The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, 1963-1965: Genocide, History, and the Limits of the LawCambridge University Press, 8. 3. 2010. - 340 страница The Frankfurt Auschwitz trial was the largest, most public, and most important trial of Holocaust perpetrators conducted in West German courts. Drawing on a wide range of archival sources, Devin O. Pendas provides a comprehensive history of this momentous event. Situating the trial in a thorough analysis of West German criminal law, the book argues that in confronting systematic, state-sponsored genocide, the Frankfurt court ran up against the limits of law. This book also provides a compelling account of the divided response to the trial among the West German public. |
Из књиге
Резултати 1-3 од 51
Страница 125
... Kaul felt it imperative that he be able to serve as civil counsel right from the very start of the trial , if he was to deal competently with the " pinnacle ' of the West German Nazi defenders , " such as Laternser and defense attorney ...
... Kaul felt it imperative that he be able to serve as civil counsel right from the very start of the trial , if he was to deal competently with the " pinnacle ' of the West German Nazi defenders , " such as Laternser and defense attorney ...
Страница 127
... Kaul's application . Kaul's attempt to respond was again denied by the court . Laternser , however , objected , this time at great length , saying that it was irrelevant whether Kaul could pass the formal legal hurdles regarding his ...
... Kaul's application . Kaul's attempt to respond was again denied by the court . Laternser , however , objected , this time at great length , saying that it was irrelevant whether Kaul could pass the formal legal hurdles regarding his ...
Страница 129
... Kaul returned with his new evidence . Laternser nonetheless contin- ued to protest Kaul's admission as civil counsel.41 He again complained that Kaul was allowed to speak before being formally admitted as civil counsel.42 Kaul , allowed ...
... Kaul returned with his new evidence . Laternser nonetheless contin- ued to protest Kaul's admission as civil counsel.41 He again complained that Kaul was allowed to speak before being formally admitted as civil counsel.42 Kaul , allowed ...
Садржај
Prelude | 24 |
Motivation Action | 53 |
The Trial Actors | 80 |
Ауторска права | |
други делови (9) нису приказани
Друга издања - Прикажи све
Чести термини и фразе
Accessory to Mord accomplice accused actions argued Auschwitz-Prozeß Boger charges civil counsel claim concentration camp context convicted December December 21 decision defendants defense attorneys Deutschland evidence extermination fact Federal Republic FFStA 4 Ks Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial Frankfurter Rundschau Fritz Bauer gas chambers genocide German courts German criminal German law Großmann guilt Hofmeyer Holocaust Ibid IG Farben indictment individual inmates investigation Jews judges juridical justice Kaduk Kaul Kaul's killing Klehr Kuczynski Langbein Laternser Laternser's motives Mulka Munich murder Nachlaß Kaul Naumann Nazi crimes Nazi past Nazi trials Nazism Neue NS-Verbrechen Nuremberg Oberscharführer orders Ormond participants particular perpetrators perpetratorship Plädoyer political prosecution prosecution's prosecutor's office prosecutors punishment question Rechtsstaat Robert Mulka Rögner role Roxin specific Stuttgart survivors tactical testified testimony Third Reich tion truth Ulrich Herbert University Press verdict Vergangenheitsbewältigung Verlag Vermerk victims Vogel Waffen SS West German Wilhelm Boger witnesses Wojak