Presidential Directive on the Use of Polygraphs and Prepublication Review: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, First and Second Sessions ... April 21, 28, 1983, and February 7, 1984U.S. Government Printing Office, 1985 - 422 страница |
Друга издања - Прикажи све
Чести термини и фразе
122 Cannon House access to classified access to SCI administration American ANSLEY Cannon House Office Central Intelligence Agency Chairman Civil and Constitutional classified information classified material clearance Committee on Post concerning CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Congressman criminal Decision Directive 84 Defense deleted Department Director disclosed disclosure of classified Don Edwards example Executive Order Foreign Policy Foreign Service former employees former government officials Frank Snepp Group of 77 Honorable Patricia Schroeder House Office Building Howard Hunt investigation issues leaks LIBRARY OF CONGRESS manuscript MAYERFELD National Security Agency negotiations Office and Civil PASHAYAN Pentagon Papers person personnel political polygraph examinations polygraph tests Post Office prepublication review President President's Presidential directive prior prior restraint problem prosecution published questions response secrecy agreement secret Senator SENSENBRENNER sensitive compartmented information Sigint Snepp Subcommittee on Civil submit Thank tion Identified U.S. House unauthorized disclosure United White House WILLARD writing
Популарни одломци
Страница 43 - They conferred, as against the government, the right to be let alone— the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
Страница 22 - Those guarantees are not for the benefit of the press so much as for the benefit of all of us. A broadly defined freedom of the press assures the maintenance of our political system and an open society.
Страница 39 - The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, paper and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Страница 162 - ... official designated to oversee the agency information security program or by an official with Top Secret classification authority. Classification authority under this provision shall be exercised personally, on a document-by-document basis. 1-607. Classification may not be restored to documents already declassified and released to the public under this Order or prior Orders.
Страница 170 - Whoever, with intent or reason to believe that it is to be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation...
Страница 24 - The fact that for approximately one hundred and fifty years there has been almost an entire absence of attempts to impose previous restraints upon publications relating to the malfeasance of public officers is significant of the deep-seated conviction that such restraints would violate constitutional right.
Страница 169 - Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp., 333 US 103, 68 S.Ct.
Страница 175 - ... uncontroversial — such as whether the compromised information was properly classified in the first place and whether the article disclosing it was accurate. In most cases, particularly those of extreme sensitivity, however, the whole process reaches an impasse at question 9, which reads as follows: Whether the data can be declassified for the purpose of prosecution and, if so, the name of the person competent to testify concerning the declassification. The intelligence agencies view this as...
Страница 65 - ... only with disclosures of classified information. By Executive Order, the only information that can be classified is information which 'reasonably could be expected to cause damage to the national security* if released without proper authorization.
Страница 170 - national defense" as used in a predecessor of § 793 were held by a unanimous court to have "a well understood connotation" — a "generic concept of broad connotations, referring to the military and naval establishments and the related activities of national preparedness" — and to be "sufficiently definite to apprise the public of prohibited activities" and to be consonant with due process.