DEEDS AND CONVEYANCES-Continued.
ties and their heirs, in the absence of intervening rights of creditors or purchasers. The same principle applies to an unregistered assignment of a mortgage. Ibid.
4. Deed of Administrator-Fraud on Heirs-Purchaser With No- tice.-Equity will set aside a conveyance of lands made under the power of sale in a mortgage, procured through collusion with an administrator in fraud of the rights of the heirs at law of his intestate, in the absence of intervening rights of creditors or purchasers. Ibid.
5. Statute of Limitations-Principal.-The statute of limitations does not begin to run against the principal of a mortgage of lands until it is due, and the power of sale contained in the mortgage may be exercised within ten years after the ma- turity of the principal. Scott v. Lumber Co., 44.
6. Statute of Limitations-Power of Sale Optional Upon Default of Interest. The statute of limitations does not begin to run upon default in payment of annual interest upon the prin- cipal, when the power of sale contained in the mortgage is optional with the mortgagee upon default of either interest or principal of the debt. Ibid.
7. Executors-Sale Under Mortgage Contract-Designated by the Will.-When a power of sale in a mortgage is given to the mortgagee, "his executors," etc., upon default, and the mort- gagee dies leaving a will under which his executors qualify, the power of sale vests in the executors by virtue of the statute and the contract in the mortgage. Ibid.
8. Foreign Executors-Attempted Conveyance—Assignment of Debt.-A deed to real property made by foreign executors by virtue of authority in the will is void in North Carolina unless the executors qualify here, and operates only as an assignment of the debt and security, and not as a conveyance of the land. Ibid.
9. Foreign Executors-Deed—Subsequent Qualification.-A deed made by foreign executors to purchasers at a sale under the power of sale in a mortgage is an execution of the contract in the mortgage, and the subsequent probate of the will in the county wherein the lands lie relates back to the time of and validates such deed, when there are no intervening rights of third persons. Ibid.
10. Probate Officer an Employee.-A proper officer to take acknowl- edgment of grantors and privy examination of married wo- men to conveyances of land is not disqualified to act therein when he is an employee of the grantee, without any interest in the land conveyed. Smith v. Lumber Co., 47.
DEEDS AND CONVEYANCES-Continued.
11. Sufficient Registration-Notice.-The registration of a deed
showing the probate, including the separate examination of the wife, and the order of registration, and the names of the grantors, but omitting a copy of their signatures at the end of the instrument, is sufficient notice under section 980, Re- visal 1905. Ibid.
12. Registration-Notice-Duty of Grantors.-When the Register of Deeds receives from the grantors a deed for registration, the filing for registration is sufficient notice under section 980, Revisal 1905, and the duty of the grantors respecting such registration is at an end. Ibid.
13. Quit-claim Deed-Interest Passed.—Giving a quit-claim deed is no assertion of title, but a conveyance only of such interest as the maker has in the subject-matter. Lumber Co. v. Price, 50.
14. Quit-claim Deed—Estoppel in Pais.—A quit-claim deed for land reciting an invalid tax deed as the source of title, made by the attorney of plaintiff to the defendant, the plaintiff receiv- ing the consideration, is not an equitable estoppel in pais, and the plaintiff may assert its rights under a registered deed therefor to the timber growing upon the land. Ibid.
15. Standing Trees-Description—Sufficiency.-Standing trees are a part of the realty, and a conveyance of title thereto has to be sufficient to convey realty; and a contract for cutting timber, without the proper words of conveyance and a suffi- ciently definite description of the land upon which the same is standing, is void against purchasers for value under a sufficient deed subsequently registered. Tremaine v. Wil-
16. Registration - Possession
value under a sufficient and registered deed are not affected with notice by the possession of those under a prior deed if invalid or registered upon an invalid probate. No notice, however full or formal, can supply the notice by registration required by the statute. Ibid.
17. Admission of Title-Contract with Grantor-Personal Cove- nant.-An admission by the defendant in his answer that the title to the timber passed to the plaintiff estops the defend- ant from asserting the right to cut it under a contract pre- viously made by him with the grantor, such being a personal covenant, and not one running with the land. Ibid.
18. Covenant-Abandonment-Possession-Continuity-Transfer of Right. When the continuity of possession has been pre- served, to transfer a right is no abandonment of the property:
DEEDS AND CONVEYANCES-Continued.
Therefore, when a conveyance of land demands certain re- quirements after setting forth the covenant, with provision that the land shall revert if abandoned, the grantee may convey subject to the requirements, when there is no pro- vision of forfeiture and the intention of the original grantors is preserved; and such requirements, in the nature of cove- nants, are enforcible in a court of equity against subsequent purchasers with notice, though, technically, they do not run with the land. Church v. Bragaw, 126.
19. Covenant-Condition Subsequent-Forfeiture Avoided.-When a conveyance of land leaves in doubt whether a certain clause is intended as a covenant or a condition subsequent, under the policy of the law to avoid a forfeiture, it will be construed as a covenant, when possible. Ibid.
20. Estoppel by Deed.-Plaintiff claiming the inheritance of the land by the right of survivorship of her ancestor under the terms of the will cannot deny the fee-simple title of her grantee under a deed thereto made by her for a valuable consideration. Walker v. Taylor, 175.
21. Executors-Power to Sell-Option of Purchase.-A power un- der a will to executors to sell land is valid, but does not include the power to give an option to purchase. Trogden v. Williams, 192.
22. Option of Purchase-Delivery of Deed-Condition Precedent- Tender of Price.-A provision in an option that those to whom it was given should make partial payment for the land and secure the balance of the purchase-price by mort- gage thereon within the time specified is binding only upon an unconditional acceptance of and a compliance with the terms, and the delivery of the deed is not a condition prece- dent to the tender of the price in the absence of a definite agreement to that effect. Ibid.
23. Same-Two Executors-Joint Powers-Waiver.-One of two executors may not waive the condition of time of an option given for the purchase of lands of his testator and fix no time limit for payment, in the absence of express power; and where there are two executors clothed with the power to sell land, such power must be exercised by them jointly; and a waiver by one, otherwise having the power, does not bind the other. This also applies to sale of lands by executors under section 82, Revisal. Ibid.
24. Same-Intervening Rights - Waiver - Time the Essence.- Where one of two executors who have given an option for the sale of lands of their testator waives the conditions
DEEDS AND CONVEYANCES—Continued.
thereof, and the other, after notice of election by those hav- ing the right to take the lands embraced in the option, writes that he is willing to make the deed, but could not comply with further demands not therein contained, and afterwards said he would make the deed with his co-executor; the letter is not a waiver; and such waiver would be inoperative to revive the extinct option and affect intervening rights, time being of the essence of the contract. Ibid.
25. Recorded Option-Notice-Cloud upon Title.—A recorded op- tion on lands given by executors having the power under the will is notice of its terms only, and the time within which it should be exercised; and an unregistered waiver of the time limit by the executors in consenting to execute the deed thereafter is inoperative against a purchaser for value under a sufficient and subsequent registered conveyance, made by those who had the right of election to take the lands em- braced in the option, and a court of equity will not place a cloud upon the title by making a decree requiring the execu- tors to convey such title as they may have; and the execu- tors are not liable in damages upon refusing to make such conveyance. Ibid.
26. Note Under Seal-Registration-Purchase-price-Subsequent Mortgage. A note under seal, reciting that it was given for the balance of the purchase-price of certain land, executed and registered, does not attach to the legal title a trust for its payment or constitute a lien thereon. A judgment on the note, rendered after the execution and registration of a second mortgage by the same person to secure a different debt, cannot constitute a lien prior to that of the second mortgage. Carpenter v. Duke, 291.
27. Tax Deed-Maker-Ex-Sheriff.-A tax deed, signed and exe- cuted by one who was the Sheriff of the county at the time of the sale of land for taxes, after the expiration of his term of office, as "ex-sheriff," is authorized by Revisal 1905, sec. 950, and is to that extent valid. Manufacturing Co. v. Rosey, 370.
28. Same-Made After Two Years From Sale Day-Statute-Void. Under the Laws of 1901, ch. 588, and the Revisal 1905, sec. 2905, a tax deed made by a sheriff more than "two years from the day of sale of the real estate for taxes," etc., is void, the authority of the Sheriff to make the deed being solely de- rived from the statute; the statute being capable of a strict construction only, the time limitation must be observed.
DEEDS AND CONVEYANCES-Continued.
29. Same—Purchaser—Money Paid—Lien.—A purchaser of land at a tax sale under the statute, subsequently acquiring an in- valid title by reason of insufficient description, or void for not having been made within the statutory time, is entitled to have the amount he has paid therefor declared a lien on the land in his favor. Ibid.
30. Parol Trust-Definite Terms-Judgment in Personam.-A gift of land by deed to the children of a son upon his parol prom- ise to pay the daughter of the donor a certain sum of money is not sufficiently definite in its terms to attach to the legal title a trust for its payment, but is a valid considera- tion to support the promise upon which a judgment in per- sonam can be rendered. Faust v. Faust, 383.
31. Consideration-Evidence-Prima Facie.-The consideration ex- pressed in a deed is prima facie evidence of the actual con- sideration, and not conclusive. Ibid.
32. Lease-Renewal—Covenants—Form.—In a lease of land con- taining an agreement, or covenant, giving privilege of re- newal to lessee upon notice given, the covenant expressed by the agreement is not required to be in a technical form; upon the required notice being given within the proper time, the covenant, when sufficiently definite, and in the absence of any restraining stipulations, will be enforced as incident to the lease, conferring an assignable right and constituting a part of the tenant's interest in the land. Barbee v. Green- berg, 430.
Partnerships Retiring Parnter — Assignee.--Where there was a lease of a business lot for partnership purposes, containing a covenant of renewal, and one of the partners retired, having sold and transferred his entire interest in the business to his associate, the lease passed by the transfer as a partnership asset, and the right of renewal passed as inci- dental to the lease, conferring upon the assignee and his suc- cessors the privilege of its covenant. Ibid.
34. Lease-Covenants-Renewal-Assignee.-The assignee of a lease, with the right to demand a renewal of the lease for his own benefit, can make such right available as a defense in an action to recover the possession, though the same be instituted before a justice of the peace. Ibid.
35. Cancellation-Mental Capacity-Burden of Proof.—When in an action to set aside and cancel a deed for the want of sufli- cient mental capacity, there was evidence tending to show that prior and subsequent to the time of its execution the grantor was subject to attacks during which she was men-
« ПретходнаНастави » |