| William Skidmore - 1975 - 230 страница
...turn around quicklv enough to catch myself. I become a "me" in so far as 1 remember what I said. li is because of the "I" that we say that we are never...what we are. that we surprise ourselves by our own action.39 Since the "I" is the response of the organism to the attitudes of others, the " I " is always... | |
| Sandra B. Rosenthal, Patrick L. Bourgeois - 1991 - 246 страница
...representing the present, represents as well the emerging novelty of the present. "It is because of the I that we are never fully aware of what we are, that we surprise ourselves by our own actions." 122 The novel response of the 'I' is the emergent event, the conditions for which are provided... | |
| R. S. Perinbanayagam - 230 страница
...there at an earlier moment, while at the moment of its presence and occurrence it was not recognized. "It is in memory that the T is constantly present in experience" (1934:174). However, once it is recognized as having been present at an earlier moment and having now... | |
| Gerald Handel, Gail G. Whitchurch - 1985 - 710 страница
...Mead gave theoretical significance to this uncertainty of future action in his concept of the "I." "It is because of the 'I' that we say that we are...action. It is as we act that we are aware of ourselves. ... I want to call attention to the fact that this response of the T is something that is more or less... | |
| Gerald Handel, Gail G. Whitchurch - 1985 - 710 страница
...significance to this uncertainty of future action in his concept of the "I." "It is because of the 1' that we say that we are never fully aware of what...action. It is as we act that we are aware of ourselves. ... I want to call attention to the fact that this response of the T is something that is more or less... | |
| Gerald Handel, Gail G. Whitchurch - 1985 - 710 страница
...which they are considered. NOTES 1. Erik Erikson, Childhood and Society (New York: WW Norton, 1950). never fully aware of what we are, that we surprise...action. It is as we act that we are aware of ourselves. ... I want to call attention to the fact that this response of the T is something that is more or less... | |
| Harry T. Hunt - 1995 - 396 страница
...said. The "I" can be given, however, this functional relationship. It is because of the "I" that we can say that we are never fully aware of what we are, that we surprise ourselves by our own action. (Mead, 1936, pp. 173-74) ways that cannot be predicted from its present state. These resulting self-generated... | |
| Nick Crossley - 1996 - 204 страница
...speaking, feeling body-subject, which is not (yet) reflectively aware of either itself or its world: It is because of the I that we say that we are never...action. It is as we act that we are aware of ourselves. (Mead 1967: 174) The I, Mead continues, only knows itself in the past tense; that is, as 'me': As given,... | |
| Paula Nicolson - 1996 - 198 страница
...remember what I said. The T can be given. however. this functional relationship. It is because of the T that we say that we are never fully aware of what...are. that we surprise ourselves by our own action. (Mead. 1934: 174). In other words in order to be reflexive. we need to see our self as the 'object'... | |
| 198 страница
...cannot be absolutely predetermined by one's perceived identity. In Mead's words, "it is because of the T that we say that we are never fully aware of what we are, that we surprise ourselves by our own actions. It is as we act that we are aware of ourselves." 2 The future response of the I is always... | |
| |