United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Том 234United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1914 |
Из књиге
Резултати 1-5 од 74
Страница 15
... limit was entitled to an allowance under § 15 , but to no division out of the through rate . A common carrier tap line was entitled to a division or allowance out of the through rate on a haul of either more or less than 3 miles . The ...
... limit was entitled to an allowance under § 15 , but to no division out of the through rate . A common carrier tap line was entitled to a division or allowance out of the through rate on a haul of either more or less than 3 miles . The ...
Страница 28
... limits . It follows that independent owners would get this blanket rate for the entire haul of their products while proprietary owners would pay the same rate plus the cost of getting to the trunk line over the tap line . The Commission ...
... limits . It follows that independent owners would get this blanket rate for the entire haul of their products while proprietary owners would pay the same rate plus the cost of getting to the trunk line over the tap line . The Commission ...
Страница 39
... to be deposited within the limits of the area described in paragraph 36. The method of deposit will be subject to approval by the Engineer officer in charge . Opinion of the Court . 234 U. S. " 31. UNITED STATES v . AXMAN . 39.
... to be deposited within the limits of the area described in paragraph 36. The method of deposit will be subject to approval by the Engineer officer in charge . Opinion of the Court . 234 U. S. " 31. UNITED STATES v . AXMAN . 39.
Страница 59
... limit of jurisdiction , was not of admiralty cognizance . The reason was , that it was not committed within the locality that gave the jurisdic- tion . The vessel itself was unimportant . The jurisdiction of the admiralty does not ...
... limit of jurisdiction , was not of admiralty cognizance . The reason was , that it was not committed within the locality that gave the jurisdic- tion . The vessel itself was unimportant . The jurisdiction of the admiralty does not ...
Страница 91
... limits of their respective jurisdic- tions are treated equally . Section 2 of Act No. 612 is not in conflict with that paragraph of § 5 of the act of July 1 , 1902 , which provides that no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause ...
... limits of their respective jurisdic- tions are treated equally . Section 2 of Act No. 612 is not in conflict with that paragraph of § 5 of the act of July 1 , 1902 , which provides that no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause ...
Садржај
xxvii | |
xxix | |
xxxi | |
xxxviii | |
xl | |
xliv | |
xlv | |
xlvi | |
540 | |
542 | |
545 | |
548 | |
576 | |
578 | |
585 | |
592 | |
1 | |
3 | |
17 | |
18 | |
23 | |
35 | |
48 | |
49 | |
52 | |
62 | |
64 | |
70 | |
81 | |
86 | |
91 | |
100 | |
103 | |
117 | |
123 | |
129 | |
131 | |
141 | |
149 | |
152 | |
167 | |
194 | |
199 | |
203 | |
218 | |
224 | |
245 | |
254 | |
280 | |
282 | |
285 | |
293 | |
294 | |
301 | |
315 | |
317 | |
320 | |
321 | |
333 | |
345 | |
360 | |
380 | |
384 | |
385 | |
400 | |
412 | |
422 | |
446 | |
459 | |
495 | |
511 | |
525 | |
597 | |
600 | |
602 | |
604 | |
613 | |
615 | |
621 | |
631 | |
634 | |
639 | |
640 | |
652 | |
669 | |
671 | |
679 | |
694 | |
711 | |
712 | |
720 | |
725 | |
727 | |
736 | |
748 | |
749 | |
750 | |
751 | |
753 | |
754 | |
755 | |
757 | |
758 | |
759 | |
760 | |
761 | |
762 | |
763 | |
765 | |
766 | |
767 | |
768 | |
772 | |
773 | |
778 | |
779 | |
781 | |
784 | |
792 | |
801 | |
819 | |
825 | |
831 | |
834 | |
843 | |
847 | |
848 | |
Друга издања - Прикажи све
Чести термини и фразе
234 U. S. Opinion act of Congress action affirmed alleged appellee applied Attorney authority bankruptcy cars charge Circuit Court claim claimant clause Commerce Court common carrier Constitution construction contract corporation County Court of Appeals damages decision decree defendant in error delivered the opinion denied dismiss District Court East Coast Line effect fact Federal question ferry filed Florida Fourteenth Amendment freight Government grant held Hilsman Illinois Indians Interstate Commerce Commission issued judgment June June 22 jurisdiction JUSTICE Kansas Kentucky Lake Lake Washington lands liability lien lumber ment mineral Minnesota Missouri Pacific pany parties patent persons petition petitioner plaintiff in error Railroad Company Railway Company rates S. W. Rep Salmon Bay Southern Pacific Railroad Stat statute suit supra Supreme Court tap line territory Texas tion traffic transportation treaty United Virginia writ of certiorari writ of error
Популарни одломци
Страница 709 - January, eighteen hundred and ninety-eight, it shall be unlawful for any such common carrier to haul or permit to be hauled or used on its line any car used in moving interstate traffic not equipped with couplers coupling automatically by impact, and which can be uncoupled without the necessity of men going between the ends of the cars.
Страница 547 - When, therefore, one devotes his property to a use in which the public has an interest, he in effect grants to the public an interest in that use, and must submit to be controlled by the public for the common good to the extent of the interest he has thus created. He may withdraw his grant by discontinuing the use, but so long as he maintains the use, he must submit to the control.
Страница 402 - ... no contract, receipt, rule or regulation shall exempt such common carrier, railroad or transportation company from the liability hereby imposed : Provided, that nothing in this section shall deprive any holder of such receipt or bill of lading of any remedy or right of action which he has under existing law.
Страница 54 - The title of a person who negotiates an instrument is defective within the meaning of this act when he obtained the instrument, or any signature thereto, by fraud, duress, or force and fear, or other unlawful means, or for an illegal consideration, or when he negotiates it in breach of faith, or under such circumstances as amount to a fraud.
Страница 538 - That the provisions of this Act shall apply to any corporation or any person or persons engaged in the transportation of oil or other commodity, except water and except natural or artificial gas, by means of pipe lines, or partly by pipe lines and partly by railroad, or partly by pipe lines and partly by water, who shall be considered and held to be common carriers within the meaning and purpose of this Act...
Страница 342 - Provided, however, That the provisions of this act shall not apply to the transportation of passengers or property, or to the receiving, delivering, storage, or handling of property, wholly within one State, and not shipped to or from a foreign country from or to any State or Territory as aforesaid.
Страница 342 - That it shall be unlawful for any common carrier subject to the provisions of this act to make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person, company, firm, corporation, or locality, or any particular description of traffic, in any respect whatsoever...
Страница 58 - The jurisdiction of the courts of the United States under this Act shall be concurrent with that of the courts of the several States, and no case arising under this Act and brought in any state court of competent jurisdiction shall be removed to any court of the United States.
Страница 463 - Whenever a carrier by railroad shall in competition with a water route or routes reduce the rates on the carriage of any species of freight to or from competitive points, it shall not be permitted to increase such rates unless after hearing by the Interstate Commerce Commission it shall be found that such proposed increase rests upon changed conditions other than the elimination of water competition.
Страница 698 - USCA § 379), it is provided that "the writ of injunction shall not be granted by any court of the United States to stay proceedings in any court of a state, except in cases where such injunction may be authorized by any law relating to proceedings in bankruptcy.