United States Supreme Court Reports

1012 Hewitt v. Schultz, 180 U. S. 139, 45 L. ed. 463, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 309...

700

Hannibal & St. J. R. Co. v. Husen, 95 U. S. 465, 24 L. ed. 527.404, ▼. Missouri River Packet Co. 125 U. S. 260, 31 L. ed. 731, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 874...509, 1157 Hans v. Louisiana (1890) 134 U. S. 1, 33 L. ed. 842, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 504 .. .461, 467-471 Harden v. Gordon, 2 Mason, 541, Fed. Cas. No. 6,047... Harris v. Barber, 129 U. S. 366, 32 L. ed. 697, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 314....

.......

Hezekiah Baldwin, The, 8 Ben. 556, Fed. Cas. No. 6,449...

Higinbotham v. Stoddard, 72 N. Y. 94. Hill v. Boston, H. T. & W. R. Co. 144 Mass. 284, 10 N. E. 836....

896

79

671

745

958

v. Bowers, 120 Mass. 135.. v. Memphis, 134 U. S. 198, 33 L. ed. 887, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 562 ▼. Mendenhall, 21 Wall. 453, 22 L. ed. 616...

371

157

376

84

1119

302 Hine, The, v. Trevor, 4 Wall. 555, 18 L. ed. 451..... .76, 81,

Harrisburg, The, 119 U. S. 199, 30 L. ed. 358, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 140 1070 Hixon v. Burson, 54 Ohio St. 470, 43

679

Hastings & D. R. Co. v. Whitney, 132 U. S. 357, 33 L. ed. 363, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 112.... Haws v. Victoria Copper Min. Co. 160 U. S. 303, 40 L. ed. 436, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 282..951, Hayes v. Fischer, 102 U. S. 121, 26 L. ed. 95.........1003, 1004, 1074 v. Missouri, 120 U. S. 68, 30 L. ed. 578, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep.

350 .... Heald v. Rice, 104 U. S. 737, 26 L. ed. 910.. Heath, Re, 144 U. S. 92, 36 L. ed. 358, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 615...... Heath v. Ross, 12 Johns. 140. Hedrick v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. 167 U. S. 673, 42 L. ed. 320, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 922....

952

1153

444

324

1039

948

37 C. C. A. 513, 30 N. Y. Civ. Proc. Rep. 24, 96 Fed. 396..

...811, 812

275

Sloan, 107 N. Y. 244, 17 N. E. 335

....

United States, 186 U. S. 273, 46 L. ed. 1160, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 927

.831, 832

v. Stratton, 191 U. S. 115, 48 L. ed. 116, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 45.... .291, 987 Holder v. Aultman, M. & Co. 169 U. S. 81, 42 L. ed. 669, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 269 Holgate v. Eaton, 116 U. S. 33, 29 L. ed. 538, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 224 Holladay v. Patterson, 5 Or. 177.... Hollants v. Sullivan, 5 Land Dec. 115 Hollister v. Benedict & B. Mfg. Co. 113 U. S. 59, 28 L. ed. 901, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 717........ 1138

1153

480

276

678

Holloway v. Whiteley, 4 Wall. 522, 18

L. ed. 335..

Holmes v. Barclay, 4 La. Ann. 64....
Holt v. Indiana Mfg. Co. 176 U. S. 68,
44 L. ed. 374, 20 Sup. Ct.
Rep. 272

.301,
Holton v. Rutledge, 20 Land Dec. 227..
Home Ins. Co. v. Morse, 20 Wall. 445,
22 L. ed. 365.....

▼. Stanchfield, 1 Dill. 424, Fed.
Cas. No. 6,660.....

Hone v. Van Schaick, 7 Paige, 221...
Hooker v. Los Angeles, 188 U. S. 314,
47 L. ed. 487, 23 Sup. Ct.
Rep. 395

Hopkins v. United States, 171 U. S.
578, 43 L. ed. 290, 19 Sup.
Ct. Rep. 40..612, 697, 721, 722
730, 1154

Hopkins Case. See HOPKINS ▼. UNITED
STATES.
Hornbuckle v. Toombs, 18 Wall. 648,
21 L. ed. 966....

Horne v. George H. Hammond Co.

v. Worthen, 120 U. S. 97, 30 L.
ed. 588, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 469
Hurtado v. California, 110 U. S. 516,
28 L. ed. 232, 4 Sup. Ct.
Rep. 111

629

432

906

126

..886, 970

380 Hylton v. United States, 3 Dall. 171, 1
L. ed. 556

1030

674

155 U. S. 393, 39 L. ed. 197,
15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 167....
Smith, 159 U. S. 40, 40 L.
ed. 68, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 988
Horner v. United States, 143 U. S. 570,
36 L. ed. 266, 12 Sup. Ct.
Rep. 522
..289, 376, 1153
v. United States, 147 U. S. 449,
37 L. ed. 237, 13 Sup. Ct.
Rep. 409

Hoseason v. Keegen, 178 Mass. 247,

L

....

20, 18 L. ed. 125..........
v. Texas & P. R. Co. 100 U. S.
213, 25 L. ed. 612..100, 206
210, 1012, 1013
Houghton v. Payne, 194 U. S. 88, 48 L.

83

502

Industry, The, 1 Gall. 114, Fed. Cas.
No. 7,028
Interior Constr. Co. v. Gibney, 160 U.
S. 217, 40 L. ed. 401, 16
Sup. Ct. Rep. 272..
International Nav. Co. v. Farr & B.

709

1018

v. Bugbee, 24 How. 461, 16 L.
ed. 753

Stillwell & B. Mfg. Co. 139
U. S. 199, 35 L. ed. 147, 11
Sup. Ct. Rep. 500........

1052

Interstate Commerce Commission v.
Brimson, 154 U. S. 447, 38
L. ed. 1047, 4 Inters. Com.
Rep. 545, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep.
1125.
..707, 866-869
▼. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R.
Co. 167 U. S. 479, 42 L. ed.
243, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 896.. 868
Interstate Stock-Yards Co. v. Indian-
apolis U. R. Co. 99 Fed. 472 569
Iowa C. R. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389,
40 L. ed. 467, 16 Sup. Ct.

v. State, 11 Tex. 261..
James v. Campbell, 104 U. S. 356, 26

L. ed. 786...:...562, 1137, 1138
▼. Western N. C. R. Co. 121 N.
C. 523, 46 L. R. A. 306, 28
S. E. 537..
.631, 635, 637

Japanese Immigrant Case, 189 U. S.
86, 47 L. ed. 721, 23 Sup.
Ct. Rep. 611......920, 926, 984
Jaquith v. Alden, 189 U. S. 78, 47 L.
ed. 717, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep.
649..
Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co. 134
U. S. 178, 33 L. ed. 872, 10
Sup. Ct. Rep. 518..
Jefferson Branch Bank v. Skelly, 1
Black, 436, 17 L. ed. 173..

Jeffrey v. Moran, 101 U. S. 286, 25 L. ed. 786

283

1097

105

v. Meehan, 175 U. S. 1, 44 L. ed.
49, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1....
v. Montague, 194 U. S. 147, 48
L. ed. 913, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep.
611..
Joplin v. Southwest Missouri Light Co.
191 U. S. 150, 48 L. ed.
127, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 43..

.1050, 1051

224

..201
1081

839,

1133.

Jordan v. Lewis, 14 East. 306.
Journeycake Case. See CHEROKEE NA-
TION V. JOURNEYCAKE.

579

..384, 776

K.

671

J. E. Rumbell, The, 148 U. S. 1, 12, 37 L. ed. 345, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 498

Kanouse v. Martin, 15 How. 198, 14 L. ed. 660 Kaufmann v. Cooper, 46 Neb. 644, 65 N. W. 796 419 Kearney, Ex parte, 7 Wheat. 38, 5 L. ed. 391 .1003, 1004 638 Keegan Case. See CENTRAL P. R. Co. v. KEEGAN.

913

247

John Hancock Mut. L. Ins. Co. v. War

Johnson v. Boston Tow-Boat Co. 135

Mass. 209, 46 Am. Rep. 458 1010 Kelley v. Rhoads, 188 U. S. 1, 47 L.

1

Kentucky & I. Bridge Co. v. Louisville

& N. R. Co. 2 L. R. A.
289, 2 Inters. Com. Rep.
351, 37 Fed. 567...

Kentucky Railroad Tax Cases, 115 U.
S. 321, 29 L. ed. 414, 6 Sup.
Ct. Rep. 57..

Keokuk & W. R. Co. v. Missouri, 152
U. S. 301, 38 L. ed. 450, 14
Sup. Ct. Rep. 592..
Ker v. Illinois, 119 U. S. 436, 30 L.
ed. 421, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 225
Kidd v. Pearson, 128 U. S. 1, 32 L. ed.

741

709

472

109

877

346, 2 Inters. Com. Rep.
232, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 6. .508, 1154
Kiernan v. Multnomah County, 95 Fed.
849 ....

King v. Hodnett, 1 T. R. 96.

v. Morrall, 6 Price, 24..

v. Turner, 5 Maule & S. 206....
King Bridge Co. v. Otoe County, 120
U. S. 225, 30 L. ed. 623, 7
Sup. Ct. Rep. 552 ....119,
Kingman & Co. v. Western Mfg. Co.
170 U. S. 675, 42 L. ed.
1192, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 786 839
Kinney v. Central R. Co. 34 N. J. L

513, 3 Am. Rep. 265.....
Kirby v. United States, 174 U. S. 47,
43 L. ed. 890, 19 Sup. Ct.
Rep. 574

Kirwan v. Murphy, 170 U. S. 205, 42
L. ed. 1009, 18 Sup. Ct.
Rep. 592

v. Murphy, 28 C. C. A. 348, 49
U. S. App. 658, 83 Fed. 275
Knickerbocker L. Ins. Co. v. Pendle-

....

Lampases v. Bell, 180 U. S. 276, 45 L. ed. 527, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 368.

517

839

.127, 229, 970 Landes v. Brant, 10 How. 372, 13 L. ed. 459 Lane County v. Oregon, 7 Wall. 76, 19 L. ed. 104 ...

817

1039

705

ton, 112 U. S. 696, 28 L.
ed. 866, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 314 389 Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U.

Knott v. Evening Post Co. 124 Fed.

242...
Knowlton v. Moore, 178 U. S. 41, 44
L. ed. 969, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep.
747..
..484,
Knox v. Exchange Bank, 12 Wall.
379, 20 L. ed. 414....
Knox County v. Ninth Nat. Bank, 147
U. S. 91, 37 L. ed. 93, 13
Sup. Ct. Rep. 267........
Knoxville & O. R. Co. v. Harris, 99
Tenn. 684, 53 L. R. A. 921,
43 S. W. 115
Knoxville Water Co. v. Knoxville, 189

U. S. 434, 47 L. ed. 887,
23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 531..413, 1108
Kring v. Missouri, 107 U. S. 231, 27
L. ed. 509, 2 Sup. Ct. Rep.

443
Kurth v. State, 86 Tenn. 134, 5 S. W.
593

161

501

301

284

Lawton v. Steele, 152 U. S. 133, 38 L. ed. 385, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 499... Layton v. Missouri, 187 U. S. 356, 47 L. ed. 214, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 137 League v. Texas, 184 U. S. 156, 46 L. ed. 478, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 475 .... Leary v. Manuel, 12 Land Dec. 345.. Leather Mfrs. Nat. Bank v. Cooper, 120 U. S. 778, 30 L. ed. 816, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 777....120, 138 Leavenworth, L. & G. R. Co. v. United States, 92 U. S. 733, 23 L.