Слике страница
PDF
ePub

§ 10. Mutual benefit insurance.

*The death of an insured by suicide held
through violent and accidental means, within
the meaning of an accident policy.-Tuttle v.
Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'n (Iowa) 1131.

*Stipulation in accident insurance policy, ex-
empting insurer from liability on insured's
death by suicide, held not waived by insurer.-
Tuttle v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'n
(Iowa) 1131.

INTERNAL REVENUE.

Effect of omission of stamp from mortgage
note, see "Mortgages," § 2.

*The question of the want of a revenue
stamp on an insurance policy may not be
raised in an action thereon in a state court.
Ins. Co. (S. D.) 850.
-Wheaton v. Liverpool & London & Globe

INTERPLEADER.

An accident insurance policy held an Iowa
contract, though the agent procuring the appli-
cation therefor was insurer's agent, within Rev.
St. Mo. 1889, § 5915, and suicide was a defense, To enforce trusts, see "Trusts," § 5.
notwithstanding section 5855.-Tuttle v. Iowa
State Traveling Men's Ass'n (Iowa) 1131.

INTERROGATORIES.

An application for accident insurance held to To jury, see "Trial," § 6.
embrace a proposition relieving the insurer from
liability on insured's death by suicide.-Tuttle
v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'n (Iowa)
1131.

The secretary of local lodge in receiving
dues held to act as the agent of the grand
lodge of the order which issues the certificate.
-Soehner v. Grand Lodge of Order of Sons
of Herman (Neb.) 871.

V.

In an action on a certificate of a mutual
benefit association, held error to direct a
verdict for defendant.-Soehner Grand
Lodge of Order of Sons of Herman (Neb.) 871.
Conditions in a policy of insurance limiting or
avoiding liability are strictly construed against
the insurer, and liberally in favor of the insured.
-Soehner v. Grand Lodge of Order of Sons of
Herman (Neb.) 871.

INTERSTATE COMMERCE.

Regulation, see "Commerce."

INTOXICATING LIQUORS.

Act relating to sale of, as encroachment on
legislature, see "Constitutional Law," § 2.
Business exemptions of saloon keeper, see "Ex-
emptions," § 2.

Information for maintaining liquor nuisance,
see "Indictment and Information," § 3.
Mandamus to compel acceptance of liquor
dealer's bond, see "Mandamus," § 3.

Motion for new trial as condition to review of
judgment refusing or granting license to sell,
see "Appeal and Error," § 4.

Sale by traveling salesman without license, see
"Commerce," § 1.

Validity of ordinance prohibiting opening of
saloons on Sunday, see "Municipal Corpora-
tions," § 1.

*A certificate of a mutual benefit associa-
tion is a contract of insurance between the
member and the association.-Soehner v. Grand
Lodge of Order of Sons of Herman (Neb.) 871.
When the certificate of membership in a rail-1.
way relief department provides that the in-
demnity shall be forfeited by an action for
damages against the railway company, the
terms of the contract and not the rules of law
relative to the election of remedies will deter-
mine the consequences of such an election.-
Walters v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. (Neb.)

1066.

In an action on a benefit certificate by a
substituted beneficiary, evidence of the by-
law of the society, limiting beneficiaries to
persons named, held admissible.-Foss v. Pet-
terson (S. D.) 915.

*A holder of a benefit certificate held not
entitled, either under the by-law of the so-
ciety, or under Rev. Civ. Code, § 712, to make
a stranger a beneficiary.-Foss v. Petterson
(S. D.) 915.

INTENT.

As element of embezzlement, see "Embezzle-
ment."

In action for assault, see "Assault and Battery,"
§ 1.

Of bankrupt in making transfers, see "Bank-
ruptcy," § 1.

INTEREST.

Disqualification as witness by pecuniary inter-
est in subject of action, see "Witnesses," § 1.
On damages for breach of contract for sale of
realty, see "Vendor and Purchaser," § 6.
On tax certificates, see "Taxation," § 7.

INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION.
See "Injunction," § 2.

104 N.W.-76

Licenses and taxes.

City liquor tax paid by plaintiff held not paid
under mistake of law, and could not be recov-
ered back. Acts 25th Gen. Assem. p. 63. c. 62,
Code 1897, §§ 2448. 2450.-Ahlers v. City of
Estherville (Iowa) 453.

Under Code 1897, § 2455, a mulct tax im-
posed by city on saloon keepers held a "tax."--
Ahlers v. City of Estherville (Iowa) 453.

Comp. Laws, § 5386, held not to authorize
municipalities to fix the number of sureties
on liquor dealer's bonds.-Power v. Common
Council of Village of Litchfield (Mich.) 664.

determined, as required by Comp. Laws, § 5386,
That a common council of a village had not
the sufficiency of a liquor dealer's bond, held
shown by the facts.-Power v. Common Council
of Village of Litchfield (Mich.) 664.

The act of 1895 (Laws 1895, p. 122, c. 22) is
ineffectual as an amendment or repeal of sec-
tion 7155, Cobbey's Ann. St. 1903, which re-
quires an applicant for liquor license to sell
intoxicating liquors to give a bond in the sum
of $5,000, with at least two good and sufficient
sureties, freeholders of the county in which
the license is granted.-Lee v. Brittain (Neb.)
1076.

A city council held authorized to refuse to
one having a county license a city license for
retailing intoxicating liquors.-City of Center-
ville v. Gayken (S. D.) 910.

retailing intoxicating liquors held sufficient.-
City of Centerville v. Gayken (S. D.) 910.

An ordinance relative to a city license for

[blocks in formation]

* Point annotated. See syllabus.

[blocks in formation]

an instruction that a sale of patent medicine See "Patents."
is in effect a sale of a beverage unless made by
a registered pharmacist is erroneous.-State v.
Williams (N. D.) 546.

INVENTION.

INVENTORY.

*A place kept as a liquor nuisance, in viola- Of property insured, see "Insurance," § 3.
tion of Rev. Codes 1899, § 7605, may consist
of one or more buildings when they are both
used for the unlawful purpose as part of the
same premises.-State v. Brown (N. D.) 1112.

Under Rev. Pol. Code, §§ 2834, 2838, 2852,
held, there was a violation of the liquor license
law by a traveling salesman for liquor dealers
in another state taking orders within the state
to be filled in the other state.-State v. Dela-
mater (S. D.) 537.

4. Criminal prosecutions.

An information against a saloon keeper for
violating Comp. Laws, § 5409, held fatally
defective for failure to charge that a view
"of the bar or place in the room where liquors
were sold," etc., was obstructed.-People v.
Schimmell (Mich.) 670.

IRRIGATION.

See "Waters and Water Courses," § 4.

ISSUES.

In civil actions, see "Pleading," § 8.
Presented for review on appeal, see "Appeal
and Error," § 4.

JOINDER.

Of causes of action, see "Action," § 1.
Of offenses in indictment, see "Indictment and
Information," § 3.

JOINT TENANCY.

In a prosecution for violation of a municipal
ordinance prohibiting the opening of saloons
on Sunday, evidence held sufficient to support See "Tenancy in Common."
a conviction.-City of Duluth v. Abrahamson
(Minn.) 682.

Evidence held to sustain conviction of of-
fense of giving intoxicating liquors to a minor.
-State v. Hawkins (Minn.) 898.

*Whether a sale of patent medicine is made
as a medicine or as a beverage, and therefore
illegal under Rev. Codes 1899, § 7598, is a ques-
tion for the jury.-State v. Williams (N. D.)

546.

An information which alleges that defendant
during a stated time maintained a liquor nui-
sance, prohibited by Rev. Codes 1899, § 7605,
in two adjacent buildings, held neither uncer-
tain nor double.-State v. Brown (N. D.) 1112.
§ 5. Abatement and injunction.

Burden of proof in cases involving violation
of mulct law stated.-Jones v. Byington (Iowa)
473.

§ 6. Civil damage laws.

*One selling intoxicating liquor is liable, not
only for the actual results of the sale, but for
all damages growing out of the disqualification
resulting from or contributed to by such sale,
without reference to the time through which
such disqualification may continue.-Jessen v.
Wilhite (Neb.) 1064.

In an action by a wife to recover for dam-
age on account of the sale of liquor to her
husband, the defendant is not entitled to show
in mitigation of damages that the wife has
commenced proceedings for divorce.-Jessen v.
Wilhite (Neb.) 1064.

Where a husband becomes a habitual drunk-
ard, and abandons his family, and ceases to
provide for its support, whether such loss of
support is permanent or otherwise is a ques-
tion of fact for the jury.-Jessen v. Wilhite
(Neb.) 1064.

§ 7. Rights of property and contracts.
*A seller of liquors, intending to enable the
buyer to violate the liquor law, cannot recover

JUDGES.

See "Courts"; "Justices of the Peace."
Mandamus to judge, see "Mandamus," § 2.

JUDGMENT.

Certified judgment as evidence, see "Evidence,"
$ 8.

Conclusiveness of on assignment pendente lite,
see "Lis Pendens."
Decisions of courts in general, see "Courts,"
§ 1.
Enforcement by execution, see "Execution,"
§ 1.
In supplemental proceedings as affected by dis-
charge in bankruptcy, see "Bankruptcy," § 1.
Judicial notice as to existence of "Evidence,"
§ 1.

Liability of attorneys for proceeds of judgment
paid to client in disregard of rights of third
persons, see "Attorney and Client," § 1.
Liability of stockholder of bank in action on
judgment against bank, see "Banks and Bank-
ing," § 2.

Motion for judgment on pleadings, see "Plead-
ing," § 7.

Names of parties to, see "Names."
Presentation in record of grounds for review of
judgment on pleadings, see "Appeal and Er-
ror." § 8.

Priority between judgment and mortgage, see
"Mortgages," § 2.

Review, see "Appeal and Error."

In actions by or against particular classes of
parties.

Trustee in bankruptcy, see "Bankruptcy," § 1.

In particular civil actions or proceedings.
See "Cancellation of Instruments," § 1; “Di-
vorce," § 3; "Injunction," 4; "Quieting
Title," § 2; "Replevin," § 5.
See syllabus.

* Point annotated.

County seat removal contest, see "Counties,"
§ 1.
Foreclosure of mortgage, see "Mortgages," § 7.
For sale of land for taxes, see "Taxation," § 7.
For sale of property of decedent, see "Executors
and Administrators," § 5.

For separate maintenance, see "Husband and
Wife," § 4.

On appeal or writ of error, see "Appeal and
Error," $ 20.

Personal judgment for deficiency on foreclosure,
see "Mortgages," § 7.
Right of city to equitable relief against judg-
ment on municipal warrants, see "Equity,"
§ 1.

In criminal prosecutions.
See "Rape," § 2; "Receiving Stolen Goods."

1. By default.

Denial based on want of information held in-
sufficient to require the court to set aside a de-
fault judgment.-Tullis v. McClary (Iowa) 505.
*An officer's return to a summons held not
to show a compliance with Civ. Code, & 69
(Cobbey's Ann. St. 1903, § 1070), authorizing
service by leaving a copy at the usual residence
of the defendant.-Ruby v. Pierce (Neb.) 1142.
Facts held not to authorize the opening of
a default judgment under Rev. Code Civ.
Proc. 151.-Kjetland v. Pederson (S. D.)

677.

2. On trial of issues.

*Setting aside a verdict for one party and
entering judgment for the other without new
trial held improper.-Prowell v. Neuendorf
(Mich.) 666.

[blocks in formation]

V.

*The dismissal of a bill without prejudice
does not conclude the parties.-Morris
Linton (Neb.) 927; Linton v. Morris, Id.

A judgment in a suit to enjoin the transac-
tion of a banking business under the name of
a defunct corporation held not res judicata in a
subsequent action for wrongful appropriation of
the good will of the defunct corporation.-Lin-
demann v. Rusk (Wis.) 119.

§ 7. Conclusiveness of adjudication.
The plea of res judicata applies to the points
on which the court has pronounced judgment,
and to every point which properly belonged to
the subject-matter of litigation.-First Nat.
Bank v. Gibson (Neb.) 174.

A decree dissolving a temporary injunction is
not res judicata in a subsequent action against
the surety on the injunction bond.-McLennon
v. Fenner (S. D.) 218.

§ 8. Foreign judgments.

A foreign justice's judgment cannot be im-
peached by testimony that no indebtedness ex-

§ 3. Entry, record, and docketing.
Delay in entering a judgment pronounced in isted on which the judgment could have been

open court will not invalidate it in the absence
of fraud.-Gallaway V. Rochester Loan &
Banking Co. (Neb.) 922.

§ 4. Opening or vacating.

Where by his misconduct an attorney secured
any advantage over his client in certain litiga-
tion, the client may require the attorney to
account, but he is not necessarily entitled to
have the judgment obtained in such litigation
modified.-Dart v. Richardson (Minn.) 1094.

rendered. Morrison Mfg. Co. v. Rimerman
(Iowa) 279.

A judgment in garnishment in one state
is a bar to an action by the principal defend-
ant against the garnishee in the state of the
residence of the former.-Hadacheck v. Chi-
cago, B. & Q. Ry. Co. (Neb.) 878.

JUDICIAL NOTICE.

In civil actions, see "Evidence," § 1.

JUDICIAL. POWER.

In an action to have a judgment set aside
for misconduct of plaintiff's attorney, it was
incumbent on him to prove that the judg-
ment as entered was obtained by reason
of such fraudulent acts or on false testimony See "Constitutional Law," § 2.

adduced at the trial.-Dart v. Richardson
(Minn.) 1094.

JUDICIAL SALES.

*To justify a trial court in setting aside a
decree on the ground of fraud, it is sufficient Of property of decedent, see "Executors and

if facts and circumstances are proven from
which constructive fraud can be inferred,
and whereby the party seeking to avoid the de-
cree was induced to make no appearance.-
Arnout v. Chadwick (Neb.) 942.

§ 5. Equitable relief.

In an action to set aside a decree affecting
title to real estate, plaintiff cannot recover un-
less he has some interest in the title to the
property. Stull v. Masilonka (Neb.) 188.

City held not entitled to equitable relief
against default judgment on warrants, where
the defenses against the enforcement of the
warrants were, and had been for several years,
matters of public record.-City of Ft. Pierre v.
Hall (S. D.) 470.

*Where mistake, etc., is relied upon as ground
of relief against a judgment, the complaint
must show that plaintiff has not slumbered on
his rights.-City of Ft. Pierre v. Hall (S. D.)
470.

Administrators," § 5.

[merged small][ocr errors]

Amount in controversy, see "Appeal and Error,"
$ 2.
Of trial court pending appeal, see "Appeal and
Error," § 7.

Jurisdiction of particular actions or proceedings.
See "Libel and Slander," § 1; "Mandamus,"
§ 3; "Replevin," § 2.

Annulment of marriage, see "Marriage."
By trustee in bankruptcy, see "Bankruptcy,"
§ 1.
Highway proceedings, see "Highways," $ 1.
Relief against judgment, see "Judgment," § 5.
To construe will, see "Wills," § 4.

Jurisdiction of particular subjects.
Establishment of lost instruments, see "Lost
Instruments."

* Point annotated. See syllabus.

[blocks in formation]

Review of proceedings.
To confer jurisdiction on a district court on

Justices' courts in civil cases, see "Justices of appeal from a justice the justice's docket must the Peace," § 1.

Particular courts, see "Courts."

See "Grand Jury."

JURY.

Amendment and revision of statutes, see "Statutes," § 3.

Custody and conduct, see "Criminal Law," $ 14.

Deficiency in number of names in jury box at time of drawing indictment as ground for motion to quash, see "Indictment and Information," § 4.

Instructions in civil actions, see "Trial," § 5. Instructions in criminal prosecutions, see "Criminal Law," §§ 6-14.

Questions for jury in civil actions, see "Trial," § 4.

|

show affirmatively, under Code Civ. Proc. § 1086, 1087, not only that proper undertaking was executed within the prescribed time, but that it was entered on justice's records.-Caster v. Scheuneman (Neb.) 152.

*Under Rev. Codes 1895, § 6776, regulating ap peals in justices' courts, the undertaking must be served within 30 days after judgment.Lough v. White (N. D.) 518.

*That the undertaking on appeal from a justice was presented to the clerk of the district court and approved before the notice of appeal and undertaking was served held not irregularity, invalidating the appeal.— Thompson v. Fargo Plumbing & Heating Co. (N. D.) 525.

an

was validly appealed from the justice, and the Under Rev. St. 1898, § 3769, where a cause Statutory provisons relating to time for draw-question of the justice's jurisdiction was raised. ing of jurors as repugnant to constitutional the circuit court, finding that the justice had provision relative to terms of court, no jurisdiction, was bound to dismiss the ac"Courts," § 1. tion. Miltimore v. Hoffman (Wis.) 841.

see

Taking case or question from jury at trial, see "Trial," § 4.

Verdict in civil actions, see "Trial," § 6.

1. Right to trial by jury.

Acts 30th Gen. Assem. p. 62, c. 68, § 6, relating to appeals from orders establishing drainage districts, held not in conflict with Const. art. 1, § 9, relating to trial by jury.-Sisson v. Board of Sup'rs of Buena Vista County (Iowa) 454.

A justice's return on appeal held not defective for failure to certify the person by whom the notice was delivered to the justice. -Miltimore v. Hoffman (Wis.) 841.

A notice of appeal from a justice of the peace, entitled the same as the action was entered on the justice's docket, held sufficient.Miltimore v. Hoffman (Wis.) 841.

JUSTIFICATION.

§ 2. Summoning, attendance, discharge, Of homicide, see "Homicide,” § 2. and compensation.

Under Pub. Acts 1903, p. 37, No. 31, jury
drawn by jury commissioner instead of county
clerk held not lawfully drawn.-Fornia v. Fra-
zer (Mich.) 147.
33.

Competency of jurors, challenges,
and objections.

*The objection that a juror is disqualified because of having been convicted of a felony held waived.-Turley v. State (Neb.) 934.

JUSTICES OF THE PEACE.

KNOWLEDGE.

Actual or constructive knowledge, see "Notice."

LACHES.

In suing to set aside deed, see "Cancellation of Instruments," § 1; "Deeds," § 1.

LAKES.

Certified judgment of as evidence, see "Evi- See "Waters and Water Courses," § 1. dence," § 8.

Conclusiveness of judgment by foreign justice of the peace, see "Judgment," § 8. Garnishment proceedings in general, see "Garnishment," § 3.

Record on appeal from intermediate court, see
"Appeal and Error," § 8.

§ 1. Civil jurisdiction and authority.
*An objection to the jurisdiction of a justice,
urged on a special appeal from a justice, held
waived by consenting to go to trial on the mer-
its after the special appeal was dismissed.-
McCall v. Van Dusen (Mich.) 326.

§ 2. Procedure in civil cases.

*Rev. Codes 1899, § 5297, allowing the correction of mistakes in pleading, process, or proceeding, is applicable to a justice court.Morgridge v. Stoefer (N. D.) 1112.

Summons in a justice court not showing the Christian name of each partner is an irregularity which may be cured by amendment.Morgridge v. Stoefer (N. D.) 1112.

Where a justice transferred a cause to another specified justice, in the absence of a further showing, another justice could acquire no jurisdiction under such order to try the cause.-Miltimore v. Hoffman (Wis.) 841.

LANDLORD AND TENANT.

See "Use and Occupation."

Abandonment of easement, see "Easements," § 1.

Claim and delivery by landlord for portion of tenant's crop, see "Replevin," § 5. Compensation for injury to demised premises under power of eminent domain, see "Eminent Domain," § 2.

Creation of easements by lease, see "Ease ments," § 2.

Indictment of tenant for larceny, see "Indictment and Information," § 3.

Lease of homestead, see "Homestead," § 2.
Priority of purchase-money mortgage of chat-
tels over lien for rent, see "Chattel Mort-
gages," § 2.

Railroad leases, see "Railroads," § 2.
Right to prevent lessee from painting sign on
party wall, see "Party Walls.'

§ 1. Leases and agreements in general. The rule that, where a lease is susceptible of two constructions, the one most favorable to the lessee must prevail, is not invoked when the intention of the parties is determi nable from the language of the lease.-Pere * Point annotated. See syllabus.

Marquette R. Co. v. Wabash R. Co. (Mich.) 650.

It is sufficient ground for refusal by a lessee to accept the premises that material changes were made in their condition between the execution of the lease and the time of delivery.Rosenstein v. Cohen (Minn.) 965.

§ 2. Terms for years.

A provision in a lease of lodge rooms between two lodges requiring the consent of both to the renting of the rooms to any other lodge held not waived.-Portage Grange, Patrons of Husbandry, No. 16, v. Free & Accepted Masonic Lodge, No. 340 (Mich.) 667.

Where owner of certain premises leased it to two tenants as joint lessees with the privilege of an additional term, held necessary for both tenants to exercise the option to continue the lease on its expiration.-Tweedie v. P. E. Olson Hardware & Furniture Co. (Minn.) 895.

*Where a tenant denies his landlord's title, the latter may treat it as a disseisin, and the tenancy is thereby terminated without notice to quit.-Schwoebel v. Fugina (N. D.) 848.

§ 3. Premises, and enjoyment and use thereof.

The owner of an apartment house must exercise ordinary care to maintain in repair the railings around the porches, where children of tenants were allowed to play.-Widing v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. (Minn.) 239.

Where the owner of an apartment house rented the flats therein for housekeeping purposes,

1205

*A contract for farming of land for a share of the crops rendered the parties tenants in common of the crops.-Rector V. Anderson (Minn.) 884.

LARCENY.

See "Embezzlement"; "False Pretenses"; "Receiving Stolen Goods."

Conviction of larceny under indictment for conspiracy, see "Conspiracy," § 2.

Disposal of crops subject to landlord's lien, see "Landlord and Tenant," § 4.

Indictment for, see "Indictment and InformaInstructions in general, see "Criminal Law," tion," § 3. Review of rulings, see "Criminal Law," § 18. §§ 9, 11. § 1.

Prosecution and punishment.

In prosecution for larceny, nonconsent of owner to taking may be shown by testimony of agent's nonconsent and by confessions of defendant.-State v. Bjelkstrom (S. D.) 481.

LAW OF THE CASE.

Decision on appeal, see "Appeal and Error," § 19.

Rulings not excepted to, see "Appeal and Error," §§ 12-19.

LAW OF THE ROAD.

and the children of occupants played on the See "Highways," § 3.
porches thereof, a child playing on porch of an-
other tenant was not a trespasser, nor a mere
licensee. Widing v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co.
(Minn.) 239.

LEASES.

In an action for injuries to a child of a ten- See "Landlord and Tenant." ant of an apartment house by the breaking of a defective porch railing, whether defendant was liable was a question for the jury.-Widing v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. (Minn.) 239.

In an action to recover for injuries caused by failure of a landlord to repair, evidence held not to show plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence. Barron v. Liedloff (Minn.) 289.

See "Wills."

LEGACIES.

LEGACY TAX.

LEGISLATIVE POWER.

See "Taxation," § 10.

*In an action by plaintiff to recover for injuries sustained by the alleged negligence of a landlord in making and failing to make repairs, evidence held to sustain a verdict that defendants were guilty of negligence.-Barron v. See "Constitutional Law," § 2. Liedloff (Minn.) 289.

LETTERS PATENT.

*Where a landlord agrees to repair the leased premises, if his negligence results in an unsafe condition of the premises, he is liable for in- For inventions, see "Patents." juries caused to persons lawfully on the premises, not guilty of contributory negligence.Barron v. Liedloff (Minn.) 289.

§ 4. Rent and advances.

Under Acts 29th Gen. Assem. p. 106, c. 146, § 1. making it larceny for a tenant of farm lands to dispose of crops subject to a landlord's lien, an indictment failing to charge that the tenancy was of farm lands is fatally defective. State v. Ashpole (Iowa) 281.

§ 5. Renting on shares.

A tenant, cultivating a farm under a contract by which he is entitled to one-half the crops, may, before a division, mortgage his interest therein.-Denison v. Sawyer (Minn.) 305.

LEVEES.

Construction of dikes by private persons, see Creation of easement for in deed, see "Deeds," "Waters and Water Courses," § 2. § 2.

LEVY.

Of taxes, see "Taxation," § 4.

LIBEL AND SLANDER.

§ 1. Criminal responsibility. Where a newspaper mailed copies of a paper containing a libel to subscribers in other counties, he was punishable either in the county where the paper was published or in any county to which copies were sent, under Rev. Code Gr. Proc. §§ 72, 73.-State v. Huston (S. D.) 451. Point annotated. See syllabus.

Where parties were tenants in common in crops, a landowner could not be guilty of converting the crops, unless he sold, destroyed, or removed them from the farm.-Rector v. Anderson (Minn.) 884.

« ПретходнаНастави »