BILLS OF LADING. See ADMIRALTY, 1. BOUNDARIES. Maryland and West Virginia; Deakins line established. BROKERS. See BANKRUPTCY, 8. BURDEN OF PROOF. See FRAUD; JURISDICTION, C 3, 4; PATENTS, 3, 5, 10. CAPITAL CRIMES. See CRIMINAL LAW, 24, 30. CARRIERS. 1. Implied agreement as to carriage. The implied agreement of a common carrier is to carry safely and 2. Compensation for extra liability. A carrier who agrees to expedite assumes a more burdensome liability See INTERSTATE COMMERCE; JURISDICTION, F 7, 8, 9; CASES DISTINGUISHED. Gulf, Colorado & Sante Fe Ry. Co. v. Texas, 204 U. S. 403, distinguished in Ohio Railroad Commission v. Worthington, 101. Hancock National Bank v. Farnum, 176 U. S. 640, distinguished in Import Rate Case, 162 U. S. 197, distinguished in Interstate Com. Comm. Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Doughty, 208 U. S. 251, distinguished in The Irrawaddy, 171 U. S. 187, distinguished in The Jason, 33. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Crovo, 220 U. S. 364, distinguished in Norfolk CASES FOLLOWED. Agnew v. United States, 165 U. S. 36, followed in Hyde v. United States, Armour Packing Co. v. United States, 209 U. S. 56, followed in Hyde v. Bache v. Hunt, 193 U. S. 523, followed in Hirsh v. Taylor, 698. Bernardin v. Butterworth, 169 U. S. 600, followed in Duffield v. Ashurst, 697. Boyle v. Zacharie, 6 Pet. 648, followed in De Bearn v. De Bearn, 595. Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U. S. 89, followed in Mississippi Railroad Com- Coyle v. Smith, 221 U. S. 559, followed in Ex parte Webb, 663. Craemer v. Washington, 168 U. S. 124, followed in Low Wah Suey v. Backus, 460. Crain v. United States, 162 U. S. 625, followed in Johnson v. United Duryea Power Co. v. Sternbergh, 119 U. S. 115, followed in Andrews v. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co., 97 U. S. 126, followed in Westinghouse Co. v. Evans v. Stettnisch, 149 U. S. 605, followed in Johnson v. United States, Fore River Ship Building Co. v. Hagg, 219 U. S. 175, followed in Hirsh Garretson v. Clark, 111 U. S. 120, followed in Westinghouse Co. v. Haseltine v. Bank, 183 U. S. 130, followed in State National Bank v. Holden v. Stratton, 119 U. S. 115, followed in Andrews v. Partridge, 696. Indian Protective Assn. v. Gordon, 34 App. D. C. 553, followed in Same v. Same, 698. In re Sanford Fork & Tool Co., 160 U. S. 247, followed in Eastern Kansas Pacific R. R. Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R. Co., 112 U. S. Kelly v. 695. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Smith, 204 U. S. 551, followed in Sea- Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott, 191 U. S. 225, followed in Hirsh v. Taylor, McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U. S. 432, followed in Missouri Pacific Ry. McNeill v. Southern Ry. Co., 202 U. S. 543, followed in Ohio Railroad Commission v. Worthington, 101. Matter of Gregory, 219 U. S. 210, followed in Glasgow v. Moyer, 420. in De Bearn v. De Bearn, 695. Mueller v. Nugent, 184 U. S. 1, followed in Sullivan v. Goldman, 695. Knapp, 302. Railroad Company v. Jones, 177 U. S. 125, followed in Stalker v. Oregon Re Moran, 203 U. S. 96, followed in Coalgate Co. v. Hurst, 697. Richardson v. Shaw, 209 U. S. 365, followed in Sexton v. Kessler, 90. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, followed in State National Bank Security Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Prewitt, 200 U. S. 446, followed in Duffield Shoshone Mining Co. v. Rutter, 177 U. S. 505, followed in Coalgate Co. Southern Pacific R. R. Co. v. United States, 168 U. S. 1, followed in Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Young, 219 U. S. 498, followed in Southern Railway Co. v. Reid and Southern Railway Co. v. Reid & Beam, 222 U. S. 424, 444, followed in Southern Ry. Co. v. Burlington Tefft v. Munsuri, 222 U. S. 114, followed in Sullivan v. Goldman, 695; Andrews v. Partridge, 696. Toland v. Sprague, 12 Pet. 300, followed in De Bearn v. De Bearn, 695. setts, 167. United States v. Kissel, 218 U. S. 601, followed in Hyde v. United States, United States v. Pridgeon, 153 U. S. 48, followed in Coalgate Co. v. United States ex rel. Warden v. Chandler, 122 U. S. 643, followed in Duffield v. Ashurst, 697. Van Wyck v. Knevals, 106 U. S. 360, followed in Stalker v. Oregon Short. Wabash Railroad Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29, followed in Coalgate Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, followed in Missouri Winston v. United States, 172 U. S. 303, followed in Johnson v. United Wong Wing v. United States, 163 U. S. 228, followed in Low Wah Suey CERTIFICATE. See JURISDICTION, A 1. CERTIORARI. Writ granted on consent of Attorney General. In this case the defendant applied for a writ of certiorari and the At- CESSIONS OF TERRITORY. See INDIANS, 1. CHEROKEE INDIANS. See INDIANS, 2, 3. |