In regard to the remarks offered upon the question of maps, they are made with a reservation of the right to deal with the subject fully in the British Counter-Case. It is obviously impossible at this stage to know what view will be presented by the United States, and the foregoing observations are made at this stage for the purpose of putting the Tribunal in possession at the outset of the general view taken by Great Britain upon the subject. APPENDIX TO THE CASE OF HIS MAJESTY'S GOVERNMENT BEFORE THE ALASKA BOUNDARY TRIBUNAL. VOL. III. TABLE OF CONTENTS. [References are to pages in original.] I. CONVENTION SIGNED AT WASHINGTON, JANUARY 24, 1903, FOR THE AD- II. RUSSIAN UKASE OF 1799 ... III. RUSSIAN UKASE OF SEPTEMBER 4, 1821.. Diplomatic Correspondence Relating to the Russian Ukase of September 4, 1821. Baron Nicolay to the Marquis of Londonderry..... Page. 1 5 7 The King's Advocate to the Marquis of Londonderry. Count Nesselrode to Count Lieven.. Messrs. S. Enderby & Son and Mr. W. Mellish to Board of Trade.... Nov. 27, 1821.... 20 Jan. 18, 1822... 20 The Duke of Wellington's Confidential Memorandum inclosed in Page. IV. CONVENTION BETWEEN GREAT BRITAIN AND RUSSIA.. Feb. 28 (16), 1825.... 73 Observations of Russian Plenipotentiaries on Sir C. Bagot's amended 71 Reply of Sir C. Bagot to observations of Russian Plenipotentiaries.. 72 Mar. 17 (29), 1824.. 74 Memorandum from Count Lieven on the North-West Coast Con- Mr. Addington to Mr. G. Canning Sir C. Bagot to Mr. G. Canning Apr. 24, 1824.... 79 Apr. 5 (17), 1824.... 79 May 26, 1824.... 80 May 29, 1824... 81 May 29, 1824.. 81 July 12, 1824.. July 13 (25), 1824.... 85 90 First draft Convention with Russia inclosed in Mr. Canning's let- |