CONTROVERSY 'Mr. Angell's pamphlet was a work as unimposing in form as it was daring in expression. For a time nothing was heard of it in public, but many of us will remember the curious way in which... Norman Angellism" suddenly became one of the principal topics of discussion amongst politicians and journalists all over Europe. Naturally at first it was the apparently extravagant and paradoxical elements that were fastened upon most that the whole theory of the commercial basis of war was wrong, that no modern war could make a profit for the victors, and that-most astonishing thing of all -a successful war might leave the conquerors who received the indemnity relatively worse off than the conquered who paid it. People who had been brought up in the acceptance of the idea that a war between nations was analogous to the struggle of two errand boys for an apple, and that victory inevitably meant economic gain, were amazed into curiosity. Men who had never examined a Pacifist argument before read Mr. Angell's book. Perhaps they thought that his doctrines sounded so extraordinarily like nonsense that there really must be some sense in them or nobody would have dared to propound them."-The New Stateman, October 11, 1913. "The fundamental proposition of the book is a mistake. And the proposition that the extension of national territory-that is the bringing of a large amount of property under a single administration-is not to the financial advantage of a nation appears to me as illusory as to maintain that business on a small capital is as profitable as on a large.... The armaments of European States now are not so much for protection against conquest as to secure to themselves the utmost possible share of the unexploited or imperfectly exploited regions of the world.'-The late ADMIRAL MAHAN. 'I have long ago described the policy of The Great Illusion... not only as a childish absurdity but a mischievous and immoral sophism.'-MR. FREDERIC HARRISON. Among the mass of printed books there are a few that may be counted as acts, not books. The Contrat Social was indisputably one; and I venture to suggest to you that The Great Illusion is another. The thesis of Galileo was not more diametrically opposed to current ideas than those of Norman Angell. Yet it had in the end a certain measure of success.'-VISCOUNT ESHER. 'When all criticisms are spent, it remains to express a debt of gratitude to Mr. Angell. He belongs to the cause of internationalism-the greatest of all the causes to which a man can set his hands in these days. The cause will not triumph by economics. But it cannot reject any ally. And if the economic appeal is not final, it has its weight. "We shall perish of hunger," it has been said, "in order to have success in murder." To those who have ears for that saying, it cannot be said too often.'-Political Thought in England, from Herbert Spencer to the Present Day, by ERNESt Barker. 'A wealth of closely reasoned argument which makes the book one of the most damaging indictments that have yet appeared of the principles governing the relation of civilized nations to one another, The Quarterly Review. 'Ranks its author with Cobden amongst the greatest of our pamphleteers, perhaps the greatest since Swift.'-The Nation. 'No book has attracted wider attention or has done more to stimulate thought in the present century than The Great Illusion.-The Daily Mail. One of the most brilliant contributions to the literature of international relations which has appeared for a very long time.—Journal of the Institute of Bankers. ... To-day, Mr. 'After five and a half years in the wilderness, Mr. Norman Angell has come back. His book provoked one of the great controversies of this generation. Angell, whether he likes it or not, is a prophet whose prophesies have come true. It is hardly possible to open a current newspaper without the eye lighting on some fresh vindication of the once despised and rejected doctrine of Norman Angellism,'-The Daily News, February 25, 1920. |