Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (And How We the People Can Correct It)Oxford University Press, 28. 9. 2006. - 272 страница Levinson argues that too many of our Constitution's provisions promote either unjust or ineffective government. Under the existing blueprint, we can neither rid ourselves of incompetent presidents nor assure continuity of government following catastrophic attacks. Less important, perhaps, but certainly problematic, is the appointment of Supreme Court judges for life. Adding insult to injury, the United States Constitution is the most difficult to amend or update of any constitution currently existing in the world today. Democratic debate leaves few stones unturned, but we tend to take our basic constitutional structures for granted. Levinson boldly challenges the American people to undertake a long overdue public discussion on how they might best reform this most hallowed document and construct a constitution adequate to our democratic values. "Admirably gutsy and unfashionable." --Michael Kinsley, The New York Times "Bold, bracingly unromantic, and filled with illuminating insights. He accomplishes an unlikely feat, which is to make a really serious argument for a new constitutional convention, one that is founded squarely on democratic ideals." --Cass R. Sunstein, The New Republic "Everyone who cares about how our government works should read this thoughtful book." --Washington Lawyer |
Из књиге
Резултати 1-5 од 68
Страница i
... democracy in our republic. As Socratic in spirit as it is engaging in style, this is a marvelous guide to the pros and cons of democratic reform. Take up its invitation to look freshly at institutions you have taken for granted.” —James ...
... democracy in our republic. As Socratic in spirit as it is engaging in style, this is a marvelous guide to the pros and cons of democratic reform. Take up its invitation to look freshly at institutions you have taken for granted.” —James ...
Страница 6
... democracy. I put it this way to acknowledge that “democracy” is most certainly what political theorists call an ... democratic constitutionalism, applying our own twentyfirst-century norms, that vindicates the Constitution under ...
... democracy. I put it this way to acknowledge that “democracy” is most certainly what political theorists call an ... democratic constitutionalism, applying our own twentyfirst-century norms, that vindicates the Constitution under ...
Страница 8
... Democratic counterparts (34 percent).9 Compared to the president and Congress, members of the Supreme Court might feel considerably better. Yet even there, the data are mixed. For example, a May 2005 poll conducted by Quinnipiac ...
... Democratic counterparts (34 percent).9 Compared to the president and Congress, members of the Supreme Court might feel considerably better. Yet even there, the data are mixed. For example, a May 2005 poll conducted by Quinnipiac ...
Страница 9
... democratic, in a country that professes to believe in democracy, and significantly dysfunctional, in terms of the quality of government that we receive, then it follows that we should no longer express our blind devotion to it. It is ...
... democratic, in a country that professes to believe in democracy, and significantly dysfunctional, in terms of the quality of government that we receive, then it follows that we should no longer express our blind devotion to it. It is ...
Садржај
3 | |
11 | |
25 | |
TooPowerful Presidents Chosen in an Indefensible Process Who Cannot Be Displaced Even When They Are Manifestly Incompetent | 79 |
An Idea Whose Time Has Passed | 123 |
5 The Constitution as Creator of SecondClass Citizens | 141 |
6 The Impermeable Article V | 159 |
What Is to Be Done? | 167 |
The Wisdom of Woodrow Wilson | 181 |
The Constitution of the United States | 183 |
AFTERWORD FOR THE PAPERBACK EDITION | 201 |
NOTES | 217 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS | 239 |
INDEX | 243 |
Друга издања - Прикажи све
Чести термини и фразе
Akhil Reed Amar Al Gore American politics appointed argue arguments Article ballot basic believe bicameralism Bill Bill Clinton Bruce Ackerman Bush Bush’s campaign candidates citizens clause Clinton congressional consider Consti decision defend democracy democratic dent effect elec election Electoral College electoral votes equal example executive federal Federalist framers George George H. W. Bush House of Representatives impeachment important inasmuch institutions issues Jack Balkin James Madison Jefferson John judges judiciary leaders least legislation legislatures majoritarian majority ment Nixon number of votes obviously one’s percent perhaps person political system popular vote population Preamble present presidential power problem proposed ratified reason referendum regard Republican requires Richard Nixon rule Sanford Levinson serve Seventeenth Amendment simply small-state senators stitution suggested Sundquist supra note surely tenure term tion tution two-thirds U.S. Constitution United University Press veto power Vice President voters White House whole number Yale