« ПретходнаНастави »
Seaman, Dooley v., two cases (Sup.).
Second Nat. Bank, Bankers' Service Corp.
Seelenfreund v. Seelenfreund (Sup.). Seiden v. Belt Line R. Corp. (Sup.). Seiden, Hyman v. (Sup.).
Gascone & Co. v. (Sup.).
Salvin, Pauwels v. (Sup.).
Seidler, Ramapo Mountains Water Power & Service Co. v. (Sup.).
Sampson v. Sampson (Sup.).
Samuel Quint Co. v. Goodman (Sup.) Sanders v. Krumholz (Sup.).. Sanders, Stokes v. (Sup.)...
Selden Motor Vehicle Co., Conlon v. (Sup.) 1105 Selwyn-Brown v. Superno Co. (Sup.).... 918 Seventy-Ninth St. Garage Corp., Karg v. .1128 (Sup.)
Sandler v. Schachter, two cases (Sup.)...1128
Sexauer & Lemke v. Luke A. Burke & Sons
Sexton v. Public Service Commission of
Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. Roberts (Sup.)
Saratoga Ave. in City of New York, In re (Sup.)
Shaer, Morgenstern v. (Sup.).
Shapiro v. Mollat (Sup.).
Saratoga Ave. in City of New York, In re (Sup.)
Sharlow v. Sharlow Bros. Co. (Sup.) Sharlow Bros. Co., Sharlow v. (Sup.). Shear, Montgomery v. (Sup.).
Saulpaugh's Estate, In re (Sup.).
Savinsky v. Isaac Hicks & Sons (Sup.)...1128 Scannell, Collins v. (Sup.)..
Shields v. Brooklyn Heights R. Co. (Sup.) 1130
Shoninger, Studin v. (Sup.).
Sheffield Farms Co., Wagner v. (Sup.). Shenk, People v. (Sup.).
Sherman, Kessler v. (Sup.).
Siegel, Rubin v. (Sup.).
Schenectady Avenue, In re, three
Siemund v. Schmidt (Mun. Ct. N. Y.). Sigourney, Wheeler v. (Sup.)..
S. Cheney & Son, Lamb v. (Sup.). Schepp Co. v. Far Eastern Mfg.
Silberman Dairy Co., People v. (Sup.).
Simons v. Terbune (Sup.).
Schirmer v. Kline (Sup.).
Sisson, Hickey v. (Sup.).
Sisson, Murphy v. (Sup.).
Schlessel v. Greenberg (Sup.).
Sisson, People ex rel. Cahill v. (Sup.).
Schioeder, In re (Sup.).
Sisson, People ex rel. Katz v. (Sup.).
Schmidt v. Schmidt (Sup.).
Sisson, People ex rel. Nally v. (Sup.).
Schmidt, Siemund v. (Mun. Ct. N. Y.).
Sisson v. Seaman (Sup.).
Schmit, In re (Sup.).
Sisson, Snyder v. (Sup.).
Schmutz v. Firm Realty Co. (Sup.).
Schneider, Coneen v. (Sup.)..
Schneider v. Ogden (Sup.)
Skidmore, People ex rel. Commissioner of Public Charities of City of New York v. (Sup.)
Schrager v. Foster (Sup.).
Schreck, Ackner v. (Sup.)..
Schroeder, Mitchell v. (Sup.).
240 Slotchin. Rosenberg v. (Sup.).
Sluyter Co. v. Koplik (Mun. Ct. N. Y.)....1016 49 Smith v. Alabama Lumber & Cooperage
Schultz v. Glickstein (Sup.).
Schultz v. Mets Bros. (Sup.).
.1129 Smith v. Cohen (Sup.)
Schum, People ex rel. Brush v. (Sup.).
391 Smith v. Coles (Sup.)..
Schum, People ex rel. Fiske v. (Sup.). Schum, People ex rel. Fiske v. (Sup.).
967 Smith v. New York Cent. R. Co. (Sup.)..1130
Smith v. Smith (Sup.).
Schuster v. Tompkins (Sup.)....
Smith's Estate, In re (Sur.).
Schwartz Silk Corp. v. Hutchinson's Famous Shirt Hospital (Sup.)
Smith's Will, In re (Sup.).
Smith & Son, Rosenfeld v. (Sup.).
Schwartz & Co., Schall v. (Sup.)..
Smith & Sons, Rosenfeld v. (Sup.).
Scott v. Belle Harbor-Edgemere Realty Co.
Snyder, In re (Sup.)....
Snyder, Rowe v. (Sup.).
Scott, Twentieth Century Laundry Co. v.
Snyder v. Sisson (Sup.).
Soeurbee, Inc. v. Jatison Const. Co. (Sup.) 842
Ugovitch v. Ohio Farmers' Ins. Co., of Le
Roy, Ohio (Sup.)..
Underpinning & Foundation Co., Vogel v. (Sup.)
Wallace, Boyle v. (Sup.)...
Unger, McKeown v. (Sup.).
United Breeders' Co., Cain v. (Sup.).
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of
United States Transp. Co., Lord v. (Sup.)..1116
Universal Film Mfg. Co., Humiston v.
Vaccare v. McKee (Sup.)...
Vacuum Oil Co., Brown v. (Sup.).
Van Zonneveld, Henry v. (Sup.).
Washington Heights Café, Baer v. (Mun.
Wasserman v. New York (Sup.)
.1112 Waters, Faigin v. (Sup.)..
Waters v. Milliken (Sup.).
.1103 Watson Mach. Co. v. Baumann (Sup.).
95 Weill Co. v. Creveling (Sup.). 701 Weinshank v. Shack (Sup.).. .1132 Weinstein v. Leibowitz (Sup.). .1133 Weinstein v. Shotwell (Sup.).
Warhauer & Kolsby, Finkelstein v. (Sup.) 593
.1132 Waters & Co., Petze v. (Sup.).
(Sup.).. 159 Weed, In re (Sup.)....
621 Weisheit v. Pabst Brewing Co. (Sup.).
85 Wells, MacDonald v. (Sup.).. 586 Wendel's Estate, In re (Sup.). Werner v. Kelly, two cases (Sup.). Village of Elmsford, Lander v. (Sup.). Westchester County Brewing Co., Koster Village of Marcellus, Spinks v. (Sup.).... 69 v. (Sup.)... Village of Millbrook, Davis v. (Sup.).....1106 Village of Peekskill v. Putnam & W. Traction Co. (Sup.)..
.1128 Western Union Tel. Co., Dale v. (Sup.).. 783 .1106 West Side Warehouse Co., McCrory Stores 287 Corp. v. (Sup.).
Western Ins. Co., Rosalind Realty Co. v. (Sup.)
Visconti, People v. (Sup.).
Wettlaufer v. Woodward (Sup.)..
Vogel v. Underpinning & Foundation
Wheeler, American Dist. Steam Co. V.
Vogel, Inc., V. Mercantile Lunch (Sup.)
Wheeler v. Sigourney (Sup.).
Vollkommer v. New York (Sup.).
645 W. H. Gahagan, Inc., Poulsen v. (Sup.)..1126 ...1133 White, Moloughney v. (Sup.). White v. Voornis (Sup.).... White, Weed v. (Sup.). White Plains Road, In re (Sup.) White's Pure Food Eating Place, In re (Sup.)
Voorhis, People ex rel. Fitzgerald v. (Sup.).1124
Waldorf-Astoria Hotel Co., Hackney v.
Wiemers, Inc., v. American Fidelity Co.
Williams, Milton-Alvin Holding Co. V. (Sup.)
Woods, People ex rel. Miers v. (Sup.).
Williams, People ex rel. Dalton v. (Sup.)..1123
Willis v. Bird (Sup.)..
Wilson v. Huntington R. Co. (Sup.).
Wissner, Cahill v. (Sup.).
Wolff v. De Vaux (Sup.).
Wolff, Robert Colin Co. v. (Sup.).
(Sup.) 241 Zahka, Thomas v. (Sup.). .1112 Zahka, Thomas y. (Sup.).. 188 Zalewski, In re (Sup.)
289 Yanowitz V. George W. Travers Co.
Young, In re (Sup.)
125 Young, Klein v. (Sup.).
.1135 Young v. Lichtenberg (Sup.).
.1135 Youngentob, In re (Sup.).
NEW YORK SUPPLEMENT
WAGNER v. SHEFFIELD FARMS CO., Inc.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department. January 2, 1918.) MASTER AND SERVANT
330(3)—INJURIES TO THIRD PERSON-SUFFICIENCY OF
In an action for injuries sustained by plaintiff in stumbling over a milk receiver, evidence held insufficient to show that the receiver was placed before plaintiff's door by defendant's agent, who made delivery of milk in the building on the day of the accident.
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District.
Action by Yetta Wagner against the Sheffield Farms Company, Incorporated. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Judgment reversed, and complaint dismissed.
Argued December term, 1917, before GUY, BIJUR, and PHILBIN, JJ.
Alger & Ayres, of New York City (A. J. Peck, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Isadore Apfel, of New York City, for respondent.
GUY, J. The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries caused by plaintiff stumbling over a milk receiver, which had been placed in front of plaintiff's door in a tenement house. The accident occurred at 10 a. m. The uncontradicted testimony of defendant's driver was that on the day in question he made the deliveries of milk in that building at 7 o'clock a. m., and he denied having at that time anything to do with the milk receiver, which bore the initials of another company and admittedly was not the property of the defendant.
Plaintiff introduced some evidence that defendant and another milk company at times used each other's receivers in making deliveries; but this evidence was not sufficient to prove defendant's use of said receiver on the day of the accident, and there is no evidence to justify a finding that said receiver was placed in position before plaintiff's door by any act of the defendant or defendant's agent.
The judgment must therefore be reversed, with $30 costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. All concur.
For other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes 168 N.Y.S.-1