 ... a presumption of negligence on the part of the company usually arises from proof of such facts, in the absence of anything to the contrary, and the burden is then cast upon the company to show that its negligence did not cause the injury.  Reports of Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana - Страница 221написао/ла Indiana. Supreme Court, Charles Frederick Remy, George Washington Self, Philip Zoercher, William H. Adams, Mrs. Edward Franklin White, Emma Mary May - 1908Пуни преглед - О овој књизи
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1901 - 864 страница
...has entire control, without contributory negligence on the part of the passenger, a presumption of negligence on the part of the company usually arises...show that its negligence did not cause the injury." Under this rule, we are of the opinion that the case was one for the jury. It would be so unusual that... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1909 - 588 страница
...something connected with the equipment or operation of the road, over which the company has entire control, a presumption of negligence on the part of...show that its negligence did not cause the injury." A large number of cases are cited which, it is claimed, support the text as quoted above. Under the... | |
 | 1908 - 1164 страница
...something connected with the equipment or operation of the road, over which the company has entire control, a presumption of negligence on the part of...show that its negligence did not cause the Injury." A large number of cases are cited which, It la claimed, support the text as quoted above. Under the... | |
 | 1913 - 1236 страница
...has entire control, without contributory negligence on the part of the passenger, a presumption of negligence on the part of the company usually arises...absence of anything to the contrary, and the burden of going forward and producing evidence in order to escape liability Is then cast upon the company... | |
 | 1920 - 1144 страница
...something connected with the equipment or operation of the road, over which the company hes entire control, a presumption of negligence on the part of...show that its negligence did not cause the injury." We quoted and approved this statement of the law In the ease of Biddle et al., Recvrs., v. Rlley, 118... | |
 | 1909 - 1362 страница
...part of the passenger, a presumption of negligence on the part of the company usually arises from the proof of such facts in the absence of anything to the contrary, and the burden of going forward and producing evidence In order to escape liability Is then cast upon the company... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1906 - 664 страница
...something connected with the equipment or operation of the road, over which the company has entire control, a presumption of negligence on the part of...show that its negligence did not cause the injury." Authority for the various propositions of law announced above will be found in 4 Elliott, Railroads,... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1920 - 676 страница
...by something connected with the equipment or operation of the road over which the company has entire control, a presumption of negligence on the part of...show that its negligence did not cause the injury." We quoted and approved this statement of the law in the case of Biddle et al., Recvrs., v. Riley, 118... | |
 | John Milton Gardner, Walter James Eagle - 1900 - 848 страница
...part of the passenger, a presumption of negligence on the part of the company usually arises from the proof of such facts, in the absence of anything to...show that its negligence did not cause the injury." Under this rule, we are of the opinion that the case was one for the jury. It would be so unusual that... | |
 | 1900 - 1348 страница
...passenger, a presumption of nejrli gence on the part of the company usually arises from the pi;oof of such facts, In the absence of anything to the contrary,...show that Its negligence did not cause the Injury." Under this rule, we are of the opinion that the case was one for the Jury. It would be so unusual tbat... | |
| |
