Слике страница
PDF
ePub

Subtitle D-Physician Payments Sunshine Provision

Section 1451. Reports on financial relationships between manufacturers and distributors of covered drugs, devices, biologics, or medical supplies under Medicare, Medicaid, or CHIP and physicians and other health care entities and between physicians and other health care entities

Current Law

Under section 1128B(b) of the Social Security Act, referred to as the federal anti-kickback statute, it is a felony for a person to knowingly and willfully offer, pay, solicit, or receive anything of value (i.e., "remuneration") in return for a referral or to induce generation of business reimbursable under a federal health care program. The statute prohibits the offer or payment of remuneration for patient referrals, as well as the offer or payment of anything of value in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering, or arranging for, or recommending the purchase, lease, or ordering of any item or service that is reimbursable by a federal health care program. Persons found guilty of violating the anti-kickback statute may be subject to a fine of up to $25,000, imprisonment of up to five years, and exclusion from participation in federal health care programs for up to one year. However, a number of statutory and regulatory "safe harbors" to the anti-kickback statute protect various business arrangements from prosecution. Safe harbors include certain types of investment interests, personal services and management contracts, referral services, space rental or equipment rental arrangements, warranties, discounts, and employment arrangements. In 2003, OIG issued "Compliance Program Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers" (68 Federal Register 23731), which stated that pharmaceutical companies and their employees and agents often engage in a number of arrangements that offer benefits to physicians or others in a position to make or influence prohibited referrals under the anti-kickback statute. Examples of remunerative arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers and parties in a position to influence referrals that were cited by OIG included entertainment, recreation, travel, meals, or other benefits in association with information or marketing presentations, as well as gifts, gratuities, and other business courtesies. OIG indicated these arrangements potentially implicate the antikickback statute if any one purpose of the arrangement is to generate business for the pharmaceutical company.

Under section 1877 of the Social Security Act, the federal prohibition on physician self-referrals, if a physician (or an immediate family member of a physician) has a "financial relationship" with an entity, the physician may not make a referral to the entity for the furnishing of designated health services (DHS) for which payment may be made under Medicare or Medicaid, and the entity may not present (or cause to be presented) a claim to the federal health care program or bill to any individual or entity for DHS furnished pursuant to a prohibited referral. "Financial relationship" is defined as either an ownership or investment interest or a compensation arrangement. An ownership or investment interest may be equity, debt, or other means; however, section 1877(c) specifies that an ownership interest does not include certain investment se

curities which may be purchased on terms generally available to the public and meet additional requirements, or that are shares of certain regulated investment companies. A compensation arrangement means an arrangement involving remuneration between a physician or an immediate family member of such physician and an entity. Section 1877(f) requires an entity that provides covered services for which payment may be made under Medicare to report to the Secretary information on the entity's ownership, investment, and compensation arrangements, including the covered items and services provided by the entity, and the names and unique physician identification numbers of all physicians who have an ownership or investment interest in, or a compensation arrangement with the entity, or whose immediate relatives have such an ownership or investment interest or compensation relationship with the entity.

Multiple states and the District of Columbia have enacted legislation requiring pharmaceutical and other companies to disclose gifts and payments made to physicians and other entities. These state laws generally require annual disclosures to the states of such gifts and payments. Certain categories of gifts and payments are exempted from reporting requirements under most of the state laws. For example, state laws may exempt product samples intended for free distribution to patients and gifts worth less than a certain amount. While companies may make a voluntary disclosure of these gifts and other payments, there are currently no similar federal reporting requirements.

Proposed Law

The bill would add a new Section 1128H of the Social Security Act to create certain reporting requirements applicable to manufacturers or distributors of a drug, device, biological, or medical supply for which payment may be made available under Medicare, Medicaid, or the State Children's Health Insurance Program, as well as hospitals or other entities that bill Medicare.

Under the section, beginning in 2011, a manufacturer or distributor that provides a payment or other transfer of value to a covered recipient (e.g., a physician, a pharmacist, a hospital, a medical school, or a group purchasing organization) or a recipient's designee would be required to annually submit specified information to the Secretary regarding the recipients, any payments or other transfers of value, and information about a provided drug sample. Payments or transfers of value include, among other things, gifts, food, or entertainment, travel or trips, honoraria, research funding or grants, education or conference funding and consulting fees, profit distribution, stock or stock option grant, or any ownership or investment interest held by a physician in a manufacturer (subject to exclusion), but do not include payments or transfers of five dollars or less, a loan of a covered device for a shortterm trial period for evaluation purposes, items or services provided under a contractual warranty where the terms are specified in a purchase or lease agreement, items given to a patient who is not acting in a professional capacity, in-kind items for the provision of charity care, a dividend or other profit distribution from or ownership or investment interest in a publicly traded security and mutual fund, compensation paid by a manufacturer or distributor to

an employee who works solely for a manufacturer or distributor, and any discount or cash rebate. The information submitted must include the aggregate amount of all payments or transfers of value from manufacturers to covered recipients, regardless of whether such payments or transfers were individually disclosed. If a manufacturer or distributor provides a payment to another entity or individual at the request of or designated on behalf of a covered recipient, the manufacturer or distributor must disclose the payment or transfer under the name of the covered recipient.

Section 1128H would allow manufacturers and distributors to delay submission of their reports to the Secretary of payments and transfers of value made to covered recipients pursuant to certain services furnished as part of a product development agreement, or in connection with a clinical investigation of a new drug, device, biological, or medical supply. The information subject to delayed reporting would be considered confidential and would not be subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act or other similar federal, state, or local law until or after the date on which the information is made available to the public.

Manufacturers and distributors that fail to submit the required information in a timely manner in accordance with regulations would be subject to a civil monetary penalty of at least $1,000 but not more than $10,000 for each payment or transfer of value not reported, up to a maximum of $150,000 for each annual submission of information. Any manufacturer or distributor that knowingly fails to submit information would be subject to a civil monetary penalty of at least $10,000 but not more than $100,000 for each payment or transfer of value, and may not exceed $1 million or, if greater, 0.1% of the total annual revenue of the manufacturer or distributor.

Each hospital or other health care entity, excluding a Medicare Advantage organization, that bills the Secretary under Medicare Part A or Part B would have to report on the ownership shares (other than shares generally available to the public or shares of certain regulated investment companies as described in Section 1877(c) of the Social Security Act) of each physician and the physician's immediate family members. Hospitals and other entities that fail to submit the required information in a timely manner in accordance with regulations would be subject to a civil monetary penalty of at least $1,000 but not more than $10,000 for each ownership or investment interest not reported. Any hospital or other entity that knowingly fails to submit information would be subject to a civil monetary penalty of at least $10,000 but not more than $100,000 for each ownership or investment interest not reported. The total amount of civil monetary penalties imposed with respect to each annual submission of information may not exceed $1 million or, if greater, 0.1% of the total annual revenue of the entity. All funds collected by the Secretary under section 1128H from the imposition of civil monetary penalties would be used to carry out the requirements of the section.

The section would require the Secretary to establish procedures no later than September 30, 2011, and on June 30 each year after to ensure public availability of the submitted information through an Internet website that is searchable, has a clear and understandable format, and that meets various other requirements. Manufac

turer and distributors, hospitals, and other entities that would be subject to reporting requirements under 1128H would be responsible for the accuracy of the information that is submitted to the Secretary and made available on the website. The Secretary would be required to establish procedures to ensure that a covered recipient has an opportunity to submit corrections to these entities the manufacturer with regard to information made public with respect to the covered recipient. Under such procedures, the corrections must be transmitted to the Secretary. Information relating to drug samples and national provider identification numbers would not be made available to the public by the Secretary, but may be made available outside of the Department of Health and Human Services for research or legitimate business purposes pursuant to data use agreements.

Under the section, if a state attorney general has provided notice to the Secretary of the intent to proceed on a specific case and the Secretary has had an opportunity to bring an action and has declined to do so, the attorney general of a state would be permitted to bring an action against a manufacturer or distributor in the state for a violation of the section.

Section 1128H would require the Secretary to submit a report to Congress no later than April 1 of each year, beginning in 2011, that includes information submitted in the preceding year by manufacturers and distributors and a description of any enforcement actions taken to carry out the section (including penalties imposed during the preceding year). The Secretary would also be required to submit to Congress a report on the results of the Disclosure of Physician Financial Relationships surveys required pursuant to section 5006 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. This report would be submitted to Congress not later than 6 months after the date such surveys are collected and would be made publicly available on an Internet website of the Department of Health and Human Services. In addition, no later than April 1 of each year, beginning in 2011, the Secretary would be required to submit to states a report that includes information submitted by manufacturers and distributors in the preceding year, as well as other information.

Additionally, beginning on January 1, 2011, Section 1128H would preempt any law or regulation of a state or its political subdivision that requires a manufacturer or distributor to disclose or report information regarding a payment or other transfer of value to a covered recipient, in accordance with the section. However, the section would not preempt state laws or regulations under which (A) the disclosure or reporting of information is not of the type required to be disclosed or reported under Section 1128H, (B) the information reported is required to be disclosed or reported to a federal, state, or local governmental agency for public health surveillance, investigation, or other public health purposes or health oversight purposes, or (C) the state requires the discovery or admissibility of the information in a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding.

Subtitle E-Public Reporting on Health Care-Associated Infections Section 1461. Requirement for public reporting by hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers on health care-associated infections

Current Law

Current law does not, in general, require the reporting of health care-associated infections (HAIs), although such reporting is required in a number of states. Several provisions in current federal law have established programs that are somewhat related.

First, Section 5001(c) of the Deficit Reduction Act (P.L. 109-171) requires the Secretary, by regulation, to identify certain preventable conditions that are not present on admission, and that therefore are acquired in the health care facility. Medicare Part A reimbursement is not provided for the care of these secondary conditions. This provision is implemented in CMS's annual Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) rule for hospitals. At this time, listed conditions include some that are unrelated to infection (such as incompatible blood transfusions, and trauma resulting from falls in the facility), as well as specific types of catheter-associated and surgical site infections. The rules explain that some other infections (such as infection with methicillin-resistant Staph. aureus, or MRSA) are not included because, among other things, it can be hard to determine, in an individual patient, whether an infection is associated with health care or was acquired previously.

Also, two voluntary CMS reporting programs established under current law may capture information related to HAIS. The Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI), established under Section 101(b) of the Tax Relief and Healthcare Act of 2006 (P.L. 109-432), provides incentive payments to physicians who report certain quality measures, which include instances of catheter-associated or surgical site infection. Information from this program is not publicly reported. The Reporting Hospital Quality Data for Annual Payment Update (RHQDAPU) Program, originally established under section 501(b) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA, P.L. 108-173), requires participating hospitals to report quality data to CMS in order to receive a full annual payment update. Selected measures are publicly reported on the CMS Hospital Compare website. However, regarding infections, this program uses process measures (e.g., antibiotics were used properly in surgical patients) rather than outcome measures (e.g., a patient developed a surgical site infection).

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, which was incorporated into the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-5), created a new Title XXX in the PHS Act to promote the widespread adoption of health information technology (HIT). Among its provisions, the HITECH Act established a process for the development of interoperability standards that support the nationwide electronic exchange of health information among doctors, hospitals, patients, health plans, the federal government, and other health care stakeholders.

« ПретходнаНастави »