Слике страница
PDF
ePub

as we are reminded in the sixteenth verse, is emphatically appropriated to our blessed Saviour? And to what Hebrew word does it correspond? Theophilus. Christ is a Greek word, meaning The Anointed One, and is the same as The Messiah in Hebrew.

you

Reader. Can tell me what official persons were anointed among the Jews, at the time of their admission to office, or consecration? Theophilus. Prophets, priests, and kings.

Reader. And what was the signification of this ceremony?

Theophilus. It was an emblem of the communication of authority, and of the gifts and graces of the Holy Spirit.

Reader. True. And therefore when our Saviour is called the Messiah or the Christ, we are reminded that he has been appointed and qualified to act as the prophet, priest, and king of his church. "As no man was ever dignified by holding the three offices, so no person ever had the title of Messiah, the Anointed. One, but Jesus, the Christ. He alone is King of kings and Lord of lords: the king who governs the universe and rules in the hearts of his followers; the prophet, to instruct men in the way wherein they should go; and the great high priest, to make atonement for their sins," and to plead for them in heaven.

Let us thankfully acknowledge and submit to him in these high offices, to our eternal welfare and as Christians, those who, through divine mercy, have ourselves received

the anointing of the Holy Spirit, according to our measure,-may we walk worthy of our high vocation, and be finally made partakers of all the blessings of redemption!

HYMN.

Hark, the glad sound! the Saviour comes, The Saviour promised long!

Let every heart prepare a throne,

And every voice a song.

He comes the prisoners to release
In Satan's bondage held;
The gates of brass before him burst,
The iron fetters yield.

He comes from thickest films of vice
To clear the mental ray,
And on the eye-balls of the blind,
To pour celestial day.

He comes the broken heart to bind,
The bleeding soul to cure;
And with the treasures of his grace
To enrich the humble poor.
Our glad Hosannahs, Prince of Peace,
Thy welcome shall proclaim;
And heaven's eternal arches ring
With thy beloved name.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

being a just man, and not willing | Saviour; and express allusion to 'to make her a public example,was some of his most significant names. minded to put her away privily.

20 But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: "for that which is + conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost.

21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins. 22 Now all this was done that it might be fulfilled which was

I will make a few remarks on the

conduct and character of Joseph and Mary; and we will then consider more at length the fulfilment of Isaiah's prophecy, and the meaning of the names here given to our Lord.

Mary was espoused or betrothed, as was usual among the Jews, some time before she was taken home by Joseph, to live with him as his wife. This contract was binding upon both parties, who, in the eye of the law, were already regarded as married persons; so that, in case of separation, a formal divorce had now become as necessary as it would have been at any subsequent period. And hence we find that Joseph is

spoken of the Lord by the pro- already styled the husband of Mary, phet, saying,

23 Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.

24 Then Joseph being raised from sleep did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him, and

took unto him his wife:

25 And knew her not till she had brought forth "her first-born son; and he called his name JESUS.

The Fifth Year oefore the Common Account called Anno Domini.-r Luke i. 27. 8 Luke i. 35.-t Deut. xxiv. 1. Luke i. 35. ↑ Gr. begotten.-x Luke i. 31. That is, Saviour, Heb. y Acts iv. 12, & v. 31, & xiii. 23, 38.-z Is. vii. 14.—| Or, his name shall be called.— e Ex. xiii. 2. Luke ii. 7, 21.

Reader. We have here a brief notice of some circumstances attending the miraculous birth of our blessed

and Mary the wife of Joseph.

Now Joseph, being a just man, that is, as we should say, being a good man, kind, considerate, and merciful, and therefore, or, being a strict observer of the law, and yet,-not willing to expose Mary to infamy by a public accusation, was disposed to put her away privily; that is, to give her a writing of divorce in the presence of two witnesses, without assigning any reason. But even this he would not do without much deliberation, including, no doubt, prayer for divine direction. He thought on these things, we are told; he gave them an attentive consideration before he would venture to act.

The conduct of Joseph, in this difficult affair, contains many particulars which deserve our imitation. I will thank Theophilus to read a

passage in Henry, on the nineteenth verse, which I have marked with pencil.

Theophilus.- "It becomes us, in many cases, to be gentle towards those that come under suspicion of having offended, to hope the best concerning them, and make the best of that which at first appears bad, in hope that it may prove better." And again; "The necessary censures of those who have offended ought to be managed without noise ;-Christian love and Christian prudence will hide a multitude of sins, and great ones, as far as may be done without having fellowship with them."

Reader. Read the same author's remarks on the words While he thought on these things.

Theophilus. "Those who would have direction from God must think on things themselves, and consult with themselves. It is the thoughtful, not the unthinking, whom God will guide."

Mary. May I be allowed to ask whether you think that this history encourages us to regard our own dreams as containing prophetic hints, or conveying supernatural information?

[blocks in formation]

ness, we are yet by no means encouraged to attach any undue importance, or to affix any mysterious meaning, to our own common dreams. Let us be content to be guided by the leadings of Providence, the dictates of conscience, the advice of prudent friends, and our own careful deliberations, in subordination to the general rules of God's written word.

Theophilus. It must have been a great consolation to Joseph to hear the angel say, "Fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife."

Reader. Yes; and a great cause of thankfulness to that gracious Being who had so seasonably relieved him from his perplexity. There is also something very encouraging and delightful in the vindication of Mary's innocence. "Those who take care to keep a good conscience may cheerfully trust God with the keeping of their good names, and have reason to hope that he will clear up, not only their integrity, but their honour, as the sun at noon day."

I will now ask, have you any question to propose in connection with the history before us?

Theophilus. The infant Saviour is spoken of, in the last verse, as Mary's first-born son. Had Mary any other children afterwards?

Reader. We do not know; nor is the question of any importance. Some of the early Christian writers, falling into their very common error of seeming to be wise above what is written, affirm very confidently that Mary had no other children; and it was once a fashion among some peo

ple to be very angry with those who maintained the contrary supposition. But the truth is, that the fact is neither affirmed nor denied in Scripture, and that we have no means of correct information concerning it. When it is said that Jesus was Mary's firstborn son, that expression implies no more than that she had no child before his birth.

Let me now direct your attention to the remarkable and important prophecy quoted in the twenty-third verse. In what part of the Old Testament do we find it?

Theophilus. In the seventh chapter of Isaiah.-We there learn that Ahaz, king of Judah, was troubled with fear of Rezin, king of Syria, and Pekah, king of Israel, who had advanced, with their combined forces, against Jerusalem. Isaiah was commissioned to declare, in the name of God, that their attempt should fail. Ahaz was encouraged to ask a sign in confirmation of this prophecy; and when he had refused to do so, the prophet said, "Hear ye now, O house of David; Is it a small thing for you to weary men, but will ye weary my God also? Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel. Butter and honey shall he eat, that he may know how to refuse the evil, and to choose the good. For before the child shall know to refuse the evil, and to choose the good, the land that thou abhorrest shall be forsaken of both her kings."

Reader. Do you clearly under

stand that prophecy and its application?

Theophilus. The application to the Messiah, as made by the Evangelist, is strikingly evident and easy; but when I read the whole passage in Isaiah, I cannot exactly understand how the prophecy of Christ was a sign to Ahaz, or how the two verses following the one quoted by St. Matthew can apply to Christ at all.

Reader. It is clear from the expression, "all this was done that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Lord," that St. Matthew is indeed explaining and applying a prophecy,-not merely accommodating to his purpose a passage of Scripture otherwise unconnected with the subject. But, this being allowed, you ask, how could the declaration of Isaiah be a particular sign of the deliverance of Jerusalem in the time of Ahaz, as well as a prophecy of the still greater, but more remote, event, the birth of the Messiah? Interpreters give more than one answer to this inquiry.

The prophecy, say some, had a twofold signification; referring, in the first instance, to an event about to take place in the time of Ahaz; and also, in a higher sense, to the more distant and more important event, the birth of Messiah. They think it probable that Isaiah referred to some virgin then about to be married, perhaps to himself, and declared that after her marriage she would give birth to would give birth to a son, who would be no more than a mere infant when Syria and Samaria should

be overthrown; and who should be named Immanuel, in token of the

presence of God among his people, pleading their cause, and defeating their enemies. This was the sign to Ahaz and the men of his day. But it was also a type or pattern of a still greater event, even the future birth of the Messiah from a virgin, in an unprecedented and miraculous manner, who should be, in the full sense of the expression, God with us, God united to our own nature, and dwelling in the world.

Other commentators, however, reject this interpretation, as being unnecessarily complex, and at the same time low and unworthy of the subject. They think that the prophecy related primarily and entirely to Christ, without any other allusion whatever. And, say they, the promise of a future Messiah became a sign to Ahaz, inasmuch as it implied the continual preservation of his family, from which, according to promise, the Messiah was to spring. Perhaps this view of the prophecy is most approved, and most commonly adopted. And, in order that you may completely understand it, I will read to you a passage from a commentator on Isaiah, by whom it is strenuously defended. "What reference," says he, "had the birth of Christ to the present circumstances of the king and people of Judea? Or what had this sign to do with their deliverance from the kings of Israel and Syria? I answer, that this sign was given not to Ahaz, or to any of the rebellious unbelieving Jews, for they could not appreciate it; but to the faithful

few who still remained, and to whom the prophet now chiefly directed his discourse. His words may thus be paraphrased:- Since the king has refused the sign offered to him, Jehovah himself shall give you a sign, not which you shall behold with your eyes, or hear with your ears, but which, to those among you who have any real faith in his word, and any confidence in me, his prophet, will be more satisfactory than any other. In token, then, that the house of David shall not now be utterly destroyed, but that God will fulfil the promise he once made to Judah, that the sceptre should not depart from his posterity till the coming of Messiah, and to David; that his throne should be established for ever, Behold, at some future period, a virgin of David's house shall conceive, and bring forth a son, whom she will call by a name significative of his divine and human nature.' Now, to those who believed, this would be a sufficient assurance that the attempt of Rezin and Pekah to dethrone Ahaz, and set up one of another nation in his stead, would be fruitless. For how could this sign be accomplished if the family of David were destroyed?"

In this case, the following words of the prophet, Butter and honey shall he eat, &c., denote that the Messiah, although God with us, should yet, at the same time, be truly man, and, as such, should pass through the various stages of childhood, "growing in wisdom and stature." And the child mentioned in the sixteenth verse is not Immanuel, but

« ПретходнаНастави »