The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, 1963-1965: Genocide, History, and the Limits of the LawCambridge University Press, 8. 3. 2010. - 340 страница The Frankfurt Auschwitz trial was the largest, most public, and most important trial of Holocaust perpetrators conducted in West German courts. Drawing on a wide range of archival sources, Devin O. Pendas provides a comprehensive history of this momentous event. Situating the trial in a thorough analysis of West German criminal law, the book argues that in confronting systematic, state-sponsored genocide, the Frankfurt court ran up against the limits of law. This book also provides a compelling account of the divided response to the trial among the West German public. |
Из књиге
Резултати 1-3 од 45
Страница 11
... justice . However , no one who takes the question of guilt seriously , above all no responsibly thoughtful jurist , will be content with this sensibility nor should they be allowed to be . Justice is not served when the guilty parties ...
... justice . However , no one who takes the question of guilt seriously , above all no responsibly thoughtful jurist , will be content with this sensibility nor should they be allowed to be . Justice is not served when the guilty parties ...
Страница 40
... justice done , a justice that they felt went beyond the " mere " rule of law . In this sense , the Auschwitz Trial proved to be a battleground , if a decidedly biased one , between distinct visions of justice : one , the justice of law ...
... justice done , a justice that they felt went beyond the " mere " rule of law . In this sense , the Auschwitz Trial proved to be a battleground , if a decidedly biased one , between distinct visions of justice : one , the justice of law ...
Страница 178
... Justice Ministry , since the one from November 27 technically empow- ered him only to discuss the situation , not to make legally binding guarantees . Sehn insisted that he had verbal permission from the Justice Minister to make such ...
... Justice Ministry , since the one from November 27 technically empow- ered him only to discuss the situation , not to make legally binding guarantees . Sehn insisted that he had verbal permission from the Justice Minister to make such ...
Садржај
Prelude | 24 |
Motivation Action | 53 |
The Trial Actors | 80 |
Ауторска права | |
други делови (9) нису приказани
Друга издања - Прикажи све
Чести термини и фразе
Accessory to Mord accomplice accused actions argued Auschwitz-Prozeß Boger charges civil counsel claim concentration camp context convicted December December 21 decision defendants defense attorneys Deutschland evidence extermination fact Federal Republic FFStA 4 Ks Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial Frankfurter Rundschau Fritz Bauer gas chambers genocide German courts German criminal German law Großmann guilt Hofmeyer Holocaust Ibid IG Farben indictment individual inmates investigation Jews judges juridical justice Kaduk Kaul Kaul's killing Klehr Kuczynski Langbein Laternser Laternser's motives Mulka Munich murder Nachlaß Kaul Naumann Nazi crimes Nazi past Nazi trials Nazism Neue NS-Verbrechen Nuremberg Oberscharführer orders Ormond participants particular perpetrators perpetratorship Plädoyer political prosecution prosecution's prosecutor's office prosecutors punishment question Rechtsstaat Robert Mulka Rögner role Roxin specific Stuttgart survivors tactical testified testimony Third Reich tion truth Ulrich Herbert University Press verdict Vergangenheitsbewältigung Verlag Vermerk victims Vogel Waffen SS West German Wilhelm Boger witnesses Wojak