28 the fame with that on Harcourt, but is here more elegant and better connected. VIII. On Sir GODFREY KNELLEr. In Westminster-Abbey, 1723. Kneller, by heaven, and not a master taught, Living, great Nature fear'd he might outvie Of this epitaph the first couplet is good, the fecond not bad, the third is deformed with a broken metaphor, the word crowned not being applicable to the honours or the lays, and the fourth is not only borrowed from the epitaph on Raphael, but of very harsh conftruction. IX. On General HENRY WITHERS. Here, Withers, reft! thou braveft, gentleft mind, For thee the hardy veteran drops a tear, Withers, adieu! yet not with thee remove Amidft corruption, luxury, and rage, The epitaph on Withers affords another inftance 2 of common places, though fomewhat diverfified, by mingled qualities, and the peculiarity of a profeffion. The fecond couplet is abrupt, general, and unpleafing; exclamation feldom fucceeds in our language; and, I think, it may be obferved that the particle O! ufed at the beginning of a fentence, always offends. The third couplet is more happy; the value expreffed for him, by different forts of men, raises him to esteem; there is yet fomething of the common cant of fuperficial fatirifts, who fuppofe that the infincerity of a courtier deftroys all his fenfations, and that he is equally a diffembler to the living and the dead. At the third couplet I fhould wish the epitaph to close, but that I fhould be unwilling to lose the two next lines, which yet are dearly bought if they cannot be retained without the four that follow them. X. On Mr. ELIJAH FENTON. At Easthamftead in Berkshire, 1730. This modeft ftone, what few vain marbles can, A poet, bieft beyond the poet's fate, Whom Heaven kept facred from the Proud and Great: Foc 33 Foe to loud praife, and friend to learned cafe, Thank'd heaven that he had liv'd, and that he dy'd. The first couplet of this epitaph is borrowed from Crafhaw. The four next lines contain a fpecies of praise peculiar, original, and juft. Here, therefore, the infcription fhould have ended, the latter part containing nothing but what is common to every man who is wife and good. The character of Fenton was fo aimable, that I cannot forbear to wifh for fome poet or biographer to difplay it more fully for the advantage of pofterity. If he did not ftand in the first rank of genius, he may claim a place in the fecond; and, whatever criticism may object to his writings, cenfure could find very little to blame in his life, XI. On Mr. GAY. In Weflminfler-Abbey, 1732, Of manners gentle, of affections mild; With native humour tempering virtuous rage, Aş As Gay was the favourite of our author, this epitaph was probably written with an uncommon degree of attention; yet it is not more fuccefsfully executed than the reft, for it will not always happen that the fuccefs of a poet is proportionate to his labour. The same obfervation may be extended to all works of imagination, which are often influenced by caufes wholly out of the performer's power, by hints of which he perceives not the origin, by fudden elevations of mind which he cannot produce in himself, and which fometimes rife when he expects them least. The two parts of the first line are only echoes of each other; gentle manners and mild affections, if they mean any thing, muft mean the fame. That Gay was a man in wit is a very frigid commendation; to have the wit of a man is not much for a poet. The wit of man, and the fimplicity of a child, make a poor and vulgar contraft, and raise no ideas of excellence, either intellectual or moral. In the next couplet rage is lefs properly introduced after the mention of mildness and gentleness, which are made the constituents of his character; for a man fo mild and gentle to temper his rage, was not difficult. The next line is unharmonious in its found, and mean in its conception; the oppofition is obvious, and the word lafh used absolutely, and without any modification, is grofs and improper. To be above temptation in poverty and free from corruption among the Great, is indeed fuch a peculiarity as deferved notice. But to be a fafe companion is praise merely negative, arifing not from the poffeffion of virtue, but the abfence of vice, and that one of the most odious. As 40 As little can be added to his character, by afferting that he was lamented in his end. Every man that dies is, at least by the writer of his epitaph, fupposed to be lamented, and therefore this general lamentation does no honour to Gay. The first eight lines have no grammar; the adjectives are without any fubftantive, and the epithets without a fubject. The thought in the laft line, that Gay is buried in the bofoms of the worthy and the good, who are diftinguished only to lengthen the line, is fo dark that few understand it; and fo harsh, when it is explained, that ftill fewer approve. XII. Intended for Sir ISAAC NEWTON, ISAACUS NEWTONIUS: Hoc marmor fatetur. Nature, and Nature's laws, lay hid in night: Of this epitaph, fhort as it is, the faults feem not to be very few. Why part fhould be Latin and part English, it is not eafy to discover. In the Latin, the oppofition of Immortalis and Mortalis, is a mere found, or a mere quibble; he is not immortal in any fenfe contrary to that in which he is mortal. In the verses the thought is obvious, and the words night and light are too nearly allied. |