifically, we think that a merger which produces a firm controlling an undue perceutage share of the relevant market, and results in a significant...is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects. 31 US L. Wk. at 46C2. Previously, the Court in its Brown Shoe decision had analyzed the entire problem...