The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, 1963-1965: Genocide, History, and the Limits of the LawCambridge University Press, 8. 3. 2010. - 340 страница The Frankfurt Auschwitz trial was the largest, most public, and most important trial of Holocaust perpetrators conducted in West German courts. Drawing on a wide range of archival sources, Devin O. Pendas provides a comprehensive history of this momentous event. Situating the trial in a thorough analysis of West German criminal law, the book argues that in confronting systematic, state-sponsored genocide, the Frankfurt court ran up against the limits of law. This book also provides a compelling account of the divided response to the trial among the West German public. |
Из књиге
Резултати 1-3 од 84
Страница 30
... evidence over indirect and that indirect evidence cannot substitute for direct evidence in a trial but does not prohibit hearsay testimony in the manner of American law . See Karl Peters , Strafprozeß : Ein Lehrbuch , 4th rev . ed ...
... evidence over indirect and that indirect evidence cannot substitute for direct evidence in a trial but does not prohibit hearsay testimony in the manner of American law . See Karl Peters , Strafprozeß : Ein Lehrbuch , 4th rev . ed ...
Страница 84
... evidence were and are often much stricter . 12 It is this obligation to evaluate freely any and all evidence that grounds the judicial interrogation of witnesses under German law . However , this questioning is done , again in contrast ...
... evidence were and are often much stricter . 12 It is this obligation to evaluate freely any and all evidence that grounds the judicial interrogation of witnesses under German law . However , this questioning is done , again in contrast ...
Страница 236
... evidence was the decisive factor in each case . Without sufficient evidence , there was no case . All three of the defendants who were acquitted were acquitted for lack of evidence.27 In no case was a defendant acquitted on the basis of ...
... evidence was the decisive factor in each case . Without sufficient evidence , there was no case . All three of the defendants who were acquitted were acquitted for lack of evidence.27 In no case was a defendant acquitted on the basis of ...
Садржај
Prelude | 24 |
Motivation Action | 53 |
The Trial Actors | 80 |
Ауторска права | |
други делови (9) нису приказани
Друга издања - Прикажи све
Чести термини и фразе
Accessory to Mord accomplice accused actions argued Auschwitz-Prozeß Boger charges civil counsel claim concentration camp context convicted December December 21 decision defendants defense attorneys Deutschland evidence extermination fact Federal Republic FFStA 4 Ks Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial Frankfurter Rundschau Fritz Bauer gas chambers genocide German courts German criminal German law Großmann guilt Hofmeyer Holocaust Ibid IG Farben indictment individual inmates investigation Jews judges juridical justice Kaduk Kaul Kaul's killing Klehr Kuczynski Langbein Laternser Laternser's motives Mulka Munich murder Nachlaß Kaul Naumann Nazi crimes Nazi past Nazi trials Nazism Neue NS-Verbrechen Nuremberg Oberscharführer orders Ormond participants particular perpetrators perpetratorship Plädoyer political prosecution prosecution's prosecutor's office prosecutors punishment question Rechtsstaat Robert Mulka Rögner role Roxin specific Stuttgart survivors tactical testified testimony Third Reich tion truth Ulrich Herbert University Press verdict Vergangenheitsbewältigung Verlag Vermerk victims Vogel Waffen SS West German Wilhelm Boger witnesses Wojak