Panama Canal Treaties: MarkupU.S. Government Printing Office, 1978 |
Друга издања - Прикажи све
Чести термини и фразе
action adopt agree agreement amendment American approval believe Canal Zone CHAIRMAN CLERK committee concern CONGRESS THE LIBRARY consent Constitution defense discussion DOCKERY feel foreign GLENNON going Hay-Pauncefote Treaty hear human rights incorporated interests interpretation JANUARY 26 JONES judgment language legislation LIBRARY OF CONGRESS markup matter ment military million nations negotiate Neutrality Treaty obligation October 14 OMAR TORRIJOS operation Panama Canal Treaty parties percent Permanent Neutrality plebiscite President Carter problem procedure proposed provision question recommendations record regime of neutrality relations Republic of Panama require resolution of ratification respect response revenue sea level canal Senator Baker Senator BIDEN Senator BYRD Senator CHURCH Senator GLENN Senator GRIFFIN Senator JAVITS Senator McGOVERN Senator PERCY Senator SARBANES Senator STONE ships sovereignty statement of understanding territory Thank thing threat tion toll increase Torrijos traffic treaty power U.S. citizens U.S. Senate United vote Zonians
Популарни одломци
Страница 127 - The treaty power, as expressed in the Constitution, is in terms unlimited except by those restraints which are found in that instrument against the action of the government or of its departments, and those arising from the nature of the government itself and of that of the States.
Страница 126 - That the treaty power of the United States extends to all proper subjects of negotiation between our government and the governments of other nations, is clear.
Страница 116 - The Canal shall be free and open to the vessels of commerce and of war of all nations observing these Rules, on terms of entire equality, so that there shall be no discrimination against any such nation, or its citizens or subjects, in respect of the conditions or charges of traffic, or otherwise Such conditions and charges of traffic shall be just and equitable.
Страница 54 - The correct interpretation of this principle is that each of the two countries shall, in accordance with their respective constitutional processes, defend the canal against any threat to the regime of neutrality, and consequently shall have the right to act against any aggression or threat directed against the canal or against the peaceful transit of vessels through the canal.
Страница 115 - Maps of the Land and Water Areas for the Operation and Defense of the Panama Canal, Referred to in the Agreements in Implementation of Articles III and IV of the Panama Canal Treaty [The maps are not printed here.
Страница 127 - It would not be contended that it extends so far as to authorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the government or in that of one of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter, without its consent.
Страница 131 - He was unequivocally of opinion, that the treatymaking power did extend to cases of cession of territory, though he would not undertake to say that it could extend to all cases ; yet he did not doubt it must be construed to extend to some.
Страница 128 - KING moved to strike out the exception of treaties of peace, from the general clause requiring two thirds of the Senate for making treaties. Mr. WILSON wished the requisition of two thirds to be struck out altogether. If the majority cannot be trusted, it was a proof, as observed by Mr.
Страница 126 - Constitution has relation then, not to the treaty-power, but to the powers of the State. In our relation to the rest of the world the case is reversed. Here the States disappear. Divided within, we present the exterior of undivided sovereignty. The wisdom of the Constitution appears conspicuous. When enumeration was needed, there we find the powers enumerated and exactly defined ; when not, we do not find what would 'be vain and pernicious.
Страница 126 - ... regulated by it ; and it is competent to regulate all such subjects ; provided, and here are its true limits, such regulations are not inconsistent with the Constitution. If so they are void. No treaty can alter the fabric of our Government, nor can it do that which the Constitution has expressly...